This page has only limited features, please log in for full access.
There is increasing interest in protecting, restoring and creating ‘blue carbon’ ecosystems (BCE; mangroves, tidal marshes and seagrasses) to sequester atmospheric CO2-C and thereby contribute to climate change mitigation. While a growing number of countries aspire to report greenhouse gas emission and carbon sequestration changes from these ecosystems under voluntary international reporting requirements, few countries have domestic policy frameworks that specifically support the quantification and financing of carbon emission abatement through BCE management. Australia, as home to approximately 5–11% of global blue carbon stocks, has a substantial interest in the development of blue carbon policy. Here we assess the potential inclusion of blue carbon within Australia's Emissions Reduction Fund, emphasizing issues and approaches that have global relevance. We used a participatory workshop of scientific experts and carbon industry stakeholders to identify blue carbon management actions that would meet the requirements of the Fund. In total, twelve actions were assessed for their greenhouse gas emission abatement potential and the ability to measure abatement reliably, using a combination of available data and qualitative and quantitative methods, including expert knowledge. We identify and discuss the five most relevant and promising activities, encompassing the protection, restoration and creation of mangroves, tidal marshes and seagrasses. On a per area basis, mean abatement intensity of organic carbon (Corg) was highest for the (re)introduction of tidal flow resulting in establishment of mangrove (13–15 Mg Corg ha−1 yr−1) and tidal marsh (6–8 Mg Corg ha−1 yr−1), followed by land use planning for sea-level rise for the creation of new mangrove habitat (8 Mg Corg ha−1 yr−1). The avoided disturbance of existing mangroves, tidal marshes and seagrasses has the twofold benefit of avoiding remineralisation of existing stocks, plus the future annual abatement associated with the net sequestration of atmospheric CO2-C as Corg with the continued functioning of these BCE. Our approach offers a template that uses best available information to identify options for carbon abatement through management of coastal landscapes, and details current knowledge gaps and important technical aspects that need to be considered for implementation in carbon crediting schemes.
Jeffrey J. Kelleway; Oscar Serrano; Jeffrey Baldock; Rachel Burgess; Toni Cannard; Paul S. Lavery; Catherine E. Lovelock; Peter I. Macreadie; Pere Masqué; Mark Newnham; Neil Saintilan; Andrew D.L. Steven. A national approach to greenhouse gas abatement through blue carbon management. Global Environmental Change 2020, 63, 102083 .
AMA StyleJeffrey J. Kelleway, Oscar Serrano, Jeffrey Baldock, Rachel Burgess, Toni Cannard, Paul S. Lavery, Catherine E. Lovelock, Peter I. Macreadie, Pere Masqué, Mark Newnham, Neil Saintilan, Andrew D.L. Steven. A national approach to greenhouse gas abatement through blue carbon management. Global Environmental Change. 2020; 63 ():102083.
Chicago/Turabian StyleJeffrey J. Kelleway; Oscar Serrano; Jeffrey Baldock; Rachel Burgess; Toni Cannard; Paul S. Lavery; Catherine E. Lovelock; Peter I. Macreadie; Pere Masqué; Mark Newnham; Neil Saintilan; Andrew D.L. Steven. 2020. "A national approach to greenhouse gas abatement through blue carbon management." Global Environmental Change 63, no. : 102083.
Over the past 50 years, the diversity of fisheries types being actively managed has changed from mainly data-rich, industrial sectors to more socially, economically, and environmentally complex multispecies and multisector fisheries. Accompanying this change has been a broadening of management objectives to include social and economic considerations with traditional resource sustainability objectives, the so-called triple bottom line, and the need to include these considerations into harvest strategies. The case of a line fishery in Australia’s Great Barrier Reef is used as a demonstration of the first steps in implementing triple bottom line harvest strategies. This fishery has several disparate sectors including commercial, tourism, and recreation; targets multiple but important reef species; and is undertaken in a World Heritage Site. This work highlights the need for a much-expanded set of objectives elicited from stakeholders that are either included in the trade-off analyses of the different harvest strategies or directly in an optimization. Both options demonstrated that a paradigm shift is required to emphasize representative participatory management systems that assemble teams from quite different backgrounds and viewpoints; use much broader set of objectives; and modify tools and (especially) the data collected within revised monitoring programmes to underpin these tools.
Catherine M Dichmont; Natalie A Dowling; Sean Pascoe; Toni Cannard; Rachel J Pears; Sian Breen; Tom Roberts; George M Leigh; Marc Mangel. Operationalizing triple bottom line harvest strategies. ICES Journal of Marine Science 2020, 78, 731 -742.
