Nicola Smania

Prof. Dr. Nicola Smania

1. Neuromotor and Cognitive Rehabilitation Research Center (CRRNC), Department of Neurosciences, Biomedicine and Movement Sciences, University of Verona, 37129 Verona, Italy
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2017 in BioMed Research International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Marialuisa GandolfiMarialuisa Gandolfi
Marialuisa Gandolfi
CGChristian Geroin
Christian Geroin
EDEleonora Dimitrova
Eleonora Dimitrova
PBPaolo Boldrini
Paolo Boldrini
AWAndreas Waldner
Andreas Waldner
Nicola SmaniaNicola Smania
Nicola Smania
Introduction. Telerehabilitation enables patients to access remote rehabilitation services for patient-physiotherapist videoconferencing in their own homes. Home-based virtual reality (VR) balance training has been shown to reduce postural instability in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD). The primary aim was to compare improvements in postural stability after remotely supervised in-home VR balance training and in-clinic sensory integration balance training (SIBT). Methods. In this multicenter study, 76 PD patients (modified Hoehn and Yahr stages 2.5–3) were randomly assigned to receive either in-home VR telerehabilitation (n=38) or in-clinic SIBT (n=38) in 21 sessions of 50 minutes each, 3 days/week for 7 consecutive weeks. VR telerehabilitation consisted of graded exergames using the Nintendo Wii Fit system; SIBT included exercises to improve postural stability. Patients were evaluated before treatment, after treatment, and at 1-month follow-up. Results. Analysis revealed significant between-group differences in improvement on the Berg Balance Scale for the VR telerehabilitation group (p=0.04) and significant Time × Group interactions in the Dynamic Gait Index (p=0.04) for the in-clinic group. Both groups showed differences in all outcome measures over time, except for fall frequency. Cost comparison yielded between-group differences in treatment and equipment costs. Conclusions. VR is a feasible alternative to in-clinic SIBT for reducing postural instability in PD patients having a caregiver.

6 June 2016 in Parkinson's Disease
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FMFrancesca Magrinelli
Francesca Magrinelli
Alessandro PicelliAlessandro Picelli
Alessandro Picelli
PTPierluigi Tocco
Pierluigi Tocco
AFAngela Federico
Angela Federico
LRLaura Roncari
Laura Roncari
Stefano TamburinStefano Tamburin
Stefano Tamburin
Cardinal motor features of Parkinson’s disease (PD) include bradykinesia, rest tremor, and rigidity, which appear in the early stages of the disease and largely depend on dopaminergic nigrostriatal denervation. Intermediate and advanced PD stages are characterized by motor fluctuations and dyskinesia, which depend on complex mechanisms secondary to severe nigrostriatal loss and to the problems related to oral levodopa absorption, and motor and nonmotor symptoms and signs that are secondary to marked dopaminergic loss and multisystem neurodegeneration with damage to nondopaminergic pathways. Nondopaminergic dysfunction results in motor problems, including posture, balance and gait disturbances, and fatigue, and nonmotor problems, encompassing depression, apathy, cognitive impairment, sleep disturbances, pain, and autonomic dysfunction. There are a number of symptomatic drugs for PD motor signs, but the pharmacological resources for nonmotor signs and symptoms are limited, and rehabilitation may contribute to their treatment. The present review will focus on classical notions and recent insights into the neuropathology, neuropharmacology, and neurophysiology of motor dysfunction of PD. These pieces of information represent the basis for the pharmacological, neurosurgical, and rehabilitative approaches to PD.

2 November 2010 in Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Nicola SmaniaNicola Smania
Nicola Smania
ECElisabetta Corato
Elisabetta Corato
MTMichele Tinazzi
Michele Tinazzi
CSClementina Stanzani
Clementina Stanzani
AFAntonio Fiaschi
Antonio Fiaschi
Marialuisa GandolfiMarialuisa Gandolfi
Marialuisa Gandolfi
Background. Postural instability (PI) is a disabling sign of Parkinson’s disease (PD) not easily amenable to treatment with medication. Objective. To evaluate the effects of balance training on PI in patients with PD. Methods. A total of 64 patients with PI were randomly assigned to the experimental group (n = 33) for balance training or to the control group (n = 31) for general physical exercises. Each patient received 21 treatment sessions of 50 minutes each. Patients were evaluated by a blinded rater before and after treatment as well as 1 month posttreatment using the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Activities-Specific Balance Confidence Scale (ABC), postural transfer test, self-destabilization of the center of foot pressure test, number of falls, Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS), modified Hoehn and Yahr (H&Y) Staging Scale, and Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS). Results .At the end of treatment, the experimental group showed significant improvements in all outcome measures, except for the UPDRS and the H&Y scale. Improvement was maintained at the 1-month follow-up in all outcome measures except for the GDS. No significant changes in performance were observed in the control group. Conclusions. A program of balance training can improve PI in patients with PD.

