Xiaofan He

Xiaofan He


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

9Years (2018-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 April 2018 in International Journal of Mechanical Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MZMingyang Zhang
Mingyang Zhang
ZYZhenyu Yang
Zhenyu Yang
ZLZixing Lu
Zixing Lu
BLBaohua Liao
Baohua Liao
XHXiaofan He
Xiaofan He

25 September 2023 in Fatigue & Fracture of Engineering Materials & Structures
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Zhixin ZhanZhixin Zhan
Zhixin Zhan
XHXiaofan He
Xiaofan He
DTDingcheng Tang
Dingcheng Tang
LDLinwei Dang
Linwei Dang
ALAo Li
Ao Li
Hua LiHua Li
Hua Li

4 February 2025 in International Journal of Structural Integrity
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LDLinwei Dang
Linwei Dang
XHXiaofan He
Xiaofan He
DTDingcheng Tang
Dingcheng Tang
HXHao Xin
Hao Xin
BWBin Wu
Bin Wu
Purpose: Pores are the primary cause of fatigue failure in laser-directed energy deposition (L-DED) titanium alloys, which are largely determined by their location, size and shape. It is crucial for promoting the application of L-DED titanium alloys and ensuring their safety that establishing a fatigue life prediction method induced by pores, resulting in a proposed fatigue life prediction framework for L-DED Ti-6Al-4V based on a physics-informed neural network (PINN) algorithm.Design/methodology/approach: In this study, a novel fatigue life prediction framework for L-DED Ti-6Al-4V based on a PINN algorithm was proposed. The influence patterns of various fatigue-sensitive parameters were revealed. The paper also included validation and analysis of the method, such as hyperparameter analysis of the PINN, efficacy analysis driven by physical information and comparative analysis of different methods.Findings: The proposed method demonstrated high accuracy, with a correlation coefficient of 0.99 with experimental life. The coefficient of determination was 0.95 and the mean squared error was 0.06.Originality/value: The results indicate that the proposed fatigue life prediction framework was of strong generalization capability and robustness.

22 March 2024 in International Journal of Fatigue
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DTDingcheng Tang
Dingcheng Tang
XHXiaofan He
Xiaofan He
BWBin Wu
Bin Wu
LDLinwei Dang
Linwei Dang
HXHao Xin
Hao Xin
YLYuhai Li
Yuhai Li

1 November 2018 in Chinese Journal of Aeronautics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
XHXiaofan He
Xiaofan He
TWTianshuai Wang
Tianshuai Wang
XWXiaobo Wang
Xiaobo Wang
WZWeigang Zhan
Weigang Zhan
YLYuhai Li
Yuhai Li

5 August 2025 in International Journal of Structural Integrity
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Zhixin ZhanZhixin Zhan
Zhixin Zhan
MZMengwei Zhang
Mengwei Zhang
XHXiaofan He
Xiaofan He
XLXiongfei Li
Xiongfei Li
ZWZihui Wang
Zihui Wang
HLHua Li
Hua Li
Purpose: The purpose of this review is to evaluate the transformative potential of machine learning (ML) in predicting fatigue behavior. The review seeks to highlight current progress, practical applications, and emerging challenges, offering a roadmap for leveraging ML to improve reliability, accuracy, and efficiency in fatigue-related engineering analyses. Design/methodology/approach: This review systematically examines the application of machine learning (ML) techniques to fatigue behavior prediction, encompassing material properties, fatigue life, and crack growth. It employs a comprehensive survey of recent advancements, focusing on data preprocessing, regression methods, deep learning architectures, and hybrid approaches that integrate physics-based models with ML. Multiscale modeling and ensemble techniques are also analyzed for their potential to enhance prediction accuracy and reliability. Findings: The review reveals that ML techniques significantly enhance fatigue behavior prediction by addressing complex, multiscale, and nonlinear characteristics of materials. Case studies demonstrate successful ML applications in aerospace and civil engineering, underscoring its practical value. However, challenges such as limited data quality, model interpretability, and computational scalability persist, necessitating further innovation and interdisciplinary collaboration to fully realize ML’s potential. Originality/value: This review provides a comprehensive and up-to-date analysis of machine learning (ML) applications in fatigue behavior prediction, addressing material properties, fatigue life, and crack growth. It bridges the gap between traditional fatigue analysis methods and data-driven approaches, emphasizing the integration of physics-based insights with ML for enhanced accuracy and reliability.