AMA StyleCatherine M Dichmont, Natalie A Dowling, Sean Pascoe, Toni Cannard, Rachel J Pears, Sian Breen, Tom Roberts, George M Leigh, Marc Mangel. Operationalizing triple bottom line harvest strategies. ICES Journal of Marine Science. 2020; 78 (2):731-742.
Chicago/Turabian StyleCatherine M Dichmont; Natalie A Dowling; Sean Pascoe; Toni Cannard; Rachel J Pears; Sian Breen; Tom Roberts; George M Leigh; Marc Mangel. 2020. "Operationalizing triple bottom line harvest strategies." ICES Journal of Marine Science 78, no. 2: 731-742.
Policies aiming to preserve vegetated coastal ecosystems (VCE; tidal marshes, mangroves and seagrasses) to mitigate greenhouse gas emissions require national assessments of blue carbon resources. Here, we present organic carbon (C) storage in VCE across Australian climate regions and estimate potential annual CO2 emission benefits of VCE conservation and restoration. Australia contributes 5–11% of the C stored in VCE globally (70–185 Tg C in aboveground biomass, and 1,055–1,540 Tg C in the upper 1 m of soils). Potential CO2 emissions from current VCE losses are estimated at 2.1–3.1 Tg CO2-e yr-1, increasing annual CO2 emissions from land use change in Australia by 12–21%. This assessment, the most comprehensive for any nation to-date, demonstrates the potential of conservation and restoration of VCE to underpin national policy development for reducing greenhouse gas emissions.
Oscar Serrano; Catherine E. Lovelock; Trisha B. Atwood; Peter I. Macreadie; Robert Canto; Stuart Phinn; Ariane Arias-Ortiz; Le Bai; Jeff Baldock; Camila Bedulli; Paul Carnell; Rod M. Connolly; Paul Donaldson; Alba Esteban; Carolyn J. Ewers Lewis; Bradley D. Eyre; Matthew Hayes; Pierre Horwitz; Lindsay B. Hutley; Christopher R. J. Kavazos; Jeffrey J. Kelleway; Gary A. Kendrick; Kieryn Kilminster; Anna Lafratta; Shing Yip Lee; Paul S. Lavery; Damien T. Maher; Núria Marbà; Pere Masque; Miguel A. Mateo; Richard Mount; Peter Ralph; Chris Roelfsema; Mohammad Rozaimi; Radhiyah Ruhon; Cristian Salinas; Jimena Samper-Villarreal; Jonathan Sanderman; Christian Sanders; Isaac Santos; Chris Sharples; Andrew D. L. Steven; Toni Cannard; Stacey Trevathan-Tackett; Carlos M. Duarte. Australian vegetated coastal ecosystems as global hotspots for climate change mitigation. Nature Communications 2019, 10, 1 -10.
AMA StyleOscar Serrano, Catherine E. Lovelock, Trisha B. Atwood, Peter I. Macreadie, Robert Canto, Stuart Phinn, Ariane Arias-Ortiz, Le Bai, Jeff Baldock, Camila Bedulli, Paul Carnell, Rod M. Connolly, Paul Donaldson, Alba Esteban, Carolyn J. Ewers Lewis, Bradley D. Eyre, Matthew Hayes, Pierre Horwitz, Lindsay B. Hutley, Christopher R. J. Kavazos, Jeffrey J. Kelleway, Gary A. Kendrick, Kieryn Kilminster, Anna Lafratta, Shing Yip Lee, Paul S. Lavery, Damien T. Maher, Núria Marbà, Pere Masque, Miguel A. Mateo, Richard Mount, Peter Ralph, Chris Roelfsema, Mohammad Rozaimi, Radhiyah Ruhon, Cristian Salinas, Jimena Samper-Villarreal, Jonathan Sanderman, Christian Sanders, Isaac Santos, Chris Sharples, Andrew D. L. Steven, Toni Cannard, Stacey Trevathan-Tackett, Carlos M. Duarte. Australian vegetated coastal ecosystems as global hotspots for climate change mitigation. Nature Communications. 2019; 10 (1):1-10.
