Saturnino Marco Lupi

Prof. Dr. Saturnino Marco Lupi

Department of Clinico-Surgical, Diagnostic and Pediatric Sciences, Dental Clinic, University of Pavia, P.le Golgi 2, 27100 Pavia, Italy
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
13 May 2023 in Mediators of Inflammation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Gaetano IsolaGaetano Isola
Gaetano Isola
SSSimona Santonocito
Simona Santonocito
Saturnino Marco LupiSaturnino Marco Lupi
Saturnino Marco Lupi
Alessandro PolizziAlessandro Polizzi
Alessandro Polizzi
RSRossana Sclafani
Rossana Sclafani
EMEnrico Marchetti
Enrico Marchetti
During recent years, considerable progress has been made in understanding the etiopathogenesis of periodontitis in its various forms and their interactions with the host. Furthermore, a number of reports have highlighted the importance of oral health and disease in systemic conditions, especially cardiovascular diseases and diabetes. In this regard, research has attempted to explain the role of periodontitis in promoting alteration in distant sites and organs. Recently, DNA sequencing studies have revealed how oral infections can occur in distant sites such as the colon, reproductive tissues, metabolic diseases, and atheromas. The objective of this review is to describe and update the emerging evidence and knowledge regarding the association between periodontitis and systemic disease and to analyse the evidence that has reported periodontitis as a risk factor for the development of various forms of systemic diseases in order to provide a better understanding of the possible shared etiopathogenetic pathways between periodontitis and the different forms of systemic diseases.

26 February 2017 in Stem Cells International
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GCGabriele Ceccarelli
Gabriele Ceccarelli
RPRossella Presta
Rossella Presta
LBLaura Benedetti
Laura Benedetti
MAMaria Gabriella Cusella De Angelis
Maria Gabriella Cusella De Angelis
Saturnino Marco LupiSaturnino Marco Lupi
Saturnino Marco Lupi
Ruggero Rodriguez y BaenaRuggero Rodriguez y Baena
Ruggero Rodriguez y Baena
Bone regeneration is currently one of the most important and challenging tissue engineering approaches in regenerative medicine. Bone regeneration is a promising approach in dentistry and is considered an ideal clinical strategy in treating diseases, injuries, and defects of the maxillofacial region. Advances in tissue engineering have resulted in the development of innovative scaffold designs, complemented by the progress made in cell-based therapies. In vitro bone regeneration can be achieved by the combination of stem cells, scaffolds, and bioactive factors. The biomimetic approach to create an ideal bone substitute provides strategies for developing combined scaffolds composed of adult stem cells with mesenchymal phenotype and different organic biomaterials (such as collagen and hyaluronic acid derivatives) or inorganic biomaterials such as manufactured polymers (polyglycolic acid (PGA), polylactic acid (PLA), and polycaprolactone). This review focuses on different biomaterials currently used in dentistry as scaffolds for bone regeneration in treating bone defects or in surgical techniques, such as sinus lift, horizontal and vertical bone grafts, or socket preservation. Our review would be of particular interest to medical and surgical researchers at the interface of cell biology, materials science, and tissue engineering, as well as industry-related manufacturers and researchers in healthcare, prosthetics, and 3D printing, too.

13 August 2022 in Mediators of Inflammation
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSimona Santonocito
Simona Santonocito
Alessandro PolizziAlessandro Polizzi
Alessandro Polizzi
EMEnrico Marchetti
Enrico Marchetti
DOMENICO DALESSANDRIDOMENICO DALESSANDRI
DOMENICO DALESSANDRI
MMMarco Migliorati
Marco Migliorati
Gaetano IsolaGaetano Isola
Gaetano Isola
Diabetes mellitus and periodontitis are two of the most common chronic diseases affecting the world’s population, and they are intimately linked. For several years, in fact, it has been known that there is an interdependent relationship between the two diseases: Diabetes promotes the destruction of periodontal tissues, and periodontal disease negatively affects glycemic control. In relation to the control of dental plaque and oral dysbiosis responsible for periodontal disease, both nonsurgical and surgical therapy associated with proper home hygiene procedures have emerged as essential for good glycemic control. Moreover, several evidences suggest the essential role played by the control of periodontal disease in preventing the onset of the most common complications of diabetes: cardiovascular diseases, retinopathies, and other systemic diseases. The aim of this study is to update the current knowledge on the bi-univocal relationship between diabetes and periodontitis and the impact of therapy in the optimal management of these two disorders. From the information found in the literature, it has emerged that the correct treatment of periodontal disease in diabetic patients represents one of the main mechanisms and means currently established and valid to control periodontal disease and glucose metabolism and prevent the onset or development of diabetic complications.

