Robert Schneider

Robert Schneider


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
9 September 2016 in Frontiers in Molecular Biosciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LMLuca Mollica
Luca Mollica
LBLuiza M. Bessa
Luiza M. Bessa
XHXavier Hanoulle
Xavier Hanoulle
MJMalene Ringkjobing Jensen
Malene Ringkjobing Jensen
MBMartin Blackledge
Martin Blackledge
RSRobert Schneider
Robert Schneider
In recent years, protein science has been revolutionized by the discovery of intrinsically disordered proteins (IDPs). In contrast to the classical paradigm that a given protein sequence corresponds to a defined structure and an associated function, we now know that proteins can be functional in the absence of a stable three-dimensional structure. In many cases, disordered proteins or protein regions become structured, at least locally, upon interacting with their physiological partners. Many, sometimes conflicting, hypotheses have been put forward regarding the interaction mechanisms of IDPs and the potential advantages of disorder for protein-protein interactions. Whether disorder may increase, as proposed e.g. in the "fly-casting" hypothesis, or decrease binding rates, increase or decrease binding specificity, or what role pre-formed structure might play in interactions involving IDPs (conformational selection vs. induced fit), are subjects of intense debate. Experimentally, these questions remain difficult to address. Here, we review experimental studies of binding mechanisms of IDPs using NMR spectroscopy and transient kinetic techniques, as well as the underlying theoretical concepts and numerical methods that can be applied to describe these interactions at the atomic level. The available literature suggests that the kinetic and thermodynamic parameters characterizing interactions involving IDPs can vary widely and that there may be no single common mechanism that can explain the different binding modes observed experimentally. Rather, disordered proteins appear to make combined use of features such as pre-formed structure and flexibility, depending on the individual system and the functional context.

31 December 2014 in Journal of the American Chemical Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RSRobert Schneider
Robert Schneider
DMDamien Maurin
Damien Maurin
GCGuillaume Communie
Guillaume Communie
JKJaka Kragelj
Jaka Kragelj
DHD. Flemming Hansen
D. Flemming Hansen
MBMartin Blackledge
Martin Blackledge

20 August 2012 in Journal of the American Chemical Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
VOValéry Ozenne
Valéry Ozenne
RSRobert Schneider
Robert Schneider
MYMingxi Yao
Mingxi Yao
JHJie-rong Huang
Jie-rong Huang
LSLoïc Salmon
Loïc Salmon
MBMartin Blackledge
Martin Blackledge

8 December 2008 in Journal of the American Chemical Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CAChristian Ader
Christian Ader
RSRobert Schneider
Robert Schneider
KSKarsten Seidel
Karsten Seidel
MEManuel Etzkorn
Manuel Etzkorn
SBStefan Becker
Stefan Becker
MBMarc Baldus
Marc Baldus

9 May 2017 in Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JGJeremy Guérin
Jeremy Guérin
SBSarah Bigot
Sarah Bigot
RSRobert Schneider
Robert Schneider
SBSusan K. Buchanan
Susan K. Buchanan
FJFrançoise Jacob-Dubuisson
Françoise Jacob-Dubuisson
Initially identified in pathogenic Gram-negative bacteria, the two-partner secretion (TPS) pathway, also known as Type Vb secretion, mediates the translocation across the outer membrane of large effector proteins involved in interactions between these pathogens and their hosts. More recently, distinct TPS systems have been shown to secrete toxic effector domains that participate in inter-bacterial competition or cooperation. The effects of these systems are based on kin versus non-kin molecular recognition mediated by specific immunity proteins. With these new toxin-antitoxin systems, the range of TPS effector functions has thus been extended from cytolysis, adhesion and iron acquisition to genome maintenance, inter-bacterial killing and inter-bacterial signaling. Basically, a TPS system is made up of two proteins, the secreted TpsA effector protein and its TpsB partner transporter, with possible additional factors such as immunity proteins for protection against cognate toxic effectors. Structural studies have indicated that TpsA proteins mainly form elongated β helices that may be followed by specific functional domains. TpsB proteins belong to the Omp85 superfamily. Open questions remain on the mechanism of protein secretion in the absence of ATP or an electrochemical gradient across the outer membrane. The remarkable dynamics of TpsB transporters and the progressive folding of their TpsA partners at the bacterial surface in the course of translocation are thought to be key elements driving the secretion process.

1 February 2019 in Current Opinion in Structural Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RSRobert Schneider
Robert Schneider
MBMartin Blackledge
Martin Blackledge
MJMalene Ringkjobing Jensen
Malene Ringkjobing Jensen