Chicago/Turabian StyleOscar Serrano; Catherine E. Lovelock; Trisha B. Atwood; Peter I. Macreadie; Robert Canto; Stuart Phinn; Ariane Arias-Ortiz; Le Bai; Jeff Baldock; Camila Bedulli; Paul Carnell; Rod M. Connolly; Paul Donaldson; Alba Esteban; Carolyn J. Ewers Lewis; Bradley D. Eyre; Matthew Hayes; Pierre Horwitz; Lindsay B. Hutley; Christopher R. J. Kavazos; Jeffrey J. Kelleway; Gary A. Kendrick; Kieryn Kilminster; Anna Lafratta; Shing Yip Lee; Paul S. Lavery; Damien T. Maher; Núria Marbà; Pere Masque; Miguel A. Mateo; Richard Mount; Peter Ralph; Chris Roelfsema; Mohammad Rozaimi; Radhiyah Ruhon; Cristian Salinas; Jimena Samper-Villarreal; Jonathan Sanderman; Christian Sanders; Isaac Santos; Chris Sharples; Andrew D. L. Steven; Toni Cannard; Stacey Trevathan-Tackett; Carlos M. Duarte. 2019. "Australian vegetated coastal ecosystems as global hotspots for climate change mitigation." Nature Communications 10, no. 1: 1-10.
Sean Pascoe; Toni Cannard; Amara Steven. Offset payments can reduce environmental impacts of urban development. Environmental Science & Policy 2019, 100, 205 -210.
AMA StyleSean Pascoe, Toni Cannard, Amara Steven. Offset payments can reduce environmental impacts of urban development. Environmental Science & Policy. 2019; 100 ():205-210.
Chicago/Turabian StyleSean Pascoe; Toni Cannard; Amara Steven. 2019. "Offset payments can reduce environmental impacts of urban development." Environmental Science & Policy 100, no. : 205-210.
Ecosystem based fisheries management (EBFM) provides a framework to achieve ecological, economic and social sustainability in fisheries. However, developing harvest strategies to achieve these multiple objectives is complex. This is even more so in multi-sector multi-species fisheries. In our study, we develop such harvest strategies for the multi-species Coral Reef Fin Fish Fishery (CRFFF) operating in the waters of Australia’s Great Barrier Reef. The fishery includes recreational, charter and commercial sectors, and is a provider of regional employment and supplier of seafood to both local and export markets. We convened a series of stakeholder workshops and conducted surveys to identify stakeholder objectives and priorities, as well as potential harvest strategy frameworks for the fishery. These potential harvest strategies were assessed against the objectives using a further qualitative impact survey. The analysis identified which frameworks were preferred by different stakeholder groups and why, taking into account the different objective priorities and tradeoffs in outcomes. The new feature of the work was to qualitatively determine which harvest strategies are perceived to best address triple bottom line objectives. The approach is therefore potentially applicable in other complex fisheries developing harvest strategies which, by design, strive to achieve ecological, economic and social sustainability.
Sean Pascoe; Toni Cannard; Natalie Dowling; Catherine Dichmont; Sian Breen; Tom Roberts; Rachel Pears; George Leigh. Developing Harvest Strategies to Achieve Ecological, Economic and Social Sustainability in Multi-Sector Fisheries. Sustainability 2019, 11, 644 .
AMA StyleSean Pascoe, Toni Cannard, Natalie Dowling, Catherine Dichmont, Sian Breen, Tom Roberts, Rachel Pears, George Leigh. Developing Harvest Strategies to Achieve Ecological, Economic and Social Sustainability in Multi-Sector Fisheries. Sustainability. 2019; 11 (3):644.
Chicago/Turabian StyleSean Pascoe; Toni Cannard; Natalie Dowling; Catherine Dichmont; Sian Breen; Tom Roberts; Rachel Pears; George Leigh. 2019. "Developing Harvest Strategies to Achieve Ecological, Economic and Social Sustainability in Multi-Sector Fisheries." Sustainability 11, no. 3: 644.
Blue carbon policy supports carbon sequestration whilst also conserving our remaining seagrass meadows. The complex biogeochemical processes within the sediment of seagrass meadows are responsible for the longevity of the stored carbon. Carbon stock and accumulation rates are controlled by the interaction of hydrodynamic, geochemical and biotic processes unique to each meadow. Carbon content (stock and flux) of a meadow must be quantified for inclusion in carbon accounting, whether for market trading or national greenhouse gas accounting. Management of seagrass blue carbon also requires estimates of additionality, leakage, permanence, conversion and emission factors.
Peter J. Ralph; Joseph Crosswell; T. Cannard; Andrew D. L. Steven. Estimating Seagrass Blue Carbon and Policy Implications: The Australian Perspective. Seagrasses of Australia 2018, 743 -758.
