Michael Schoeny

Michael Schoeny


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

12Years (2015-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2017 in Preventive Medicine Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MSMichael Schoeny
Michael Schoeny
LFLouis Fogg
Louis Fogg
SBSusan W. Buchholz
Susan W. Buchholz
AMArlene Miller
Arlene Miller
JWJoEllen Wilbur
JoEllen Wilbur
The impact of interventions to increase physical activity (PA) may vary as a function of participants' barriers to PA. The aim of this paper is to determine whether individual barriers (demographic, physical health, psychological health, neighborhood factors, perceived barriers to PA, social support for PA) moderate treatment effects on increases in PA. Three treatment conditions tested the relative efficacy of a group-based PA intervention alone or supplemented by either personal or automated phone calls made between group meetings. From 2010 to 2012, 284 African American women (ages 40–65) living in the Chicago, IL, area were randomized to one of the three treatment conditions. Data collection occurred at baseline as well as 24 and 48 weeks after baseline. Moderation of intervention effects by barriers to PA were tested across four outcome measures (self-reported moderate-vigorous PA, self-reported walking, accelerometer steps, and aerobic fitness) using multilevel mixed-effects analyses. Significant condition by barrier interaction effects for the accelerometer steps outcome were found for material hardships, general health, depressive symptoms, neighborhood crime rate, and perceived barriers to PA. For aerobic fitness, intervention effects were moderated by material hardships and perceived pain. Increases in the outcome variables were greater for the conditions in which group sessions were supplemented with personal and/or automated calls. Among participants with greater barriers to PA, supplementing the intervention group meetings with between-session personal and/or automated phone calls may be an effective way to strengthen intervention effects. These results may inform the use of treatment supplements in the context of adaptive interventions.

22 January 2019 in Nutrients
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RHRebecca Hoban
Rebecca Hoban
MSMichael Schoeny
Michael Schoeny
AEAnita Esquerra-Zwiers
Anita Esquerra-Zwiers
TKTanyaporn K. Kaenkumchorn
Tanyaporn K. Kaenkumchorn
GCGina Casini
Gina Casini
APAloka L. Patel
Aloka L. Patel
Mother’s own milk (MOM) reduces the risk of morbidities in very low birth weight (VLBW) infants. When MOM is unavailable, donor breastmilk (DM) is used, with unclear impact on short- and long-term growth. This retrospective analysis compared anthropometric data at six time points from birth to 20–24 months corrected age in VLBW infants who received MOM supplements of preterm formula (n = 160) versus fortified DM (n = 161) during neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) hospitalization. The cohort was 46% female; mean birth weight and gestational age (GA) were 998 g and 27.3 weeks. Multilevel linear growth models assessed changes in growth z-scores short-term (to NICU discharge) and long-term (post-discharge), controlling for amount of DM or formula received in first 28 days of life, NICU length of stay (LOS), birth GA, and sex. Z-scores for weight and length decreased during hospitalization but increased for all parameters including head circumference post-discharge. Short-term growth was positively associated with LOS and birth GA. A higher preterm formula proportion, but not DM proportion, was associated with slower rates of decline in short-term growth trajectories, but feeding type was unrelated to long-term growth. In conclusion, controlling for total human milk fed, DM did not affect short- or long-term growth.


1 September 2016 in Contemporary Clinical Trials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SBSusan M. Breitenstein
Susan M. Breitenstein
MSMichael Schoeny
Michael Schoeny
HRHeather Risser
Heather Risser
Tricia J JohnsonTricia J Johnson
Tricia J Johnson

9 July 2015 in American Journal of Health Promotion
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JWJoEllen Wilbur
JoEllen Wilbur
AMArlene Michaels Miller
Arlene Michaels Miller
LFLouis Fogg
Louis Fogg
JMJudith McDevitt
Judith McDevitt
CCCynthia M. Castro
Cynthia M. Castro
FFFaha Facc
Faha Facc
Purpose. To compare the effects of a physical activity (PA) intervention of group meetings versus group meetings supplemented by personal calls or automated calls on the adoption and maintenance of PA and on weight stability among African-American women. Design. Randomized clinical trial with three conditions randomly assigned across six sites. Setting. Health settings in predominately African-American communities. Subjects. There were 288 women, aged 40 to 65, without major signs/symptoms of pulmonary/cardiovascular disease. Intervention. Six group meetings delivered over 48 weeks with either 11 personal motivational calls, 11 automated motivational messages, or no calls between meetings. Measures. Measures included PA (questionnaires, accelerometer, aerobic fitness), weight, and body composition at baseline, 24 weeks, and 48 weeks. Analysis. Analysis of variance and mixed models. Results. Retention was 90% at 48 weeks. Adherence to PA increased significantly (p < .001) for questionnaire (d = .56, 128 min/wk), accelerometer (d = .37, 830 steps/d), and aerobic fitness (d =.41, 7 steps/2 min) at 24 weeks and was maintained at 48 weeks (p > .001), with no differences across conditions. Weight and body composition showed no significant changes over the course of the study. Conclusion. Group meetings are a powerful intervention for increasing PA and preventing weight gain and may not need to be supplemented with telephone calls, which add costs and complexity.

1 July 2016 in Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LBLynne T. Braun
Lynne T. Braun
JWJoEllen Wilbur
JoEllen Wilbur
SBSusan W. Buchholz
Susan W. Buchholz
MSMichael Schoeny
Michael Schoeny
AMArlene M. Miller
Arlene M. Miller
JMJudith McDevitt
Judith McDevitt
Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the largest contributor to disparate morbidity and mortality in African American women. Objective: The aims of this article are to describe in a cohort of sedentary, urban community-based midlife African American women eligible for a physical activity program their (1) CVD risk factors and (2) awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension and hypercholesterolemia. Methods: Cross-sectional baseline findings on 297 women were examined at baseline of a controlled physical activity clinical trial. Cardiovascular disease risks included hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, smoking, diabetes, and obesity. Among women with hypertension and hypercholesterolemia, rates of awareness, treatment, and control were calculated. Results: Our sample had significantly more hypertension and obesity than reported in other national samples of African American women. The women mirrored national samples of African American women: fewer than 60% had adequate control of hypertension. Versus national samples of African Americans (men/women combined), our study groups both showed significantly lower low-density-lipoprotein cholesterol level: treatment, 33% versus 63.8%, and control, 24.8% versus 45.3%. Conclusions: Because national samples are more heterogeneous, our sample provides important information about CVD risks in inactive, urban community-dwelling, midlife African American women. Given the opportunity, many such women at elevated risk for CVD are willing to participate in a physical activity intervention. They must be identified and offered pharmacological and lifestyle interventions.