Faustino Mollinedo

Prof. Dr. Faustino Mollinedo

Laboratory of Cell Death and Cancer Therapy, Department of Molecular Biomedicine, Centro de Investigaciones Biológicas (CIB), Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas (CSIC), Madrid, Spain.
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

37Years (1990-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 March 2019 in Trends in Immunology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
FMFaustino Mollinedo
Faustino Mollinedo

1 May 2020 in Journal of Lipid Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FMFaustino Mollinedo
Faustino Mollinedo
CGConsuelo Gajate
Consuelo Gajate
Faustino Mollinedo, Consuelo Gajate

22 August 2017 in PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JVJanny A. Villa-Pulgarín
Janny A. Villa-Pulgarín
CGConsuelo Gajate
Consuelo Gajate
JBJavier Botet
Javier Botet
AJAlberto Jiménez
Alberto Jiménez
NJNicole Justies
Nicole Justies
FMFaustino Mollinedo
Faustino Mollinedo
Leishmaniasis is the world’s second deadliest parasitic disease after malaria, and current treatment of the different forms of this disease is far from satisfactory. Alkylphospholipid analogs (APLs) are a family of anticancer drugs that show antileishmanial activity, including the first oral drug (miltefosine) for leishmaniasis and drugs in preclinical/clinical oncology trials, but their precise mechanism of action remains to be elucidated. Here we show that the tumor cell apoptosis-inducer edelfosine was the most effective APL, as compared to miltefosine, perifosine and erucylphosphocholine, in killing Leishmania spp. promastigotes and amastigotes as well as tumor cells, as assessed by DNA breakdown determined by flow cytometry. In studies using animal models, we found that orally-administered edelfosine showed a potent in vivo antileishmanial activity and diminished macrophage pro-inflammatory responses. Edelfosine was also able to kill Leishmania axenic amastigotes. Edelfosine was taken up by host macrophages and killed intracellular Leishmania amastigotes in infected macrophages. Edelfosine accumulated in tumor cell mitochondria and Leishmania kinetoplast-mitochondrion, and led to mitochondrial transmembrane potential disruption, and to the successive breakdown of parasite mitochondrial and nuclear DNA. Ectopic expression of Bcl-XL inhibited edelfosine-induced cell death in both Leishmania parasites and tumor cells. We found that the cytotoxic activity of edelfosine against Leishmania parasites and tumor cells was associated with a dramatic recruitment of FOF1-ATP synthase into lipid rafts following edelfosine treatment in both parasites and cancer cells. Raft disruption and specific FOF1-ATP synthase inhibition hindered edelfosine-induced cell death in both Leishmania parasites and tumor cells. Genetic deletion of FOF1-ATP synthase led to edelfosine drug resistance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae yeast. The present study shows that the antileishmanial and anticancer actions of edelfosine share some common signaling processes, with mitochondria and raft-located FOF1-ATP synthase being critical in the killing process, thus identifying novel druggable targets for the treatment of leishmaniasis. Leishmaniasis is a major health problem worldwide, and can result in loss of human life or a lifelong stigma because of bodily scars. According to World Health Organization, leishmaniasis is considered as an emerging and uncontrolled disease, and its current treatment is far from ideal, with only a few drugs available that could lead to drug resistance or cause serious side-effects. Here, we have found that mitochondria and raft-located FOF1-ATPase synthase are efficient druggable targets, through which an ether lipid named edelfosine exerts its antileishmanial action. Edelfosine effectively kills Leishmania spp. promastigotes and amastigotes. Our experimental animal models demonstrate that oral administration of edelfosine exerts a potent antileishmanial activity, while inhibits macrophage pro-inflammatory responses. Our results show that both Leishmania and tumor cells share mitochondria and raft-located FOF1-ATPase synthase as major druggable targets in leishmaniasis and cancer therapy. These data, showing a potent antileishmanial activity of edelfosine and unveiling its mechanism of action, together with the inhibition of the inflammatory responses elicited by macrophages, suggest that the ether lipid edelfosine is a promising oral drug for leishmaniasis, and highlight mitochondria and lipid raft-located FOF1-ATP synthase as major therapeutic targets for the treatment of this disease.