AMA StylePeter J. Ralph, Joseph Crosswell, T. Cannard, Andrew D. L. Steven. Estimating Seagrass Blue Carbon and Policy Implications: The Australian Perspective. Seagrasses of Australia. 2018; ():743-758.
Chicago/Turabian StylePeter J. Ralph; Joseph Crosswell; T. Cannard; Andrew D. L. Steven. 2018. "Estimating Seagrass Blue Carbon and Policy Implications: The Australian Perspective." Seagrasses of Australia , no. : 743-758.
Report cards are increasingly used to provide ongoing snap-shots of progress towards specific ecosystem health goals, particularly in coastal regions where planners need to balance competing demands for coastal resources from a range of industries. While most previous report cards focus on the biophysical components of the system, there is a growing interest in including the social and economic implications of ecosystem management to provide a greater social-ecological system understanding. Such a report card was requested on the Gladstone Harbour area in central Queensland, Australia. Gladstone Harbour adjoins the southern Great Barrier Reef, and is also a major industrial and shipping port. Balancing social, economic and environmental interests is therefore of great concern to the regional managers. While environmental benchmarking procedures are well established within Australia (and elsewhere), a method for assessing social and economic performance of coastal management is generally lacking. The key aim of this study was to develop and pilot a system for the development of a report card relating to appropriate cultural, social and economic objectives. The approach developed uses a range of multicriteria decision analysis methods to assess and combine different qualitative and quantitative measures, including the use of Bayesian Belief Networks to combine the different measures and provide an overall quantitative score for each of the key management objectives. The approach developed is readily transferable for purposes of similar assessments in other regions.
Sean Pascoe; Renae Tobin; Jill Windle; Toni Cannard; Nadine Marshall; Zobaidul Kabir; Nicole Flint. Developing a Social, Cultural and Economic Report Card for a Regional Industrial Harbour. PLOS ONE 2016, 11, e0148271 .
AMA StyleSean Pascoe, Renae Tobin, Jill Windle, Toni Cannard, Nadine Marshall, Zobaidul Kabir, Nicole Flint. Developing a Social, Cultural and Economic Report Card for a Regional Industrial Harbour. PLOS ONE. 2016; 11 (2):e0148271.
Chicago/Turabian StyleSean Pascoe; Renae Tobin; Jill Windle; Toni Cannard; Nadine Marshall; Zobaidul Kabir; Nicole Flint. 2016. "Developing a Social, Cultural and Economic Report Card for a Regional Industrial Harbour." PLOS ONE 11, no. 2: e0148271.
Christian Moeseneder; Leo Dutra; Olivier Thébaud; Nick Ellis; Fabio Boschetti; Sharon Tickell; Cathy Dichmont; William De La Mare; Ricardo Pascual; Toni Cannard. A simulation interface designed for improved user interaction and learning in water quality modelling software. Environmental Modelling & Software 2015, 70, 86 -96.
AMA StyleChristian Moeseneder, Leo Dutra, Olivier Thébaud, Nick Ellis, Fabio Boschetti, Sharon Tickell, Cathy Dichmont, William De La Mare, Ricardo Pascual, Toni Cannard. A simulation interface designed for improved user interaction and learning in water quality modelling software. Environmental Modelling & Software. 2015; 70 ():86-96.
Chicago/Turabian StyleChristian Moeseneder; Leo Dutra; Olivier Thébaud; Nick Ellis; Fabio Boschetti; Sharon Tickell; Cathy Dichmont; William De La Mare; Ricardo Pascual; Toni Cannard. 2015. "A simulation interface designed for improved user interaction and learning in water quality modelling software." Environmental Modelling & Software 70, no. : 86-96.
This paper details Australian research that developed tools to assist fisheries managers and government agencies in engaging with the social dimension of industry and community welfare in fisheries management. These tools are in the form of objectives and indicators. These highlight the social dimensions and the effects of management plans and policy implementation on fishing industries and associated communities, while also taking into account the primacy of ecological imperatives. The deployment of these objectives and indicators initially provides a benchmark and, over the life of a management plan, can subsequently be used to identify trends in effects on a variety of social and economic elements that may be objectives in the management of a fishery. It is acknowledged that the degree to which factors can be monitored will be dependent upon resources of management agencies, however these frameworks provide a method for effectively monitoring and measuring change in the social dimension of fisheries management.Essentially, the work discussed in this paper provides fisheries management with the means to both track and begin to understand the effects of government policy and management plans on the social dimension of the fishing industry and its associated communities. Such tools allow the consideration of these elements, within an evidence base, into policy arrangements, and consequently provide an invaluable contribution to the ability to address resilience and sustainability of fishing industries and associated communities
Kate Brooks; Jacki Schirmer; Sean Pascoe; Lianos Triantafillos; Eddie Jebreen; Toni Cannard; Cathy M. Dichmont. Selecting and assessing social objectives for Australian fisheries management. Marine Policy 2015, 53, 111 -122.
