Niels J. Korsgaard

Dr. Niels J. Korsgaard

Department of Glaciology and Climate, Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland (GEUS), Øster Voldgade 10, 1350 Copenhagen, Denmark

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

19Years (2008-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 March 2014 in Nature Climate Change
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SKShfaqat Abbas Khan
Shfaqat Abbas Khan
KKKurt H. Kjær
Kurt H. Kjær
MBMichael Bevis
Michael Bevis
JBJonathan Bamber
Jonathan Bamber
JWJohn Wahr
John Wahr
IMIoana S. Muresan
Ioana S. Muresan

6 August 2021 in Earth System Science Data
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RFRobert S. Fausto
Robert S. Fausto
DADirk van As
Dirk van As
KMKenneth D. Mankoff
Kenneth D. Mankoff
BVBaptiste Vandecrux
Baptiste Vandecrux
MCMichele Citterio
Michele Citterio
JBJason Box
Jason Box
The Programme for Monitoring of the Greenland Ice Sheet (PROMICE) has been measuring climate and ice sheet properties since 2007. Currently, the PROMICE automatic weather station network includes 25 instrumented sites in Greenland. Accurate measurements of the surface and near-surface atmospheric conditions in a changing climate are important for reliable present and future assessment of changes in the Greenland Ice Sheet. Here, we present the PROMICE vision, methodology, and each link in the production chain for obtaining and sharing quality-checked data. In this paper, we mainly focus on the critical components for calculating the surface energy balance and surface mass balance. A user-contributable dynamic web-based database of known data quality issues is associated with the data products at https://github.com/GEUS-Glaciology-and-Climate/PROMICE-AWS-data-issues/ (last access: 7 April 2021). As part of the living data option, the datasets presented and described here are available at https://doi.org/10.22008/promice/data/aws (Fausto et al., 2019).

16 December 2015 in Nature
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KKKristian K. Kjeldsen
Kristian K. Kjeldsen
Niels J. KorsgaardNiels J. Korsgaard
Niels J. Korsgaard
ABAnders Bjork
Anders Bjork
SKShfaqat Abbas Khan
Shfaqat Abbas Khan
JBJason Box
Jason Box
KKKurt H. Kjær
Kurt H. Kjær

27 May 2012 in Nature Geoscience
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAnders Bjork
Anders Bjork
KKKurt H. Kjær
Kurt H. Kjær
Niels J. KorsgaardNiels J. Korsgaard
Niels J. Korsgaard
SKShfaqat Abbas Khan
Shfaqat Abbas Khan
KKKristian K. Kjeldsen
Kristian K. Kjeldsen
SFSvend Funder
Svend Funder

5 August 2011 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SFSvend Funder
Svend Funder
HGHugues Goosse
Hugues Goosse
HJHans Jepsen
Hans Jepsen
EKEigil Kaas
Eigil Kaas
KKKurt H. Kjær
Kurt H. Kjær
EWEske Willerslev
Eske Willerslev
Sea-ice coverage near northern Greenland and in the western Arctic Ocean varied in opposition over much of the Holocene.

10 May 2016 in Scientific Data
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Niels J. KorsgaardNiels J. Korsgaard
Niels J. Korsgaard
CNChristopher Nuth
Christopher Nuth
SKShfaqat Abbas Khan
Shfaqat Abbas Khan
KKKristian K. Kjeldsen
Kristian K. Kjeldsen
ABAnders Bjork
Anders Bjork
KKKurt H. Kjær
Kurt H. Kjær
Digital Elevation Models (DEMs) play a prominent role in glaciological studies for the mass balance of glaciers and ice sheets. By providing a time snapshot of glacier geometry, DEMs are crucial for most glacier evolution modelling studies, but are also important for cryospheric modelling in general. We present a historical medium-resolution DEM and orthophotographs that consistently cover the entire surroundings and margins of the Greenland Ice Sheet 1978–1987. About 3,500 aerial photographs of Greenland are combined with field surveyed geodetic ground control to produce a 25 m gridded DEM and a 2 m black-and-white digital orthophotograph. Supporting data consist of a reliability mask and a photo footprint coverage with recording dates. Through one internal and two external validation tests, this DEM shows an accuracy better than 10 m horizontally and 6 m vertically while the precision is better than 4 m. This dataset proved successful for topographical mapping and geodetic mass balance. Other uses include control and calibration of remotely sensed data such as imagery or InSAR velocity maps.