William Robbins

William Robbins

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

25Years (2002-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
4 May 2018 in Science Advances
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GBGermain Boussarie
Germain Boussarie
JBJudith Bakker
Judith Bakker
OWOwen Wangensteen
Owen Wangensteen
SMStefano Mariani
Stefano Mariani
LBLucas Bonnin
Lucas Bonnin
DMDavid Mouillot
David Mouillot
Environmental DNA reveals unsuspected shark diversity and calls for monitoring and protection of residual populations.

1 December 2006 in Current Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WRWilliam Robbins
William Robbins
MHMizue Hisano
Mizue Hisano
SCSean Connolly
Sean Connolly
JCJ. Howard Choat
J. Howard Choat

1 March 2002 in Marine Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CJChoat J.
Choat J.
KCKendall David Clements
Kendall David Clements
WRWilliam Robbins
William Robbins

8 April 2004 in Marine Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JCJohn Choat
John Choat
WRWilliam Robbins
William Robbins
KCKendall David Clements
Kendall David Clements

24 June 2011 in Marine and Freshwater Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DRD. D. Reid
D. D. Reid
WRWilliam Robbins
William Robbins
VPVictor Marten Peddemors
Victor Marten Peddemors
The New South Wales (NSW) government has operated a program of netting beaches for the protection of swimmers and surfers against shark attack since 1937 in Sydney, and since 1949 in Newcastle and Wollongong. The scope and directives of the Shark Meshing Program have remained constant since its inception, with operational modifications in net specifications in 1972, changes in spatial deployment in 1972, 1987 and 1992, and the elimination of winter netting since 1989. This markedly increased meshing effort in 1972, and again in 1987. In the present study, we examine the trends in catch and effort for the period from 1950–1951 to 2009–2010 over this 200-km section of the NSW coast. Significant temporal trends in species, size and sex composition are described herein. Catches were consistently dominated by three shark taxa, hammerhead sharks (Sphyrna spp.), whaler sharks (Carcharhinus spp.) and Australian angel sharks (Squatina australis), although their relative contributions to catches varied over time. Catch per unit effort has significantly declined for five of the most abundant shark taxa over the study period, increasing only for a single taxon, the sevengill shark (Notorynchus cepedianus). Catches of larger, potentially dangerous white sharks (Carcharodon carcharias) and tiger sharks (Galeocerdo cuvier) saw fewer large animals being caught over time. This pattern was not observed across other taxa. Four different monthly trends were observed in landings of the most abundant eight taxa, reflecting differences in the biology of the catch species. The current study also provides useful information on catches and sizes of grey nurse (Carcharias taurus) and white sharks before and after their protection in NSW waters in 1984 and 1998, respectively.

22 September 2015 in Proceedings Of The Royal Society B-Biological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SBSimon J. Brandl
Simon J. Brandl
WRWilliam Robbins
William Robbins
DBDavid R. Bellwood
David R. Bellwood
Patterns of ecological specialization offer invaluable information about ecosystems. Yet, specialization is rarely quantified across several ecological niche axes and variables beyond the link between morphological and dietary specialization have received little attention. Here, we provide a quantitative evaluation of ecological specialization in a coral reef fish assemblage (f. Acanthuridae) along one fundamental and two realized niche axes. Specifically, we examined ecological specialization in 10 surgeonfish species with regards to morphology and two realized niche axes associated with diet and foraging microhabitat utilization using a recently developed multidimensional framework. We then investigated the potential relationships between morphological and behavioural specialization. These relationships differed markedly from the traditional ecomorphological paradigm. While morphological specialization showed no relationship with dietary specialization, it exhibited a strong relationship with foraging microhabitat specialization. However, this relationship was inverted: species with specialized morphologies were microhabitat generalists, whereas generalized morphotypes were microhabitat specialists. Interestingly, this mirrors relationships found in plant–pollinator communities and may also be applicable to other ecosystems, highlighting the potential importance of including niche axes beyond dietary specialization into ecomorphological frameworks. On coral reefs, it appears that morphotypes commonly perceived as most generalized may, in fact, be specialized in exploiting flat and easily accessible microhabitats.