Sudhakar Venkatesh

Dr. Sudhakar Venkatesh

Professor of Radiology, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
19 February 2013 in Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SVSudhakar Venkatesh
Sudhakar Venkatesh
MYMeng Yin
Meng Yin
RERichard L. L Ehman
Richard L. L Ehman
Many pathological processes cause marked changes in the mechanical properties of tissue. MR elastography (MRE) is a noninvasive MRI based technique for quantitatively assessing the mechanical properties of tissues in vivo. MRE is performed by using a vibration source to generate low frequency mechanical waves in tissue, imaging the propagating waves using a phase contrast MRI technique, and then processing the wave information to generate quantitative images showing mechanical properties such as tissue stiffness. Since its first description in 1995, published studies have explored many potential clinical applications including brain, thyroid, lung, heart, breast, and skeletal muscle imaging. However, the best‐documented application to emerge has been the use of MRE to assess liver disease. Multiple studies have demonstrated that there is a strong correlation between MRE‐measured hepatic stiffness and the stage of fibrosis at histology. The emerging literature indicates that MRE can serve as a safer, less expensive, and potentially more accurate alternative to invasive liver biopsy which is currently the gold standard for diagnosis and staging of liver fibrosis. This review describes the basic principles, technique of performing a liver MRE, analysis and calculation of stiffness, clinical applications, limitations, and potential future applications. J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2013;37:544–555.

1 March 2015 in Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSSiddharth Singh
Siddharth Singh
SVSudhakar Venkatesh
Sudhakar Venkatesh
ZWZhen Wang
Zhen Wang
FMFrank H. Miller
Frank H. Miller
UMUtaroh Motosugi
Utaroh Motosugi
RERichard L. Ehman
Richard L. Ehman

1 June 2008 in American Journal of Roentgenology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SVSudhakar Venkatesh
Sudhakar Venkatesh
MYMeng Yin
Meng Yin
JGJames F. Glockner
James F. Glockner
NTNaoki Takahashi
Naoki Takahashi
PAPhilip A. Araoz
Philip A. Araoz
RERichard L. L Ehman
Richard L. L Ehman
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential value of MR elastography (MRE) in the characterization of solid liver tumors.MATERIALS AND METHODS. Forty-four liver tumors (14 me...

28 August 2015 in European Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SSSiddharth Singh
Siddharth Singh
SVSudhakar Venkatesh
Sudhakar Venkatesh
RLRohit Loomba
Rohit Loomba
ZWZhen Wang
Zhen Wang
CSClaude Sirlin
Claude Sirlin
RERichard L. Ehman
Richard L. Ehman

1 November 2016 in RadioGraphics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ABAparna Srinivasa Babu
Aparna Srinivasa Babu
MWMichael L. Wells
Michael L. Wells
OTOleg M. Teytelboym
Oleg M. Teytelboym
JMJustin E. Mackey
Justin E. Mackey
FMFrank H. Miller
Frank H. Miller
SVSudhakar Venkatesh
Sudhakar Venkatesh
This article provides an overview of US- and MR-based elastographic techniques, which are emerging to have practical clinical effects on diagnosis and management of patients with chronic liver disease and are replacing liver biopsy as noninvasive tools for assessment of hepatic fibrosis. Chronic liver disease has multiple causes, many of which are increasing in prevalence. The final common pathway of chronic liver disease is tissue destruction and attempted regeneration, a pathway that triggers fibrosis and eventual cirrhosis. Assessment of fibrosis is important not only for diagnosis but also for management, prognostic evaluation, and follow-up of patients with chronic liver disease. Although liver biopsy has traditionally been considered the reference standard for assessment of liver fibrosis, noninvasive techniques are the emerging focus in this field. Ultrasound-based elastography and magnetic resonance (MR) elastography are gaining popularity as the modalities of choice for quantifying hepatic fibrosis. These techniques have been proven superior to conventional cross-sectional imaging for evaluation of fibrosis, especially in the precirrhotic stages. Moreover, elastography has added utility in the follow-up of previously diagnosed fibrosis, the assessment of treatment response, evalu...

1 January 2012 in Cancer Imaging
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
THTiffany Hennedige
Tiffany Hennedige
SVSudhakar Venkatesh
Sudhakar Venkatesh
Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver cancer. Imaging is important for establishing a diagnosis of HCC. Several imaging modalities including ultrasonography (US), computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), positron emission tomography (PET) and angiography are used in evaluating patients with chronic liver disease and suspected HCC. CT, MRI and contrast-enhanced US have replaced biopsy for diagnosis of HCC. Dynamic multiphase contrast-enhanced CT or MRI is the current standard for imaging diagnosis of HCC. Functional imaging techniques such as perfusion CT and diffusion-weighted MRI provide additional information about tumor angiogenesis that may be useful for treatment. Techniques evaluating tissue mechanical properties such as magnetic resonance elastography, and acoustic radiation force impulse imaging are being explored for characterizing liver lesions. The role of PET in the evaluation of HCC is evolving with promise seen especially with the use of a hepatocyte-specific PET tracer. Imaging is also critical for assessment of treatment response and detection of recurrence following locoregional treatment. Knowledge of the post-treatment appearance of HCC is essential for correct interpretation. This review article provides an overview of the role of imaging in the diagnosis, staging and post-treatment follow-up of HCC.