Martin Lukac

Prof. Martin Lukac

School of Agriculture, Policy & Development, University of Reading, Reading RG6 6EU, UK
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

26Years (2001-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
5 December 2005 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
RNRichard J. Norby
Richard J. Norby
EDEvan H. DeLucia
Evan H. DeLucia
BGBirgit Gielen
Birgit Gielen
CCCarlo Calfapietra
Carlo Calfapietra
CGChristian P. Giardina
Christian P. Giardina
RORam Oren
Ram Oren
Climate change predictions derived from coupled carbon-climate models are highly dependent on assumptions about feedbacks between the biosphere and atmosphere. One critical feedback occurs if C uptake by the biosphere increases in response to the fossil-fuel driven increase in atmospheric [CO2] (“CO2fertilization”), thereby slowing the rate of increase in atmospheric [CO2]. Carbon exchanges between the terrestrial biosphere and atmosphere are often first represented in models as net primary productivity (NPP). However, the contribution of CO2fertilization to the future global C cycle has been uncertain, especially in forest ecosystems that dominate global NPP, and models that include a feedback between terrestrial biosphere metabolism and atmospheric [CO2] are poorly constrained by experimental evidence. We analyzed the response of NPP to elevated CO2(≈550 ppm) in four free-air CO2enrichment experiments in forest stands. We show that the response of forest NPP to elevated [CO2] is highly conserved across a broad range of productivity, with a stimulation at the median of 23 ± 2%. At low leaf area indices, a large portion of the response was attributable to increased light absorption, but as leaf area indices increased, the response to elevated [CO2] was wholly caused by increased light-use efficiency. The surprising consistency of response across diverse sites provides a benchmark to evaluate predictions of ecosystem and global models and allows us now to focus on unresolved questions about carbon partitioning and retention, and spatial variation in NPP response caused by availability of other growth limiting resources.

7 November 2020 in New Phytologist
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GFGrégoire T. Freschet
Grégoire T. Freschet
CRCatherine Roumet
Catherine Roumet
LCLouise Comas
Louise Comas
MWMonique Weemstra
Monique Weemstra
ABA. Glyn Bengough
A. Glyn Bengough
ASAlexia Stokes
Alexia Stokes
Summary: The effects of plants on the biosphere, atmosphere and geosphere are key determinants of terrestrial ecosystem functioning. However, despite substantial progress made regarding plant belowground components, we are still only beginning to explore the complex relationships between root traits and functions. Drawing on the literature in plant physiology, ecophysiology, ecology, agronomy and soil science, we reviewed 24 aspects of plant and ecosystem functioning and their relationships with a number of root system traits, including aspects of architecture, physiology, morphology, anatomy, chemistry, biomechanics and biotic interactions. Based on this assessment, we critically evaluated the current strengths and gaps in our knowledge, and identify future research challenges in the field of root ecology. Most importantly, we found that belowground traits with the broadest importance in plant and ecosystem functioning are not those most commonly measured. Also, the estimation of trait relative importance for functioning requires us to consider a more comprehensive range of functionally relevant traits from a diverse range of species, across environments and over time series. We also advocate that establishing causal hierarchical links among root traits will provide a hypothesis‐based framework to identify the most parsimonious sets of traits with the strongest links on functions, and to link genotypes to plant and ecosystem functioning.

1 March 2006 in Plant and Soil
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DGDouglas L. Godbold
Douglas L. Godbold
MHMarcel Ronald Hoosbeek
Marcel Ronald Hoosbeek
Martin LukacMartin Lukac
Martin Lukac
MCM. Francesca Cotrufo
M. Francesca Cotrufo
IJIvan A. Janssens
Ivan A. Janssens
APAlessandro Peressotti
Alessandro Peressotti

8 July 2012 in Plant and Soil
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
IBIvano Brunner
Ivano Brunner
MBM. R. Bakker
M. R. Bakker
RBR. G. Björk
R. G. Björk
YHY. Hirano
Y. Hirano
Martin LukacMartin Lukac
Martin Lukac
IOIvika Ostonen-Märtin
Ivika Ostonen-Märtin
Forest trees directly contribute to carbon cycling in forest soils through the turnover of their fine roots. In this study we aimed to calculate root turnover rates of common European forest tree species and to compare them with most frequently published values.

6 June 2017 in New Phytologist
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
IOIvika Ostonen-Märtin
Ivika Ostonen-Märtin
MTMarika Truu
Marika Truu
HHHeljä‐Sisko Helmisaari
Heljä‐Sisko Helmisaari
Martin LukacMartin Lukac
Martin Lukac
WBWerner Borken
Werner Borken
JTJaak Truu
Jaak Truu

8 May 2018 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SMSyed Amir Manzoor
Syed Amir Manzoor
GGGeoffrey Griffiths
Geoffrey Griffiths
Martin LukacMartin Lukac
Martin Lukac
Species distribution models have been used to predict the distribution of invasive species for conservation planning. Understanding spatial transferability of niche predictions is critical to promote species-habitat conservation and forecasting areas vulnerable to invasion. Grain size of predictor variables is an important factor affecting the accuracy and transferability of species distribution models. Choice of grain size is often dependent on the type of predictor variables used and the selection of predictors sometimes rely on data availability. This study employed the MAXENT species distribution model to investigate the effect of the grain size on model transferability for an invasive plant species. We modelled the distribution ofRhododendron ponticumin Wales, U.K. and tested model performance and transferability by varying grain size (50 m, 300 m, and 1 km). MAXENT-based models are sensitive to grain size and selection of variables. We found that over-reliance on the commonly used bioclimatic variables may lead to less accurate models as it often compromises the finer grain size of biophysical variables which may be more important determinants of species distribution at small spatial scales. Model accuracy is likely to increase with decreasing grain size. However, successful model transferability may require optimization of model grain size.