15 June 2021 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
RGRósula García-Navas
Rósula García-Navas
CGConsuelo Gajate
Consuelo Gajate
FMFaustino Mollinedo
Faustino Mollinedo
Human neutrophils constitutively express high amounts of arginase-1, which depletes arginine from the surrounding medium and downregulates T-cell activation. Here, we have found that neutrophil arginase-1, released from activated human neutrophils or dead cells, induced apoptosis in cancer cells through an endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress pathway. Silencing of PERK in cancer cells prevented the induction of ER stress and apoptosis. Arginase inhibitor Nω-hydroxy-nor-arginine inhibited apoptosis and ER stress response induced by conditioned medium from activated neutrophils. A number of tumor cell lines, derived from different tissues, were sensitive to neutrophil arginase-1, with pancreatic, breast, ovarian and lung cancer cells showing the highest sensitivity. Neutrophil-released arginase-1 and arginine deprivation potentiated the antitumor action against pancreatic cancer cells of the ER-targeted antitumor alkylphospholipid analog edelfosine. Our study demonstrates the involvement of neutrophil arginase-1 in cancer cell killing and highlights the importance and complex role of neutrophils in tumor surveillance and biology.

22 February 2021 in Critical Care Explorations
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
IMIrene Mollinedo-Gajate
Irene Mollinedo-Gajate
FVFelipe Villar-Álvarez
Felipe Villar-Álvarez
MZMaría de Los Ángeles Zambrano-Chacón
María de Los Ángeles Zambrano-Chacón
LNLaura Núñez-García
Laura Núñez-García
LDLaura de la Dueña-Muñoz
Laura de la Dueña-Muñoz
FMFaustino Mollinedo
Faustino Mollinedo
Objectives: This study aims to determine similarities and differences in clinical characteristics between the patients from two waves of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection at the time of hospital admission, as well as to identify risk biomarkers of coronavirus disease 2019 severity. Design: Retrospective observational study. Setting: A single tertiary-care center in Madrid. Patients: Coronavirus disease 2019 adult patients admitted to hospital from March 4, 2020, to March 25, 2020 (first infection wave), and during July 18, 2020, and August 20, 2020 (second infection wave). Interventions: Treatment with a hospital-approved drug cocktail during hospitalization. Measurements and Main Results: Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were compared between the patients with moderate and critical/fatal illness across both infection waves. The median age of patients with critical/fatal coronavirus disease 2019 was 67.5 years (interquartile range, 56.75–78.25 yr; 64.5% male) in the first wave and 59.0 years (interquartile range, 48.25–80.50 yr; 70.8% male) in the second wave. Hypertension and dyslipidemia were major comorbidities in both waves. Body mass index over 25 and presence of bilateral pneumonia were common findings. Univariate logistic regression analyses revealed an association of a number of blood parameters with the subsequent illness progression and severity in both waves. However, some remarkable differences were detected between both waves that prevented an accurate extrapolation of prediction models from the first wave into the second wave. Interleukin-6 and d-dimer concentrations at the time of hospital admission were remarkably higher in patients who developed a critical/fatal condition only during the first wave (p < 0.001), although both parameters significantly increased with disease worsening in follow-up studies from both waves. Multivariate analyses from wave 1 rendered a predictive signature for critical/fatal illness upon hospital admission that comprised six blood biomarkers: neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (≥ 5; odds ratio, 2.684 [95% CI, 1.143–6.308]), C-reactive protein (≥ 15.2 mg/dL; odds ratio, 2.412 [95% CI, 1.006–5.786]), lactate dehydrogenase (≥ 411.96 U/L; odds ratio, 2.875 [95% CI, 1.229–6.726]), interleukin-6 (≥ 78.8 pg/mL; odds ratio, 5.737 [95% CI, 2.432–13.535]), urea (≥ 40 mg/dL; odds ratio, 1.701 [95% CI, 0.737–3.928]), and d-dimer (≥ 713 ng/mL; odds ratio, 1.903 [95% CI, 0.832–4.356]). The predictive accuracy of the signature was 84% and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.886. When the signature was validated with data from wave 2, the accuracy was 81% and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve value was 0.874, albeit most biomarkers lost their independent significance. Follow-up studies reassured the importance of monitoring the biomarkers included in the signature, since dramatic increases in the levels of such biomarkers occurred in critical/fatal patients over disease progression. Conclusions: Most parameters analyzed behaved similarly in the two waves of coronavirus disease 2019. However, univariate logistic regression conducted in both waves revealed differences in some parameters associated with poor prognosis in wave 1 that were not found in wave 2, which may reflect a different disease stage of patients on arrival to hospital. The six-biomarker predictive signature reported here constitutes a helpful tool to classify patient’s prognosis on arrival to hospital.

1 July 2019 in Annals of Translational Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FMFaustino Mollinedo
Faustino Mollinedo
CGConsuelo Gajate
Consuelo Gajate
Novel therapeutic approaches for pancreatic cancer by combined targeting of RAF→MEK→ERK signaling and autophagy survival response