AMA StyleKate Brooks, Jacki Schirmer, Sean Pascoe, Lianos Triantafillos, Eddie Jebreen, Toni Cannard, Cathy M. Dichmont. Selecting and assessing social objectives for Australian fisheries management. Marine Policy. 2015; 53 ():111-122.
Chicago/Turabian StyleKate Brooks; Jacki Schirmer; Sean Pascoe; Lianos Triantafillos; Eddie Jebreen; Toni Cannard; Cathy M. Dichmont. 2015. "Selecting and assessing social objectives for Australian fisheries management." Marine Policy 53, no. : 111-122.
Predicting who may leave a fishery is an important consideration when designing capacity reduction programs to enhance both ecological and economic sustainability. In this paper, the relationship between satisfaction and the desire to exit a fishery is examined for the Queensland East Coast Trawl fishery. Income from fishing, and changes in income over the last 5 years, were key factors affecting overall satisfaction. Relative income per se was not a significant factor, counter to most satisfaction studies. Continuing a family tradition of fishing and, for one group, pride in being a fisher was found to be significant. Satisfaction with fishing overall and the challenge of fishing were found to be the primary drivers of the desire to stay or leave the fishery. Surprisingly, public perceptions of fishing, trust in management and perceptions of equity in resource allocation did not significantly affect overall satisfaction or the desire to exit the fishery.
Sean Pascoe; Toni Cannard; Eddie Jebreen; Catherine M. Dichmont; Jacki Schirmer. Satisfaction with fishing and the desire to leave. Ambio 2014, 44, 401 -411.
AMA StyleSean Pascoe, Toni Cannard, Eddie Jebreen, Catherine M. Dichmont, Jacki Schirmer. Satisfaction with fishing and the desire to leave. Ambio. 2014; 44 (5):401-411.
Chicago/Turabian StyleSean Pascoe; Toni Cannard; Eddie Jebreen; Catherine M. Dichmont; Jacki Schirmer. 2014. "Satisfaction with fishing and the desire to leave." Ambio 44, no. 5: 401-411.
Increasingly, social considerations are having an influence on fisheries policy as well as day-to-day management decision making. Social objectives, unlike economic or conservation objectives, are often poorly defined in fisheries policy, providing substantial leeway for managers to develop management plans in response to the perceived importance of different social outcomes, and potential inconsistencies between different fisheries and jurisdictions. In this paper, through a literature review and workshop with managers across different Australian jurisdictions, we develop a set of social objectives that may be applicable in Australian fisheries. We assess the importance of these different objectives using the Analytic Hierarchy Process, and find considerable diversity in opinion as to which social objectives fisheries management should prioritise to achieve. This diversity of opinion is not directly related to jurisdiction, but does seem related to the context and social environment in which fisheries managers are operating
Sean Pascoe; Kate Brooks; Toni Cannard; Catherine M. Dichmont; Eddie Jebreen; Jacki Schirmer; Lianos Triantafillos. Social objectives of fisheries management: What are managers' priorities? Ocean & Coastal Management 2014, 98, 1 -10.
AMA StyleSean Pascoe, Kate Brooks, Toni Cannard, Catherine M. Dichmont, Eddie Jebreen, Jacki Schirmer, Lianos Triantafillos. Social objectives of fisheries management: What are managers' priorities? Ocean & Coastal Management. 2014; 98 ():1-10.
Chicago/Turabian StyleSean Pascoe; Kate Brooks; Toni Cannard; Catherine M. Dichmont; Eddie Jebreen; Jacki Schirmer; Lianos Triantafillos. 2014. "Social objectives of fisheries management: What are managers' priorities?" Ocean & Coastal Management 98, no. : 1-10.
Olivier Thébaud; James Innes; Ana Norman-López; Stephanie Slade; Darren Cameron; Toni Cannard; Sharon Tickell; John Kung; Brigid Kerrigan; Lew Williams; L. Richard Little. Micro-economic drivers of profitability in an ITQ-managed fishery: An analysis of the Queensland Coral Reef Fin-Fish Fishery. Marine Policy 2014, 43, 200 -207.
