Itaconate, a metabolite produced during inflammatory macrophage activation, has been extensively described to be involved in immunoregulation, oxidative stress, and lipid peroxidation. As a form of iron and lipid hydroperoxide-dependent regulated cell death, ferroptosis plays a critical role in sepsis-induced acute lung injury (ALI). However, the relationship between itaconate and ferroptosis remains unclear. This study aims to explore the regulatory role of itaconate on ferroptosis in sepsis-induced ALI. In in vivo experiments, mice were injected with LPS (10 mg/kg) for 12 h to generate experimental sepsis models. Differential gene expression analysis indicated that genes associated with ferroptosis existed significant differences after itaconate pretreatment. 4-octyl itaconate (4-OI), a cell-permeable derivative of endogenous itaconate, can significantly alleviate lung injury, increase LPS-induced levels of glutathione peroxidase 4 (GPX4) and reduce prostaglandin-endoperoxide synthase 2 (PTGS2), malonaldehyde (MDA), and lipid ROS. In vitro experiments showed that both 4-OI and ferrostatin-1 inhibited LPS-induced lipid peroxidation and injury of THP-1 macrophage. Mechanistically, we identified that 4-OI inhibited the GPX4-dependent lipid peroxidation through increased accumulation and activation of Nrf2. The silence of Nrf2 abolished the inhibition of ferroptosis from 4-OI in THP-1 cells. Additionally, the protection of 4-OI for ALI was abolished in Nrf2-knockout mice. We concluded that ferroptosis was one of the critical mechanisms contributing to sepsis-induced ALI. Itaconate is promising as a therapeutic candidate against ALI through inhibiting ferroptosis.

The role of NOD‐like receptor protein 3 (NLRP3)‐mediated pyroptosis in acute lung injury (ALI) has been well identified previously. Stimulator of interferon genes (STING) is an indispensable adaptor protein, which could regulate inflammation and pyroptosis during infection; however, its role in lipopolysaccharide (LPS)‐induced ALI remains obscure. This study aimed to explore whether STING participated in the development of LPS‐induced ALI as well as the underlying mechanism. We confirmed that LPS significantly enhanced the expression and phosphorylation of STING in lung tissue and primary macrophages from mice. STING deficiency relieved inflammation and oxidative stress in LPS‐treated murine lungs and macrophages. Meanwhile, STING deficiency also abolished the activation of NLRP3 inflammasome and pyroptosis; however, NLRP3 overexpression by adenovirus offset the beneficial effects of STING deficiency in macrophages treated with LPS. Additionally, the level of mitochondrial DNA (mt‐DNA) significantly increased in macrophages after LPS treatment. Intriguingly, although exogenous mt‐DNA stimulation did not influence the level of STING, it could still trigger the phosphorylation of STING as well as pyroptosis, inflammation, and oxidative stress of macrophages. And the adverse effects induced by mt‐DNA could be offset after STING was knocked out. Furthermore, the inhibition of the sensory receptor of cytosolic DNA (cyclic GMP‐AMP synthase, cGAS) also blocked the activation of STING and NLRP3 inflammasome, meanwhile, it alleviated ALI without affecting the expression of STING after LPS challenge. Furthermore, cGAS inhibition also blocked the production of cGAMP induced by LPS, indicating that mt‐DNA and cGAS could activate STING‐NLRP3‐mediated pyroptosis independent of the expression of STING. Finally, we found that LPS upregulated the expression of transcription factor c‐Myc, which subsequently enhanced the activity of STING promoter and promoted its expression without affecting its phosphorylation. Collectively, our study disclosed that LPS could activate STING in a cytosolic DNA‐dependent manner and upregulate the expression of STING in a c‐Myc‐dependent manner, which cooperatively contribute to ALI.

Mitochondria, the most crucial energy-generating organelles in eukaryotic cells, play a pivotal role in regulating energy metabolism. However, their significance extends beyond this, as they are also indispensable in vital life processes such as cell proliferation, differentiation, immune responses, and redox balance. In response to various physiological signals or external stimuli, a sophisticated mitochondrial quality control (MQC) mechanism has evolved, encompassing key processes like mitochondrial biogenesis, mitochondrial dynamics, and mitophagy, which have garnered increasing attention from researchers to unveil their specific molecular mechanisms. In this review, we present a comprehensive summary of the primary mechanisms and functions of key regulators involved in major components of MQC. Furthermore, the critical physiological functions regulated by MQC and its diverse roles in the progression of various systemic diseases have been described in detail. We also discuss agonists or antagonists targeting MQC, aiming to explore potential therapeutic and research prospects by enhancing MQC to stabilize mitochondrial function.