Agents targeting colchicine-binding pocket usually show a minimal drug-resistance issue, albeit often associated with high toxicity. Chalcone-based compounds, which may bind to colchicine-binding site, are found in many edible fruits, suggesting that they can be effective drugs with less toxicity. Therefore, we synthesized and examined 24 quinolone chalcone compounds, from which we identified ((E)-3-(3-(2-Methoxyphenyl)-3-oxoprop-1-enyl) quinolin-2(1H)-one) (CTR-17) and ((E)-6-Methoxy-3-(3-(2-methoxyphenyl)-3-oxoprop-1-enyl) quinolin-2(1H)-one) (CTR-20) as promising leads. In particular, CTR-20 was effective against 65 different cancer cell lines originated from 12 different tissues, largely in a cancer cell-specific manner. We found that both CTR-17 and CTR-20 reversibly bind to the colchicine-binding pocket on β-tubulin. Interestingly however, both the CTRs were highly effective against multidrug-resistant cancer cells while colchicine, paclitaxel and vinblastine were not. Our study with CTR-20 showed that it overcomes multidrug-resistance through its ability to impede MRP1 function while maintaining strong inhibition against microtubule activity. Data from mice engrafted with the MDA-MB-231 triple-negative breast cancer cells showed that both CTR-17 and CTR-20 possess strong anticancer activity, alone or in combination with paclitaxel, without causing any notable side effects. Together, our data demonstrates that both the CTRs can be effective and safe drugs against many different cancers, especially against multidrug-resistant tumors.

Cancer immune therapy has recently shown tremendous promise to combat many different cancers. The microtubule is a well-defined and very effective cancer therapeutic target. Interestingly, several lines of evidence now suggest that microtubules are intimately connected to the body’s immune responses. This raises the possibility that the combination of microtubule inhibitors and immune therapy can be a highly effective option for cancer treatments. However, our understanding on this potentially important aspect is still very limited, due in part to the multifaceted nature of microtubule functions. Microtubules are not only involved in maintaining cell morphology, but also a variety of cellular processes, including the movement of secretory vesicles and organelles, intracellular macromolecular assembly, signaling pathways, and cell division. Microtubule inhibitors may be subdivided into two classes: Anti-depolymerization agents such as the taxane family, and anti-polymerization agents such as colchicine and vinka alkaloids. These two different classes may have different effects on immune cell subtypes. Anti-depolymerization agents can not only induce NK cells, but also appear to inhibit T regulatory (Treg) cells. However, different inhibitors may have different functions even among the same class. For example, the doxetaxel anti-depolymerization agent up-regulates cytotoxic T cells, while paclitaxel down-regulates them. Certain anti-polymerization agents such as colchicine appear to down-regulate most immune cell types, while inducing dendritic cell maturation and increasing M1 macrophage population. In contrast, the vinblastine anti-polymerization agent activates many of these cell types, albeit down-regulating Treg cells. In this review, we focus on the various effects of tubulin inhibitors on the activities of the body’s immune system, in the hope of paving the way to develop an effective cancer therapy by combining tubulin-targeting anticancer agents and immune therapy.

In order to clarify the status of PCNA in normal and transformed cells, we performed analysis of this protein by 2D‐PAGE, Western blot and mass spectrometry. All the cell lines examined contained the major PCNA form (pI 4.57/30 kDa), that is not post‐translationally modified. In addition to the major form, two minor isoforms (pI 4.52/30 kDa and pI 4.62/30 kDa) were also detected in all the cell lines examined. However, the level of PCNA in cancer cells is 5–6 folds higher than those in primary and most of the immortalized cells. Taken together, the significant difference in PCNA status between cancer and normal cells is not at the post‐translational modifications but in the overall levels of PCNA.

In an attempt to develop effective and potentially safe anticancer agents, thirty-six 4-aminoquinoline derived sulfonyl analogs were designed and synthesized using a hybrid pharmacophore approach. The cytotoxicity of these compounds was determined using three breast tumor cell lines (MDA-MB231, MDA-MB468 and MCF7) and two matching non-cancer breast epithelial cell lines (184B5 and MCF10A). Although most of the compounds were quite effective on the breast cancer cells, the compound 7-chloro-4-(4-(2,4-dinitrophenylsulfonyl)piperazin-1-yl)quinoline (13; VR23) emerged as potentially the most desirable one in this series of compounds. Data from the NCI-60 cancer panel screening show that compound 13 is effective on a wide range of different cancers. Importantly, compound 13 is needed up to 17.6-fold less doses to achieve the same IC₅₀ against cancer than non-cancer cells (MDA-MB468 vs MCF10A), suggesting that it can potentially be less toxic to normal cells. Cancer cells formed multiple centrosomes in the presence of compound 13, resulting in the cell cycle arrest at prometa-meta phase. This abnormality leads to eventual cell demise with sub-G1 DNA content typically shown with apoptotic cells. In addition, compound 13 also causes an increase in lysosomal volume in cancer but not in non-cancer cells, which may contribute at least in part to its preferential cancer cell-killing. The cancer cell-killing effect of compound 13 is highly potentiated when combined with either bortezomib or monastrol.

In an attempt to improve anti-breast cancer activity, a new series of 4-piperazinylquinoline derivatives based on the urea/thiourea scaffold were designed and synthesised by a pharmacophore hybrid approach. We then examined for their antiproliferative effects on three human breast tumor cell lines, MDA-MB231, MDA-MB468 and MCF7, and two non-cancer breast epithelial cell lines, 184B5 and MCF10A. Among those 26 novel compounds examined, 5, 9, 17, 18, 21, 23 and 29 showed significantly improved antiproliferative activity on breast cancer cells. Compound 23 (4-(7-chloro-quinolin-4-yl)-piperazine-1-carbothioic acid (2-morpholin-4-yl-ethyl)-amide) (RL-15) is especially desirable, since its antigrowth/cell-killing activity is 7-11 fold higher on cancer than non-cancer cells. Data from cell biological studies demonstrated that cancer cells compromised plasma membrane integrity in the presence of compound 23. The cancer cell-specific property of compound 23 shown in cell culture stands in vivo test, this compound can be an excellent lead for effective and safe anticancer drug.