1 May 2013 in Journal of Craniofacial Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Ruggero Rodriguez y BaenaRuggero Rodriguez y Baena
Ruggero Rodriguez y Baena
Saturnino Marco LupiSaturnino Marco Lupi
Saturnino Marco Lupi
RPRoberta Pastorino
Roberta Pastorino
CMCarlo Maiorana
Carlo Maiorana
ALAlessandra Lucchese
Alessandra Lucchese
SRSilvana Rizzo
Silvana Rizzo
Although numerous biomaterials are used for maxillary sinus-lift surgery, the ideal material for such procedures has not yet been identified. Both heterologous and alloplastic bone substitutes have a solely osteoconductive effect and lack the osteoinductive properties of the bone morphogenetic proteins typical of autologous bone. Our group assessed a new alloplastic graft material, poly(lactic-co-glycolic) acid/hydroxyapatite (PLGA/HA), implanted in a human model of maxillary sinus-lift surgery. For this prospective, random, double-blind trial, we used deproteinized bovine bone (DBB) as the comparison material. Radiographic bone vertical height and density were assessed at approximately 28 weeks after grafting using cone-beam computed tomography. The vertical dimension of the regenerated bone was equivalent between the 2 groups. The density of the bone regenerated using PLGA/HA was significantly lower than that obtained with DBB. Despite clinical assessments demonstrating that PLGA/HA has sufficient characteristics for use in sinus-lift surgery, DBB provided greater bone density and an equivalent vertical dimension of grafted bone. Further studies are needed to supplement the radiologic findings with histologic and micromorphometric examinations.

1 January 2017 in The International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RBRuggero Rodriguez Y Baena
Ruggero Rodriguez Y Baena
RPRoberta Pastorino
Roberta Pastorino
GEGherlone Felice Enrico
Gherlone Felice Enrico
LPLetizia Perillo
Letizia Perillo
Saturnino Marco LupiSaturnino Marco Lupi
Saturnino Marco Lupi
ALAlessandra Lucchese
Alessandra Lucchese
Ruggero Rodriguez y Baena, MD, DDS/Roberta Pastorino, DDS/Enrico Felice Gherlone, MD, DDS/Letizia Perillo, DDS, MS Orth/Saturnino Marco Lupi, DDS/Alessandra Lucchese, DDS, MS Orth: Purpose: The histomorphometric results of sinus floor augmentation with deproteinized bovine bone (DBB) and a new fully synthetic bone substitute, poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid/hydroxyapatite) (PLGA/HA), were compared in humans. Materials and Methods: Twelve maxillary sinuses of eight patients requiring major maxillary sinus floor augmentation and free of concomitant conditions (ASA scores 1 and 2) were studied. Lateral sinus augmentation was performed using DBB or PLGA/HA grafts; sites were randomly assigned to control or test groups. Patients were reexamined approximately 6 months after grafting using cone beam computed tomography scans, and biopsy samples were harvested from implant sites. Total bone volume, residual graft material volume, and new bone volume were assessed. Results: Healing times were similar between groups. Measurable biopsy specimens were available from four of the test sites and six of the control sites. PLGA/HA grafts showed no trace of graft material, whereas DBB grafts had a mean graft area of 16.5% (P < .05). Mean percent newly formed bone tended to be greater for PLGA/HA (44.45%) than for DBB (27.51%). Mean total volume percent did not differ significantly: PLGA/HA = 44.45%, DBB = 44.10%. Conclusion: DBB and PLGA/HA produced similar total bone volumes. PLGA/HA appeared to be completely resorbed, whereas DBB presented residual graft material. With the limitations due to the small sample size, both materials were suitable for sinus floor augmentation.

17 December 2021 in Healthcare
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Saturnino Marco LupiSaturnino Marco Lupi
Saturnino Marco Lupi
JLJessica Landini
Jessica Landini
GOGiorgia Olivieri
Giorgia Olivieri
CTClaudia Todaro
Claudia Todaro
Andrea ScribanteAndrea Scribante
Andrea Scribante
Ruggero Rodriguez y BaenaRuggero Rodriguez y Baena
Ruggero Rodriguez y Baena
Background: the position of the mandibular lingula (Li) affects the success rate of the inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) and ramus osteotomies. This study evaluated the position of the Li, to investigate the anatomical relationship between the Li and some anatomical measurements using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT). Methods: 201 hemimandibular CBCTs of 111 patients (43 males and 68 females; 18 to 88 years old) were retrospectively evaluated. The Li location was determined from the lingula tip to: the occlusal plane, the anterior and posterior borders of the mandibular ramus, the lower border of the mandible, the distal surface of the mandibular second molar, and the mandibular notch. We evaluated the correlations between the Li and the anteroposterior diameter of the mandibular ramus; the vertical distance between condyle and mandibular angle; the mesial–distal diameter of the first, second, and third mandibular molar, the intercanine distance, the intermolar distances among the first, second, and third mandibular molars; the distance between the intermolar line of the first molar and midline, and the length of the mandibular body. Results: the vertical distance of the Li from the occlusal plane was 11.22 ± 4.27 mm. Some parameters significantly correlated with the anatomical measurements taken into consideration. Conclusions: the present study provides new information concerning the Li and mandibular anatomy in the Italian population. Moreover, by correlating some anatomic measurements to the Li position, the localization of the Li is made possible, indirectly through the measurement of some distances between anatomical landmarks.