AMA StyleOlivier Thébaud, James Innes, Ana Norman-López, Stephanie Slade, Darren Cameron, Toni Cannard, Sharon Tickell, John Kung, Brigid Kerrigan, Lew Williams, L. Richard Little. Micro-economic drivers of profitability in an ITQ-managed fishery: An analysis of the Queensland Coral Reef Fin-Fish Fishery. Marine Policy. 2014; 43 ():200-207.
Chicago/Turabian StyleOlivier Thébaud; James Innes; Ana Norman-López; Stephanie Slade; Darren Cameron; Toni Cannard; Sharon Tickell; John Kung; Brigid Kerrigan; Lew Williams; L. Richard Little. 2014. "Micro-economic drivers of profitability in an ITQ-managed fishery: An analysis of the Queensland Coral Reef Fin-Fish Fishery." Marine Policy 43, no. : 200-207.
Conventional systems of government have not been very successful in resolving coastal management problems. This lack of progress is partially attributable to inadequate representation in governance processes of the variety of knowledges present on the coast. In particular there has been a struggle to engage effectively with climate science and its implications. There has also been a broader failure to capture the complexity of voices, interests, values, and discourses of coastal users. We argue here that coastal governance challenges are not likely to be resolved by singular solutions; rather, interaction and collaboration will generate improvements. We suggest that a co-requisite for progress in coastal management is the development of institutions and processes that enable different knowledges to have a bearing on governance processes. This paper examines a selection of the many opportunities available to broaden and enhance the use of knowledge in decision-making for the coast. A description is provided of emerging elements of coastal governance from an Australian perspective, together with new types of institutions, processes, tools and techniques that may help to achieve an improved coastal knowledge-governance interaction
Beverley Clarke; Laura Stocker; Brian Coffey; Peat Leith; Nick Harvey; Claudia Baldwin; Tom Baxter; Gonni Bruekers; Chiara Danese Galano; Meg Good; Marcus Haward; Carolyn Hofmeester; Debora Martins de Freitas; Taryn Mumford; Melissa Nursey-Bray; Lorne Kriwoken; Jenny Shaw; Janette Shaw; Timothy Smith; Dana Thomsen; David Wood; Toni Cannard. Enhancing the knowledge–governance interface: Coasts, climate and collaboration. Ocean & Coastal Management 2013, 86, 88 -99.
AMA StyleBeverley Clarke, Laura Stocker, Brian Coffey, Peat Leith, Nick Harvey, Claudia Baldwin, Tom Baxter, Gonni Bruekers, Chiara Danese Galano, Meg Good, Marcus Haward, Carolyn Hofmeester, Debora Martins de Freitas, Taryn Mumford, Melissa Nursey-Bray, Lorne Kriwoken, Jenny Shaw, Janette Shaw, Timothy Smith, Dana Thomsen, David Wood, Toni Cannard. Enhancing the knowledge–governance interface: Coasts, climate and collaboration. Ocean & Coastal Management. 2013; 86 ():88-99.
Chicago/Turabian StyleBeverley Clarke; Laura Stocker; Brian Coffey; Peat Leith; Nick Harvey; Claudia Baldwin; Tom Baxter; Gonni Bruekers; Chiara Danese Galano; Meg Good; Marcus Haward; Carolyn Hofmeester; Debora Martins de Freitas; Taryn Mumford; Melissa Nursey-Bray; Lorne Kriwoken; Jenny Shaw; Janette Shaw; Timothy Smith; Dana Thomsen; David Wood; Toni Cannard. 2013. "Enhancing the knowledge–governance interface: Coasts, climate and collaboration." Ocean & Coastal Management 86, no. : 88-99.
Social, cultural and economic measurements of indicator status for the Gladstone Healthy Harbours data for report card 2014
Sean Pascoe; Renae Tobin; Jill Windle; Toni Cannard; Nadine Marshall; Zobaidul Kabir; Nicole Flint. Gladstone Healthy Harbours data for report card 2014. 2021, 1 .
AMA StyleSean Pascoe, Renae Tobin, Jill Windle, Toni Cannard, Nadine Marshall, Zobaidul Kabir, Nicole Flint. Gladstone Healthy Harbours data for report card 2014. . 2021; ():1.
Chicago/Turabian StyleSean Pascoe; Renae Tobin; Jill Windle; Toni Cannard; Nadine Marshall; Zobaidul Kabir; Nicole Flint. 2021. "Gladstone Healthy Harbours data for report card 2014." , no. : 1.