Microplastics (MPs) have been widely found in the environment and have exerted non-negligible impacts on the environment and human health. Extensive research has shown that MPs can act as carriers for viruses and interacts with them in various ways. Whether MPs influence the persistence, transmission and infectivity of virus has attracted global concern in the context of increasing MPs contamination. This review paper provides an overview of the current state of knowledge regarding the interactions between MPs and viruses in aquatic environments. Latest progress and research trends in this field are summarized based on literature analysis. Additionally, we discuss the potential risks posed by microplastic-associated viruses to human health and the environmental safety, highlighting that MPs can affect viral transmission and infectivity through various pathways. Finally, we underscores the need for further research to address key knowledge gaps, such as elucidating synergistic effects between MPs and viruses, understanding interactions under real environmental conditions, and exploring the role of biofilms in virus–MPs interactions. This review aims to contribute to a deeper understanding on the transmission of viruses in the context of increasing MPs pollution in water, and promote actions to reduce the potential risks.

Rapid urbanization and economic development in coastal regions have significantly increased coastal nutrient pollution and remarkably changed the phytoplankton community and developed some species into bloom, resulting in large economic losses and serious threats to public health. Therefore, it is indispensable to reveal the shift in the phytoplankton community and phytoplankton abundance, and phytoplankton’s environmental drivers. However, previous studies could not present the details of the environmental drivers of phytoplankton due to samples being collected with low temporal resolution. Here, high-temporal-resolution (daily) samples were collected to investigate the influence of environmental factors on phytoplankton in Qinhuangdao for 44 days. Phytoplankton communities showed a rapid succession, with predominant genera changing in the order Skeletonema–Chaetoceros–Skeletonema–Thalassiosira. Similarly, Thalassiosira pacifica, Skeletonema costatum, Chaetoceros tortissimus, and Chattonella marina were identified as the dominant species and were abundant in 0–1.27 × 10⁷ cells·L⁻¹, 0–9.34 × 10⁶ cells·L⁻¹, 0–6.49 × 10⁶ cells·L⁻¹, and 0–3.64 × 10⁶ cells·L⁻¹, respectively. Moreover, inflows facilitate the rapid succession of the phytoplankton community. Dissolved inorganic phosphorus (DIP) was found to remarkably influence the succession of phytoplankton communities and the bloom of the top three dominant species, i.e., Thalassiosira pacifica, Skeletonema costatum, and Chaetoceros tortissimus. Overall, our results provide high-temporal-resolution observations of phytoplankton community succession and reveal its environmental drivers. This contributes to our current understanding of the occurrence of algae blooms and supports the development of management strategies to control algae bloom in coastal waters.

Phytoplankton blooms have become a global concern due to their negative impacts on public health, aquaculture, tourism, and the economic stability of coastal regions. Therefore, elucidating the shifts in phytoplankton community structure and abundance, as well as their environmental drivers, is crucial. However, existing studies often fail to capture the detailed dynamics of phytoplankton blooms and their environmental triggers due to low temporal observation resolution. In this study, high temporal resolution (daily) samples were collected over 43 days to investigate the influence of environmental factors on phytoplankton in Qinhuangdao in the summer. During the observation period, a total of 45 phytoplankton species were identified, comprising 26 Bacillariophyta species, 16 Dinophyta species, 2 Euglenophyta species, and 1 Chromophyta species. Interestingly, a lag bloom pattern of phytoplankton behind freshwater input was observed across day-to-day samples. Phytoplankton blooms typically lagged 1–3 days behind periods of decreased salinity and nutrient input, suggesting that freshwater influx provides the foundational materials and benefits for these blooms. Moreover, the phytoplankton blooms were triggered by six dominant species, i.e., Chaetoceros spp., Pseudo-nitzschia delicatissima, Skeletonema costatum, Protoperdinium spp., Leptocylindrus minimus, Pseudo-nitzschia pungens, and Thalassiosira spp. Consequently, the succession of phytoplankton showed a predominant genera shift in the following sequence: Nitzschia, Protoperdinium, and Prorocentrum – Skeletonema – Pseudo-nitzschia – Gymnodinium – Leptocylindrus. Besides that, a deterministic process dominated phytoplankton community assembly across time series, and DIP is a key factor in shifting the phytoplankton community structures in this area. In summary, our study offers high-resolution observations on the succession of phytoplankton communities and sheds light on the complex and differentiated responses of phytoplankton to environmental factors. These findings enhance our understanding of the dynamics of phytoplankton blooms and their environmental drivers, which is essential for the effective management and mitigation of their adverse impacts.

Dear Editor'I am writing to kindly request a correction to the funding information in our published paper titled " A lag bloom pattern of phytoplankton after freshwater input events revealed by daily samples during summer in Qinhuangdao coastal water, China".Upon reviewing the this paper, we noticed an error in the funding number listed in the Funding section.Current (incorrect) version:"key R&D Program of Hebei Province, China (Nos. 237301D and 2137302D)"Corrected version:"the key R&D Program of Hebei Province, China (Nos. 23373301D and 21373302D)"The change does not affect the scientific content of the paper, but it is important for accurate funding attribution. Could you please advise how to proceed with this correction?We sincerely apologize for any inconvenience caused and greatly appreciate your assistance. Best regards,