Mark Sterling

Prof. Dr. Mark Sterling

School of Engineering, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2004
Verified
Book Chapter
Closed access
PBP.M Berry
P.M Berry
Mark SterlingMark Sterling
Mark Sterling
JSJ.H Spink
J.H Spink
CBC.J Baker
C.J Baker
RSR Sylvester-Bradley
R Sylvester-Bradley
AEA.R Ennos
A.R Ennos

1 November 2003 in Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PBP.M. Berry
P.M. Berry
Mark SterlingMark Sterling
Mark Sterling
CBC.J. Baker
C.J. Baker
JSJ. Spink
J. Spink
Debbie SparkesDebbie Sparkes
Debbie Sparkes

1 March 2015 in Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FDF. Dorigatti
F. Dorigatti
Mark SterlingMark Sterling
Mark Sterling
CBC.J. Baker
C.J. Baker
Andrew D QuinnAndrew D Quinn
Andrew D Quinn

1 November 2003 in Agricultural and Forest Meteorology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Mark SterlingMark Sterling
Mark Sterling
CBC.J Baker
C.J Baker
PBP.M Berry
P.M Berry
AWA Wade
A Wade

1 March 2008 in Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Mark SterlingMark Sterling
Mark Sterling
CBC J Baker
C J Baker
SJS C Jordan
S C Jordan
TJT Johnson
T Johnson
As the speeds of both passenger and freight trains increase, there is increasing concern that the unsteady gusts generated in train boundary layers and wakes will become more of for a risk to passengers waiting on platforms and for trackside workers. In addition, the demands of interoperability make this a problem of growing relevance to railway operators across Europe. A number of model scale and full-scale experiments have been carried out in recent years that have provided robust experimental data to quantify these flows. This paper considers all the available datasets for high-speed passenger trains and container freight trains, and in making a comparison between them, arrives at a number of conclusions concerning the characteristics of train slipstreams. It is concluded that the identification of a number of distinct flow regions in earlier work is generally valid and forms a useful framework for the consideration of the problem. The flow characteristics are different in each region, and, depending upon the train type, the measurement distance from the train and height above ground, the observed peak gusts for a train may occur at any time during the train passage or in its wake. It is also concluded that results obtained from measurements around small scale moving models are in good agreement with the full scale measurements and reproduce all the important flow features.

1 December 2014 in Journal of Theoretical Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CBC.J. Baker
C.J. Baker
Mark SterlingMark Sterling
Mark Sterling
PBP. Berry
P. Berry