Introduction: Acne is a common skin disease with important psychosocial impact. Often inadequate compliance affects the efficacy of the therapy. Because of emerging use of mobile and electronic health technology, the recent literature evaluated the helpfulness of the tools in medication adherence. The first goal of our study was to evaluate the adherence to therapy with topical adapalene 0.3%/benzoyl peroxide (A-BPO) 2.5% in different groups of patients who received explicative information supported by different strategies. The second goal was to evaluate the patient’s quality of life and skin parameters. Materials and Methods: We enrolled 126 subjects with mild to severe acne vulgaris. They were randomized into 3 groups of 42 patients each and applied daily topical A-BPO (0.3%, 2.5%) for 12 weeks. The first group (G1) was trained on the gel application by an explicative leaflet. The second group (G2) received the same instructions as group 1 and a daily SMS to remind them of the application of the product. The third group (G3) only received standard instructions. Evaluations were performed at the beginning of treatment (T0) and after 12 weeks (T1): assessment of acne severity using the Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) Scale for Acne Severity, quality of life by the Cardiff Acne Disability Index (CADI) and the Patient-Doctor Relationship Depth-of-Relationship Scale (PDRDS), skin pH, grade of hydration and adherence to treatment with a 7-day recall calendar were also measured. Results: After 12 weeks of therapy, we observed a reduction in IGA in all groups confirming the clinical efficacy of the product. In the multiple comparison analysis of IGA score reduction, a significant difference was found in G2 versus G1 and G2 versus G3, while the G1 versus G3 comparison was not statistically significant. However, the leaflet group (G1) showed better results compared to the no-leaflet group (G3). Supporting these data, we observed that adherence days correlated positively with the improvement of the single parameters. Moreover, we observed that SMS and leaflet groups had a greater improvement in quality of life evaluated by CADI and PDRDS scores. Conclusions: According to our data, this experimental setup based on text message service and leaflet service is inexpensive and easy to use. Physicians could consider using these items in their practice to enhance patient adherence and satisfaction as well as treatment outcome.

BACKGROUND: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have been introduced for the treatment of lung cancer, improving progression-free survival, objective response rate, and quality of life. However, TKIs can lead to cutaneous toxicities, including papulopustular rash, xerosis, paronychia with/without pyogenic granulomas, scalp disorders, facial hair and/or eyelash growth. AIM: In this study, we describe retrospectively all cases of mucocutaneous side effects in patients with lung cancer under TKIs referring to our outpatient for the skin care of oncological patients. METHODS: We included patients referring from January 2016 to January 2018 affected by lung cancer and under TKIs. We collected data about the clinical exam, clinical photography, dermoscopy, histology and direct microscopic examination for each patient and we performed retrospectively descriptive analyses to assess whether a specific TKIs is linked significantly to particular cutaneous toxicity. RESULTS: The majority of skin toxicities were due to afatinib, and the most common skin reaction was rash. We selected 60 patients with skin reactions, treated by TKIs for lung cancer. The majority of skin toxicities were due to afatinib (47/102 adverse reactions) and erlotinib (39/102). The most common skin reaction was rash (63% of patients), followed by xerosis (30%) and granulomas (30%). There was no significant relationship between a specific type of cutaneous reaction and specific EGFRi except for granulomas, developed more frequently in patients under afatinib (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Most of our patients (63%) developed a cutaneous rash under TKIs. Most commonly afatinib was the drug involved, although it wasn’t the most used EGFRi. Moreover, we noticed a significant correlation between afatinib therapy and appearance of granulomas.