Seth Kotey

Mr. Seth Kotey

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 March 2023 in IET Communications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SKSeth Kotey
Seth Kotey
Eric TchaoEric Tchao
Eric Tchao
AAAbdul‐Rahman Ahmed
Abdul‐Rahman Ahmed
AAAndrew Selasi Agbemenu
Andrew Selasi Agbemenu
Henry Nunoo-MensahHenry Nunoo-Mensah
Henry Nunoo-Mensah
EKEliel Keelson
Eliel Keelson
Blockchain technology has been increasingly adopted over the past few years since the introduction of Bitcoin, with several blockchain architectures and solutions being proposed. Most proposed solutions have been developed in isolation, without a standard protocol or cryptographic structure to work with. This has led to the problem of interoperability, where solutions running on different blockchain platforms are unable to communicate, limiting the scope of use. With blockchains being adopted in a variety of fields such as the Internet of Things, it is expected that the problem of interoperability if not addressed quickly, will stifle technology advancement. This paper presents the current state of interoperability solutions proposed for heterogenous blockchain systems. A look is taken at interoperability solutions, not only for cryptocurrencies, but also for general data‐based use cases. Current open issues in heterogenous blockchain interoperability are presented. Additionally, some possible research directions are presented to enhance and to extend the existing blockchain interoperability solutions. It was discovered that though there are a number of proposed solutions in literature, few have seen real‐world implementation. The lack of blockchain‐specific standards has slowed the progress of interoperability. It was also realized that most of the proposed solutions are developed targeting cryptocurrency‐based applications.

30 January 2019 in Technologies
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SKSeth Kotey
Seth Kotey
Eric TchaoEric Tchao
Eric Tchao
JGJames Gadze
James Gadze
Distributed denial of service (DDoS) attacks are a major threat to any network-based service provider. The ability of an attacker to harness the power of a lot of compromised devices to launch an attack makes it even more complex to handle. This complexity can increase even more when several attackers coordinate to launch an attack on one victim. Moreover, attackers these days do not need to be highly skilled to perpetrate an attack. Tools for orchestrating an attack can easily be found online and require little to no knowledge about attack scripts to initiate an attack. Studies have been done severally to develop defense mechanisms to detect and defend against DDoS attacks. As defense schemes are designed and developed, attackers are also on the move to evade these defense mechanisms and so there is a need for a continual study in developing defense mechanisms. This paper discusses the current DDoS defense mechanisms, their strengths and weaknesses.

26 November 2019 in Computers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SKSeth Kotey
Seth Kotey
Eric TchaoEric Tchao
Eric Tchao
JGJames Gadze
James Gadze
A denial of service (DoS) attack in a computer network is an attack on the availability of computer resources to prevent users from having access to those resources over the network. Denial of service attacks can be costly, capable of reaching $100,000 per hour. Development of easily-accessible, simple DoS tools has increased the frequency and reduced the level of expertise needed to launch an attack. Though these attack tools have been available for years, there has been no proposed defense mechanism targeted specifically at them. Most defense mechanisms in literature are designed to defend attacks captured in datasets like the KDD Cup 99 dataset from 20 years ago and from tools no longer in use in modern attacks. In this paper, we capture and analyze traffic generated by some of these DoS attack tools using Wireshark Network Analyzer and propose a signature-based DoS detection mechanism based on SVM classifier to defend against attacks launched by these attack tools. Our proposed detection mechanism was tested with Snort IDS and compared with some already existing defense mechanisms in literature and had a high detection accuracy, low positive rate and fast detection time.

29 November 2024 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SKSeth Kotey
Seth Kotey
Eric TchaoEric Tchao
Eric Tchao
AAAndrew Selasi Agbemenu
Andrew Selasi Agbemenu
AAAbdul-Rahman Ahmed
Abdul-Rahman Ahmed
EKEliel Keelson
Eliel Keelson
Blockchain interoperability is one of the major challenges that has sprung up with the advancement of blockchain technology. A vast number of blockchains has been developed to aid in the continuous adoption of blockchain technology. These blockchains are developed without a standard protocol, therefore making them unable to interoperate with other blockchains directly. In this paper, we present a framework to enable blockchains to interoperate in a decentralized setup. This framework maintains the decentralized property of blockchains. Additionally, an encryption of data is employed in the transfer of data between blockchains with hash-based verification ensuring the integrity of data transferred. Light client verification, based on Simplified Payment Verification, is used as a final security measure to ensure only valid transactions go through consensus to be appended to the destination blockchain. A peer-to-peer network setup modified for use in the proposed framework is also presented. The peer-to-peer setup is tested and compared with a single client–server setup to determine the computational impact it will have when implemented.