Rafael F. Rivera-Bustamante

Dr. Rafael F. Rivera-Bustamante


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

41Years (1986-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 March 2014 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CQCheng Qin
Cheng Qin
CYChangshui Yu
Changshui Yu
YSYaou Shen
Yaou Shen
XFXiaodong Fang
Xiaodong Fang
LCLang Chen
Lang Chen
ZZZhiming Zhang
Zhiming Zhang
As an economic crop, pepper satisfies people’s spicy taste and has medicinal uses worldwide. To gain a better understanding of Capsicum evolution, domestication, and specialization, we present here the genome sequence of the cultivated pepper Zunla-1 (C. annuum L.) and its wild progenitor Chiltepin (C. annuum var. glabriusculum). We estimate that the pepper genome expanded ∼0.3 Mya (with respect to the genome of other Solanaceae) by a rapid amplification of retrotransposons elements, resulting in a genome comprised of ∼81% repetitive sequences. Approximately 79% of 3.48-Gb scaffolds containing 34,476 protein-coding genes were anchored to chromosomes by a high-density genetic map. Comparison of cultivated and wild pepper genomes with 20 resequencing accessions revealed molecular footprints of artificial selection, providing us with a list of candidate domestication genes. We also found that dosage compensation effect of tandem duplication genes probably contributed to the pungent diversification in pepper. The Capsicum reference genome provides crucial information for the study of not only the evolution of the pepper genome but also, the Solanaceae family, and it will facilitate the establishment of more effective pepper breeding programs. Significance The two pepper genomes together with 20 resequencing accessions, including 3 accessions that are classified as semiwild/wild, provide a better understanding of the evolution, domestication, and divergence of various pepper species and ultimately, will enhance future genetic improvement of this important worldwide crop.

18 April 2015 in Archives of Virology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JBJudith K. Brown
Judith K. Brown
FZFrancisco Murilo Zerbini
Francisco Murilo Zerbini
Jesus Navas-CastilloJesus Navas-Castillo
Jesus Navas-Castillo
EMEnrique Moriones
Enrique Moriones
RRRoberto Ramos-Sobrinho
Roberto Ramos-Sobrinho
Arvind VarsaniArvind Varsani
Arvind Varsani
Viruses of the genus Begomovirus (family Geminiviridae) are emergent pathogens of crops throughout the tropical and subtropical regions of the world. By virtue of having a small DNA genome that is easily cloned, and due to the recent innovations in cloning and low-cost sequencing, there has been a dramatic increase in the number of available begomovirus genome sequences. Even so, most of the available sequences have been obtained from cultivated plants and are likely a small and phylogenetically unrepresentative sample of begomovirus diversity, a factor constraining taxonomic decisions such as the establishment of operationally useful species demarcation criteria. In addition, problems in assigning new viruses to established species have highlighted shortcomings in the previously recommended mechanism of species demarcation. Based on the analysis of 3,123 full-length begomovirus genome (or DNA-A component) sequences available in public databases as of December 2012, a set of revised guidelines for the classification and nomenclature of begomoviruses are proposed. The guidelines primarily consider a) genus-level biological characteristics and b) results obtained using a standardized classification tool, Sequence Demarcation Tool, which performs pairwise sequence alignments and identity calculations. These guidelines are consistent with the recently published recommendations for the genera Mastrevirus and Curtovirus of the family Geminiviridae. Genome-wide pairwise identities of 91 % and 94 % are proposed as the demarcation threshold for begomoviruses belonging to different species and strains, respectively. Procedures and guidelines are outlined for resolving conflicts that may arise when assigning species and strains to categories wherever the pairwise identity falls on or very near the demarcation threshold value.

25 August 2018 in Annual Review of Phytopathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MRMaria R. Rojas
Maria R. Rojas
MMMonica A. Macedo
Monica A. Macedo
MMMinor R. Maliano
Minor R. Maliano
MSMaria Soto-Aguilar
Maria Soto-Aguilar
JSJuliana O. Souza
Juliana O. Souza
RGRobert Gilbertson
Robert Gilbertson
Management of geminiviruses is a worldwide challenge because of the widespread distribution of economically important diseases caused by these viruses. Regardless of the type of agriculture, management is most effective with an integrated pest management (IPM) approach that involves measures before, during, and after the growing season. This includes starting with resistant cultivars and virus- and vector-free transplants and propagative plants. For high value vegetables, protected culture (e.g., greenhouses and screenhouses) allows for effective management but is limited owing to high cost. Protection of young plants in open fields is provided by row covers, but other measures are typically required. Measures that are used for crops in open fields include roguing infected plants and insect vector management. Application of insecticide to manage vectors (whiteflies and leafhoppers) is the most widely used measure but can cause undesirable environmental and human health issues. For annual crops, these measures can be more effective when combined with host-free periods of two to three months. Finally, given the great diversity of the viruses, their insect vectors, and the crops affected, IPM approaches need to be based on the biology and ecology of the virus and vector and the crop production system. Here, we present the general measures that can be used in an IPM program for geminivirus diseases, specific case studies, and future challenges.

1 August 1994 in Virology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GAG.R. Argüello-Astorga
G.R. Argüello-Astorga
Ramon Guevara-GonzalezRamon Guevara-Gonzalez
Ramon Guevara-Gonzalez
Luis Herrera-EstrellaLuis Herrera-Estrella
Luis Herrera-Estrella
RRRafael F. Rivera-Bustamante
Rafael F. Rivera-Bustamante

23 January 2013 in Archives of Virology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BMBrejnev Muhire
Brejnev Muhire
DMDarren Martin
Darren Martin
JBJudith K. Brown
Judith K. Brown
Jesus Navas-CastilloJesus Navas-Castillo
Jesus Navas-Castillo
EMEnrique Moriones
Enrique Moriones
Arvind VarsaniArvind Varsani
Arvind Varsani

1 February 2009 in Journal of Virology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
EREDGAR ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ-NEGRETE
EDGAR ANTONIO RODRIGUEZ-NEGRETE
JCJimena Carrillo-Tripp
Jimena Carrillo-Tripp
RRRafael F. Rivera-Bustamante
Rafael F. Rivera-Bustamante
RNA silencing in plants is a natural defense system mechanism against invading nucleic acids such as viruses. Geminiviruses, a family of plant viruses characterized by a circular, single-stranded DNA genome, are thought to be both inducers and targets of RNA silencing. Some natural geminivirus-host interactions lead to symptom remission or host recovery, a process commonly associated with RNA silencing-mediated defense. Pepper golden mosaic virus (PepGMV)-infected pepper plants show a recovery phenotype, which has been associated with the presence of virus-derived small RNAs. The results presented here suggest that PepGMV is targeted by both posttranscriptional and transcriptional gene silencing mechanisms. Two types of virus-related small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) were detected: siRNAs of 21 to 22 nucleotides (nt) in size that are related to the coding regions (Rep, TrAP, REn, and movement protein genes) and a 24-nt population primarily associated to the intergenic regions. Methylation levels of the PepGMV A intergenic and coat protein (CP) coding region were measured by a bisulfite sequencing approach. An inverse correlation was observed between the methylation status of the intergenic region and the concentration of viral DNA and symptom severity. The intergenic region also showed a methylation profile conserved in all times analyzed. The CP region, on the other hand, did not show a defined profile, and its methylation density was significantly lower than the one found on the intergenic region. The participation of both PTGS and TGS mechanisms in host recovery is discussed.