Lior Blank

Dr. Lior Blank

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

24Years (2003-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 August 2013 in Building and Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LBLior Blank
Lior Blank
AVAmiel Vasl
Amiel Vasl
SLShay Levy
Shay Levy
GGGary Grant
Gary Grant
GKGyongyver Kadas
Gyongyver Kadas
LBLeon Blaustein
Leon Blaustein

24 April 2013 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YCYohay Carmel
Yohay Carmel
RKRafi Kent
Rafi Kent
ABAvi Bar-Massada
Avi Bar-Massada
LBLior Blank
Lior Blank
JLJonathan Liberzon
Jonathan Liberzon
RFRoy Federman
Roy Federman
It is thought that the science of ecology has experienced conceptual shifts in recent decades, chiefly from viewing nature as static and balanced to a conception of constantly changing, unpredictable, complex ecosystems. Here, we ask if these changes are reflected in actual ecological research over the last 30 years. We surveyed 750 articles from the entire pool of ecological literature and 750 articles from eight leading journals. Each article was characterized according to its type, ecological domain, and applicability, and major topics. We found that, in contrast to its common image, ecology is still mostly a study of single species (70% of the studies); while ecosystem and community studies together comprise only a quarter of ecological research. Ecological science is somewhat conservative in its topics of research (about a third of all topics changed significantly through time), as well as in its basic methodologies and approaches. However, the growing proportion of problem-solving studies (from 9% in the 1980s to 20% in the 2000 s) may represent a major transition in ecological science in the long run.

1 July 2020 in Forests
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RDRein Drenkhan
Rein Drenkhan
BGBeccy Ganley
Beccy Ganley
JMJorge Martín-García
Jorge Martín-García
PVPetr Vahalík
Petr Vahalík
KAKalev Adamson
Kalev Adamson
MMMartin Mullett
Martin Mullett
Fusarium circinatum, the causal agent of pine pitch canker (PPC), is currently one of the most important threats of Pinus spp. globally. This pathogen is known in many pine-growing regions, including natural and planted forests, and can affect all life stages of trees, from emerging seedlings to mature trees. Despite the importance of PPC, the global distribution of F. circinatum is poorly documented, and this problem is also true of the hosts within countries that are affected. The aim of this study was to review the global distribution of F. circinatum, with a particular focus on Europe. We considered (1) the current and historical pathogen records, both positive and negative, based on confirmed reports from Europe and globally; (2) the genetic diversity and population structure of the pathogen; (3) the current distribution of PPC in Europe, comparing published models of predicted disease distribution; and (4) host susceptibility by reviewing literature and generating a comprehensive list of known hosts for the fungus. These data were collated from 41 countries and used to compile a specially constructed geo-database. A review of 6297 observation records showed that F. circinatum and the symptoms it causes on conifers occurred in 14 countries, including four in Europe, and is absent in 28 countries. Field observations and experimental data from 138 host species revealed 106 susceptible host species including 85 Pinus species, 6 non-pine tree species and 15 grass and herb species. Our data confirm that susceptibility to F. circinatum varies between different host species, tree ages and environmental characteristics. Knowledge on the geographic distribution, host range and the relative susceptibility of different hosts is essential for disease management, mitigation and containment strategies. The findings reported in this review will support countries that are currently free of F. circinatum in implementing effective procedures and restrictions and prevent further spread of the pathogen.

8 April 2019 in Nature Plants
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MBMuthukumar Bagavathiannan
Muthukumar Bagavathiannan
SGSonia Graham
Sonia Graham
ZMZhao Ma
Zhao Ma
JBJacob N. Barney
Jacob N. Barney
SCShaun R. Coutts
Shaun R. Coutts
Hugh BeckieHugh Beckie
Hugh Beckie
Weeds pose severe threats to agricultural and natural landscapes worldwide. One major reason for the failure to effectively manage weeds at landscape scales is that current Best Management Practice guidelines, and research on how to improve such guidelines, focus too narrowly on property-level management decisions. Insufficiently considered are the aggregate effects of individual actions to determine landscape-scale outcomes, or whether there are collective practices that would improve weed management outcomes. Here, we frame landscape-scale weed management as a social dilemma, where trade-offs occur between individual and collective interests. We apply a transdisciplinary system approach—integrating the perspectives of ecologists, evolutionary biologists and agronomists into a social science theory of social dilemmas—to four landscape-scale weed management challenges: (i) achieving plant biosecurity, (ii) preventing weed seed contamination, (iii) maintaining herbicide susceptibility and (iv) sustainably using biological control. We describe how these four challenges exhibit characteristics of ‘public good problems’, wherein effective weed management requires the active contributions of multiple actors, while benefits are not restricted to these contributors. Adequate solutions to address these public good challenges often involve a subset of the eight design principles developed by Elinor Ostrom for ‘common pool social dilemmas’, together with design principles that reflect the public good nature of the problems. This paper is a call to action for scholars and practitioners to broaden our conceptualization and approaches to weed management problems. Such progress begins by evaluating the public good characteristics of specific weed management challenges and applying context-specific design principles to realize successful and sustainable weed management.

27 April 2012 in Hydrobiologia
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
LBLior Blank
Lior Blank
LBLeon Blaustein
Leon Blaustein

5 January 2017 in Urban Ecosystems
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
LBLior Blank
Lior Blank
AVAmiel Vasl
Amiel Vasl
BSBracha Y. Schindler
Bracha Y. Schindler
GKGyongyver J. Kadas
Gyongyver J. Kadas
LBLeon Blaustein
Leon Blaustein