Christopher Neigh

Dr. Christopher Neigh

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
3 May 2013 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MFMatthias Forkel
Matthias Forkel
NCNuno Carvalhais
Nuno Carvalhais
JVJan Verbesselt
Jan Verbesselt
MMMiguel D. Mahecha
Miguel D. Mahecha
CNChristopher Neigh
Christopher Neigh
MRMarkus Reichstein
Markus Reichstein
Changing trends in ecosystem productivity can be quantified using satellite observations of Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI). However, the estimation of trends from NDVI time series differs substantially depending on analyzed satellite dataset, the corresponding spatiotemporal resolution, and the applied statistical method. Here we compare the performance of a wide range of trend estimation methods and demonstrate that performance decreases with increasing inter-annual variability in the NDVI time series. Trend slope estimates based on annual aggregated time series or based on a seasonal-trend model show better performances than methods that remove the seasonal cycle of the time series. A breakpoint detection analysis reveals that an overestimation of breakpoints in NDVI trends can result in wrong or even opposite trend estimates. Based on our results, we give practical recommendations for the application of trend methods on long-term NDVI time series. Particularly, we apply and compare different methods on NDVI time series in Alaska, where both greening and browning trends have been previously observed. Here, the multi-method uncertainty of NDVI trends is quantified through the application of the different trend estimation methods. Our results indicate that greening NDVI trends in Alaska are more spatially and temporally prevalent than browning trends. We also show that detected breakpoints in NDVI trends tend to coincide with large fires. Overall, our analyses demonstrate that seasonal trend methods need to be improved against inter-annual variability to quantify changing trends in ecosystem productivity with higher accuracy.

28 June 2021 in Nature Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DLDavid Lagomasino
David Lagomasino
TFTemilola Fatoyinbo
Temilola Fatoyinbo
ECEdward Castañeda-Moya
Edward Castañeda-Moya
BCBruce D. Cook
Bruce D. Cook
PMPaul M. Montesano
Paul M. Montesano
DMDouglas C. Morton
Douglas C. Morton
Mangroves buffer inland ecosystems from hurricane winds and storm surge. However, their ability to withstand harsh cyclone conditions depends on plant resilience traits and geomorphology. Using airborne lidar and satellite imagery collected before and after Hurricane Irma, we estimated that 62% of mangroves in southwest Florida suffered canopy damage, with largest impacts in tall forests (>10 m). Mangroves on well-drained sites (83%) resprouted new leaves within one year after the storm. By contrast, in poorly-drained inland sites, we detected one of the largest mangrove diebacks on record (10,760 ha), triggered by Irma. We found evidence that the combination of low elevation (median = 9.4 cm asl), storm surge water levels (>1.4 m above the ground surface), and hydrologic isolation drove coastal forest vulnerability and were independent of tree height or wind exposure. Our results indicated that storm surge and ponding caused dieback, not wind. Tidal restoration and hydrologic management in these vulnerable, low-lying coastal areas can reduce mangrove mortality and improve resilience to future cyclones.

26 October 2021 in Earth System Science Data
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SBSimon Besnard
Simon Besnard
SKSujan Koirala
Sujan Koirala
MSMaurizio Santoro
Maurizio Santoro
UWUlrich Weber
Ulrich Weber
JNJacob Nelson
Jacob Nelson
NCNuno Carvalhais
Nuno Carvalhais
Forest age can determine the capacity of a forest to uptake carbon from the atmosphere. However, a lack of global diagnostics that reflect the forest stage and associated disturbance regimes hampers the quantification of age-related differences in forest carbon dynamics. This study provides a new global distribution of forest age circa 2010, estimated using a machine learning approach trained with more than 40 000 plots using forest inventory, biomass and climate data. First, an evaluation against the plot-level measurements of forest age reveals that the data-driven method has a relatively good predictive capacity of classifying old-growth vs. non-old-growth (precision = 0.81 and 0.99 for old-growth and non-old-growth, respectively) forests and estimating corresponding forest age estimates (NSE = 0.6 – Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency – and RMSE = 50 years – root-mean-square error). However, there are systematic biases of overestimation in young- and underestimation in old-forest stands, respectively. Globally, we find a large variability in forest age with the old-growth forests in the tropical regions of Amazon and Congo, young forests in China, and intermediate stands in Europe. Furthermore, we find that the regions with high rates of deforestation or forest degradation (e.g. the arc of deforestation in the Amazon) are composed mainly of younger stands. Assessment of forest age in the climate space shows that the old forests are either in cold and dry regions or warm and wet regions, while young–intermediate forests span a large climatic gradient. Finally, comparing the presented forest age estimates with a series of regional products reveals differences rooted in different approaches and different in situ observations and global-scale products. Despite showing robustness in cross-validation results, additional methodological insights on further developments should as much as possible harmonize data across the different approaches. The forest age dataset presented here provides additional insights into the global distribution of forest age to better understand the global dynamics in the forest water and carbon cycles. The forest age datasets are openly available at https://doi.org/10.17871/ForestAgeBGI.2021 (Besnard et al., 2021).

15 April 2008 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CNChristopher Neigh
Christopher Neigh
CTC Tucker
C Tucker
JTJ Townshend
J Townshend

1 October 2013 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CNChristopher Neigh
Christopher Neigh
RNRoss F. Nelson
Ross F. Nelson
KRK. Jon Ranson
K. Jon Ranson
HMHank A. Margolis
Hank A. Margolis
PMPaul M. Montesano
Paul M. Montesano
HAHans-Erik Andersen
Hans-Erik Andersen
The boreal forest accounts for one-third of global forests, but remains largely inaccessible to ground-based measurements and monitoring. It contains large quantities of carbon in its vegetation and soils, and research suggests that it will be subject to increasingly severe climate-driven disturbance. We employ a suite of ground-, airborne- and space-based measurement techniques to derive the first satellite LiDAR-based estimates of aboveground carbon for the entire circumboreal forest biome. Incorporating these inventory techniques with uncertainty analysis, we estimate total aboveground carbon of 38±3.1Pg. This boreal forest carbon is mostly concentrated from 50 to 55° N in eastern Canada and from 55 to 60° N in eastern Eurasia. Both of these regions are expected to warm >3°C by 2100, and monitoring the effects of warming on these stocks is important to understanding its future carbon balance. Our maps establish a baseline for future quantification of circumboreal carbon and the described technique should provide a robust method for future monitoring of the spatial and temporal changes of the aboveground carbon content

1 February 2018 in Environmental Research Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Joshua FisherJoshua Fisher
Joshua Fisher
DHDaniel Hayes
Daniel Hayes
CSChristopher R Schwalm
Christopher R Schwalm
DHDeborah N Huntzinger
Deborah N Huntzinger
ESEric Stofferahn
Eric Stofferahn
ZZZhen Zhang
Zhen Zhang