1 March 2007 in Stroke
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Nicola SmaniaNicola Smania
Nicola Smania
SPStefano Paolucci
Stefano Paolucci
MTMichele Tinazzi
Michele Tinazzi
ABAnna Borghero
Anna Borghero
PMPaolo Manganotti
Paolo Manganotti
MGMattia Gambarin
Mattia Gambarin
Background and Purpose— Early prognosis of arm recovery is a major clinical issue in stroke. The aim of this study was to assess the prognostic value of 4 simple bedside tests. Methods— Forty-eight patients with arm paresis/plegia were evaluated on days 7, 14, 30, 90 and 180 after stroke. Assessment included 4 potential predictors of arm recovery (active finger extension, shoulder abduction, shoulder shrug and hand movement scales) and 3 outcome measures evaluating arm function (Nine Hole Peg Test, Fugl-Meyer arm subtest, Motricity Index arm subtest). Results— The active finger extension scale was the most powerful prognostic factor. Patients with active finger extension scores >3 had a high probability of achieving good performance as assessed by the Motricity Index. Conclusions— Active finger extension is a reliable early predictor of recovery of arm function in stroke patients.

18 January 2012 in Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Alessandro PicelliAlessandro Picelli
Alessandro Picelli
CMCamilla Melotti
Camilla Melotti
FOFrancesca Origano
Francesca Origano
AWAndreas Waldner
Andreas Waldner
AFAntonio Fiaschi
Antonio Fiaschi
Nicola SmaniaNicola Smania
Nicola Smania
Background . Gait impairment is a common cause of disability in Parkinson disease (PD). Electromechanical devices to assist stepping have been suggested as a potential intervention. Objective . To evaluate whether a rehabilitation program of robot-assisted gait training (RAGT) is more effective than conventional physiotherapy to improve walking. Methods . A total of 41 patients with PD were randomly assigned to 45-minute treatment sessions (12 in all), 3 days a week, for 4 consecutive weeks of either robotic stepper training (RST; n = 21) using the Gait Trainer or physiotherapy (PT; n = 20) with active joint mobilization and a modest amount of conventional gait training. Participants were evaluated before, immediately after, and 1 month after treatment. Primary outcomes were 10-m walking speed and distance walked in 6 minutes. Results . Baseline measures revealed no statistical differences between groups, but the PT group walked 0.12 m/s slower; 5 patients withdrew. A statistically significant improvement was found in favor of the RST group (walking speed 1.22 ± 0.19 m/s [ P = .035]; distance 366.06 ± 78.54 m [ P < .001]) compared with the PT group (0.98 ± 0.32 m/s; 280.11 ± 106.61 m). The RAGT mean speed increased by 0.13 m/s, which is probably not clinically important. Improvements were maintained 1 month later. Conclusions . RAGT may improve aspects of walking ability in patients with PD. Future trials should compare robotic assistive training with treadmill or equal amounts of overground walking practice.

1 January 2013 in Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Emanuela FormaggioEmanuela Formaggio
Emanuela Formaggio
Silvia Francesca StortiSilvia Francesca Storti
Silvia Francesca Storti
IGIlaria Boscolo Galazzo
Ilaria Boscolo Galazzo
Marialuisa GandolfiMarialuisa Gandolfi
Marialuisa Gandolfi
CGChristian Geroin
Christian Geroin
PMPaolo Manganotti
Paolo Manganotti
Robot-assisted therapy in patients with neurological disease is an attempt to improve function in a moderate to severe hemiparetic arm. A better understanding of cortical modifications after robot-assisted training could aid in refining rehabilitation therapy protocols for stroke patients. Modifications of cortical activity in healthy subjects were evaluated during voluntary active movement, passive robot-assisted motor movement, and motor imagery tasks performed under unimanual and bimanual protocols.