Aim: Use the National Health Insurance Research Database of Taiwan to determine whether patients with posttraumatic epilepsy (PTE) have an increased risk of mortality. Methods: Patients ≥20 years old ever admitted because of head injury (per International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) codes 850–854 and 959.01) during 2000–2012 were enrolled into a traumatic brain injury (TBI) cohort. The TBI cohort was divided into with PTE (ICD-9-CM code 345) and posttraumatic nonepilepsy (PTN) cohorts. We compared the PTE and PTN cohorts in terms of age, sex, and comorbidities. We calculated adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of all-cause mortality risk in these cohorts. Results: Patients with PTE had a higher incidence rate (IR) of mortality than did patients with TBI alone (IR per 1000 person-years: 71.8 vs. 27.6), with an aHR 2.31 (95% CI = 1.96–2.73). Patients with PTE aged 20–49, 50–64, and ≥65 years had, respectively, 2.78, 4.14, and 2.48 times the mortality risk of the PTN cohort. Patients with any comorbidity and PTE had 2.71 times the mortality risk as patients in the PTN cohort. Furthermore, patients with PTE had 28.2 increased hospital days and 7.85 times as frequent medical visits per year compared with the PTN cohort. Conclusion: Taiwanese patients with PTE had approximately 2 times the mortality risk and an increased medical burden compared to patients with TBI only. Our findings provide crucial information for clinicians and the government to improve TBI outcomes.

Background: Although the value of point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) is well-established for specific diseases and in the hands of trained users, its broader impact on overall ED efficiency is not yet fully known. This study aims to evaluate the association of early PoCUS, performed within 1 h of presentation, with ED patient flow, healthcare resource utilization, and quality of care in adults with non-traumatic abdominal pain. Method: This retrospective cohort study included 44,863 adult patients (≥18 years) presenting with non-traumatic abdominal pain from January 2021 to December 2023. Patients were grouped into PoCUS and no-PoCUS categories, with a subgroup analysis for those receiving PoCUS within 1 h, to evaluate ED LOS, and costs for different ED dispositions. Outcomes measured included hospital LOS, costs, mortality, and ICU admission. Results: The mean age of the subjects was 44.4 ± 17.9 years, and 61.2% were female. PoCUS was performed in 39.7% of cases, with 69.6% of these conducted within one hour. Additionally, 30.5% underwent CT. The PoCUS group had a significantly shorter ED LOS compared to the no-PoCUS group among patients admitted to general wards (p < 0.001), but not in outpatient dispositions (p = 0.282) or ICU admissions (p = 0.081). Subgroup analysis of patients receiving PoCUS within 1 h showed a significantly shorter LOS for both outpatient dispositions (p < 0.001) and general ward admissions (p < 0.001), with no effect on ICU admissions (p = 0.869). The presence or absence of CT did not alter these findings. Multivariable analysis indicated that patients who received PoCUS within one hour alone at index visit and admitted after an unscheduled return visit had lower initial ED costs (−9436.1 TWD, p < 0.001) and shorter ED LOS (−11.59 min, p < 0.001) than patients admitted directly at the index visit, with no significant increase in total resource utilization or adverse outcomes after return visits. Conclusions: PoCUS, especially when performed within one hour, was associated with reduced ED LOS and healthcare resource utilization for both outpatient dispositions and inpatient admissions without compromising patient safety or quality of care.

Point-of-care ultrasonography (POCUS) has become the most popular modality of testing for physicians in recent years and is used for improving the quality of care and increasing patient safety. However, POCUS is not always acceptable to all physicians. To address the benefits and importance of POCUS, numerous studies have examined the use of POCUS in clinical practice and even medical education. This article aims to highlight the effects of POCUS as an extension of the physical examination, and we present a case to address the reasons it should be performed. For a man experiencing abdominal pain immediately after his feeding jejunostomy tube was changed, there was high suspicion of small-bowel volvulus after a “whirlpool sign” was observed during the POCUS, whereby mesenteric vessels presented in a whirling or spiral shape. This impression was subsequently confirmed by computed tomography. Small-bowel volvulus is a rare complication of changing a feeding jejunostomy tube. The images submitted here add to the sparse evidence from the literature on the use of POCUS as an extension of the physical examination for evaluating abdominal pain. POCUS can be used after taking the patient’s history and conducting a physical examination. The observation of a whirlpool sign may indicate the presence of a volvulus that is life-threatening.