Jean de la Rosette

Jean de la Rosette


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

29Years (1998-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 January 2011 in Journal of Endourology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JRJean de la Rosette
Jean de la Rosette
DADean Assimos
Dean Assimos
MDMahesh Desai
Mahesh Desai
JGJorge Gutierrez
Jorge Gutierrez
JLJames Lingeman
James Lingeman
ATAhmet Tefekli
Ahmet Tefekli
Purpose: To assess the current indications, perioperative morbidity, and stone-free outcomes for percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) worldwide. Patients and Methods: The Clinical Research Office of the Endourological Society (CROES) collected prospective data for consecutive patients who were treated with PCNL at centers around the world for 1 year. PCNL was performed according to study protocol and local clinical practice guidelines. Stone load and location were recorded, and postoperative complications were graded according to the modified Clavien grading system. Results: Between November 2007 and December 2009, 5803 patients were treated at 96 centers in Europe, Asia, North America, South America, and Australia. Staghorn calculus was present in 1466 (27.5%) patients, and 940, 956, and 2603 patients had stones in the upper, interpolar, and lower pole calices, respectively. The majority of procedures (85.5%) were uneventful. Major procedure-related complications included significant bleeding (7.8%), renal pelvis perforation (3.4%), and hydrothorax (1.8%). Blood transfusion was administered in 328 (5.7%) patients, and fever >38.5°C occurred in 10.5% of patients. The distribution of scores in modified Clavien grades was: No complication (79.5%), I (11.1%), II (5.3%), IIIa (2.3%), IIIb (1.3%), IVa (0.3%), IVb (0.2%), or V (0.03%). At follow-up. the 30-day stone-free rate was 75.7%, and 84.5% of patients did not need additional treatment. Conclusion: With a high success rate and a low major complication rate, PCNL is an effective and safe technique overall for minimally invasive removal of kidney stones.

1 August 2012 in European Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JRJean de la Rosette
Jean de la Rosette
DODedan Opondo
Dedan Opondo
FDFrancisco P.J. Daels
Francisco P.J. Daels
GGGuido Giusti
Guido Giusti
ÁSÁlvaro Serrano
Álvaro Serrano
SGStavros Gravas
Stavros Gravas

1 June 2011 in Journal of Endourology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AYAkito Yamaguchi
Akito Yamaguchi
ASAndreas Skolarikos
Andreas Skolarikos
NBNiels-Peter Noor Buchholz
Niels-Peter Noor Buchholz
GCGonzalo Bueno Chomón
Gonzalo Bueno Chomón
MGMichael Grasso
Michael Grasso
JRJean de la Rosette
Jean de la Rosette
Purpose: The study investigated factors that affect operating times and bleeding complications associated with percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the PCNL Global Study. Patients and Methods: All patients who underwent PCNL for primary or secondary treatment of kidney stone indications during the study period (November 2007–December 2009) were eligible for inclusion. PCNL procedures were performed according to local clinical guidelines and practices. Nephrostomy tract dilation was performed using balloon dilation, metal telescopic dilation, or Amplatz serial dilation. Hematologic complications assessed included bleeding rates, transfusion rates, and preoperative and postoperative hematocrit values. Results: The median operating time with balloon dilation (n=2277) was significantly longer than with telescopic/serial dilation (n=3260) at 94.0 vs 60.0 minutes, respectively (P<0.0001). In the balloon dilation group, there was significantly more bleeding (9.4% vs 6.7%, respectively; P<0.0001) and more transfusions (7.0% vs 4.9%, respectively; P=0.001) compared with the telescopic/serial dilator group. Univariate analysis showed that the probability of bleeding complications was higher with balloon vs telescopic/serial dilation (odds ratio [OR] 1.75; P=0.0001) and larger sheath size (OR 1.42; P=0.0001). By multivariate analysis, sheath size but not dilation method was predictive of bleeding complications. Other significant predictive factors included operating time, stone load, and caseload. Conclusion: This study shows that in PCNL, factors that are associated with bleeding/transfusion include sheath size, operating time, stone load, and caseload.

1 July 2014 in European Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
ECEnrique Perez Castro
Enrique Perez Castro
POPalle Jörn Sloth Osther
Palle Jörn Sloth Osther
VJViorel Jinga
Viorel Jinga
HRHassan Razvi
Hassan Razvi
KSKonstantinos G Stravodimos
Konstantinos G Stravodimos
CGCROES Ureteroscopy Global Study Group
CROES Ureteroscopy Global Study Group

4 August 2016 in World Journal of Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BSBhaskar K Somani
Bhaskar K Somani
GGG. Giusti
G. Giusti
YSY. Sun
Y. Sun
POP. J. Osther
P. J. Osther
MFM. Frank
M. Frank
JRJean de la Rosette
Jean de la Rosette
Introduction Ureterorenoscopy (URS) is a popular and growing option for management of ureteric and renal stones. The CROES URS Global Study was set up to assess the outcomes of URS in a large worldwide cohort of patients involving multiple centres. In this paper, we analysed the database for intra-operative and post-operative complications associated with ureterorenoscopy. Methods The CROES database was established via collaboration between 114 centres in 32 countries worldwide, and information on both intra-operative and post-operative complications was collected electronically between January 2010 and October 2012. Result On analysis of a total of 11,885 patients, the overall complication and stone-free rates were found to be 7.4 and 85.6 %, respectively. The intra-operative and post-operative complication rates were 4.2 and 2.6 %, respectively, and in total 5 deaths were reported in the study period. Taking into account different world economies, there were no differences in the complication rates between the developing and developed nations or between different centres from different continents. Conclusion Ureterorenoscopy is a safe and effective procedure for treatment of stones, the outcomes of which are broadly comparable in different parts of the world for similar patient and stone demographics.

1 November 2008 in European Urology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JRJean de la Rosette
Jean de la Rosette
MLMaria P. Laguna
Maria P. Laguna
JRJens J. Rassweiler
Jens J. Rassweiler
PCPierre Conort
Pierre Conort