Juepeng Zheng

Dr. Juepeng Zheng

Tsinghua University
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
16 February 2019 in Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
WLWeijia Li
Weijia Li
CHConghui He
Conghui He
JFJiarui Fang
Jiarui Fang
Juepeng ZhengJuepeng Zheng
Juepeng Zheng
HFHaohuan Fu
Haohuan Fu
Le YuLe Yu
Le Yu
Automatic extraction of building footprints from high-resolution satellite imagery has become an important and challenging research issue receiving greater attention. Many recent studies have explored different deep learning-based semantic segmentation methods for improving the accuracy of building extraction. Although they record substantial land cover and land use information (e.g., buildings, roads, water, etc.), public geographic information system (GIS) map datasets have rarely been utilized to improve building extraction results in existing studies. In this research, we propose a U-Net-based semantic segmentation method for the extraction of building footprints from high-resolution multispectral satellite images using the SpaceNet building dataset provided in the DeepGlobe Satellite Challenge of IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition 2018 (CVPR 2018). We explore the potential of multiple public GIS map datasets (OpenStreetMap, Google Maps, and MapWorld) through integration with the WorldView-3 satellite datasets in four cities (Las Vegas, Paris, Shanghai, and Khartoum). Several strategies are designed and combined with the U-Net–based semantic segmentation model, including data augmentation, post-processing, and integration of the GIS map data and satellite images. The proposed method achieves a total F1-score of 0.704, which is an improvement of 1.1% to 12.5% compared with the top three solutions in the SpaceNet Building Detection Competition and 3.0% to 9.2% compared with the standard U-Net–based method. Moreover, the effect of each proposed strategy and the possible reasons for the building footprint extraction results are analyzed substantially considering the actual situation of the four cities.

1 March 2021 in ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Juepeng ZhengJuepeng Zheng
Juepeng Zheng
HFHaohuan Fu
Haohuan Fu
WLWeijia Li
Weijia Li
WWWenzhao Wu
Wenzhao Wu
LYLe Yu
Le Yu
KKKasturi Devi Kanniah
Kasturi Devi Kanniah

1 September 2020 in ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Juepeng ZhengJuepeng Zheng
Juepeng Zheng
HFHaohuan Fu
Haohuan Fu
WLWeijia Li
Weijia Li
WWWenzhao Wu
Wenzhao Wu
YZYi Zhao
Yi Zhao
Le YuLe Yu
Le Yu

12 November 2024 in IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Magazine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Juepeng ZhengJuepeng Zheng
Juepeng Zheng
SYShuai Yuan
Shuai Yuan
WLWeijia Li
Weijia Li
HFHaohuan Fu
Haohuan Fu
Le YuLe Yu
Le Yu
Jianxi HuangJianxi Huang
Jianxi Huang
Powered by advances of optical remote sensing sensors, the production of very high spatial resolution multispectral images provides great potential for achieving cost-efficient and high-accuracy forest inventory and analysis in an automated way. Lots of studies that aim at providing an inventory of the level of each individual tree have generated many methods for Individual Tree Crown Detection and Delineation (ITCD). This review covers ITCD methods for detecting and delineating individual tree crowns, and systematically reviews the past and present of ITCD-related researches applied to the optical remote sensing images. With the goal to provide a clear knowledge map of existing ITCD efforts, we conduct a comprehensive review of recent ITCD papers to build a meta-data analysis, including the algorithm, the study site, the tree species, the sensor type, the evaluation method, etc. We categorize the methods into three classes: (1) traditional image processing methods (such as local maximum filtering, image segmentation); (2) traditional machine learning methods (such as random forest, decision tree); and (3) deep learning-based methods. With deep learning-oriented approaches contributing to a majority, we further discuss deep learning-based methods like semantic segmentation and object detection methods. In addition, we discuss four ITCD-related issues to further comprehend the ITCD domain using optical remote sensing data, such as comparisons between multi-sensor-based data and optical data in the ITCD domain, comparisons among different algorithms and different ITCD tasks, etc. Finally, this review proposes some ITCD-related applications and a few exciting prospects and potential hot topics in future ITCD research.

24 May 2023 in ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
WLWeijia Li
Weijia Li
WZWenqian Zhao
Wenqian Zhao
JYJinhua Yu
Jinhua Yu
Juepeng ZhengJuepeng Zheng
Juepeng Zheng
CHConghui He
Conghui He
DLDahua Lin
Dahua Lin

24 August 2021 in IEEE Transactions on Geoscience and Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Juepeng ZhengJuepeng Zheng
Juepeng Zheng
WWWenzhao Wu
Wenzhao Wu
SYShuai Yuan
Shuai Yuan
YZYi Zhao
Yi Zhao
WLWeijia Li
Weijia Li
HFHaohuan Fu
Haohuan Fu
Over the past decade, domain adaptation (DA) algorithms have been proposed to address domain gap problems as they do not need any interpretation in the target domain. However, most existing efforts focus on scenarios with only one source domain and one target domain. In this article, we explore the scenario with one source domain and mixed multiple target domains for remote sensing applications and propose a new algorithm, named the two-stage adaptation network (TSAN). First, we utilize the adversarial learning approach to confuse the classifier to discriminate between the source domain and the whole mixed-multiple-target domain. Second, we adopt self-supervised learning to divide the mixed-multiple-target domain with automated generation of “pseudo”-domain labels, which guides our network to learn intrinsic features of multiple target domains. Finally, these two steps are combined as an iterative procedure. We integrate a test dataset that includes five remote sensing datasets and ten classes. Our method achieves an average accuracy of 63.25% and 73.68% with two typical backbones, considerably outperforming other DA methods with an average accuracy improvement of 4.84%–20.19% and 9.06%–17.04%, respectively. Furthermore, we identify the negative transfer effect in existing mainstream DA methods in remote sensing image classification with multiple different domains.