Behnam Keshavarz

Dr. Behnam Keshavarz

University of Virginia, Department of Medicine
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

17Years (2010-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2013 in Carbohydrate Polymers
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Mehran GhasemlouMehran Ghasemlou
Mehran Ghasemlou
NANahal Aliheidari
Nahal Aliheidari
RFRonak Fahmi
Ronak Fahmi
SSSaeedeh Shojaee-Aliabadi
Saeedeh Shojaee-Aliabadi
BKBehnam Keshavarz
Behnam Keshavarz
RKRamin Khaksar
Ramin Khaksar

1 January 2020 in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
TPThomas A. Platts-Mills
Thomas A. Platts-Mills
RLRung-Chi Li
Rung-Chi Li
BKBehnam Keshavarz
Behnam Keshavarz
ASAnna R. Smith
Anna R. Smith
JWJeffrey M. Wilson
Jeffrey M. Wilson

2 September 2021 in JAMA Network Open
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NRNathan E. Richards
Nathan E. Richards
BKBehnam Keshavarz
Behnam Keshavarz
LWLisa J. Workman
Lisa J. Workman
MNMichael R. Nelson
Michael R. Nelson
TPThomas A. E. Platts-Mills
Thomas A. E. Platts-Mills
JWJeffrey M. Wilson
Jeffrey M. Wilson
Two COVID-19 mRNA vaccines, BNT162b2 (ie, Pfizer/BioNTech) and mRNA-1273 (ie, Moderna), were approved via the US Food and Drug Administration Emergency Use Authorization (FDA-EUA) for adults in December 2020. Both incorporate mRNA that encodes for the prefusion stabilized spike glycoprotein, use a prime-boost strategy, and have shown strong immunogenicity in preclinical and clinical studies.1,2 Although the 2 vaccines share similar features and both showed strong efficacy in clinical trials, there are formulation differences, and there has been little head-to-head evaluation of antibody responses. In this cohort study, we used a quantitative assay for IgG to SARS-CoV-2 spike-receptor binding protein to compare antibody responses in an employee cohort in which both BNT162b2 and mRNA-1273 were administered. We hypothesized that there could be differences in antibody levels elicited by the 2 vaccines and explored the effect of age on immunogenicity.

2 March 2021 in Allergy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
TPThomas A. Platts-Mills
Thomas A. Platts-Mills
Christiane HilgerChristiane Hilger
Christiane Hilger
UJUta Jappe
Uta Jappe
MHMarianne van Hage
Marianne van Hage
GGGabriele Gadermaier
Gabriele Gadermaier
APAnna Pomes
Anna Pomes
Until recently, glycan epitopes have not been documented by the WHO/IUIS Allergen Nomenclature Sub‐Committee. This was in part due to scarce or incomplete information on these oligosaccharides, but also due to the widely held opinion that IgE to these epitopes had little or no relevance to allergic symptoms. Most IgE‐binding glycans recognized up to 2008 were considered to be “classical” cross‐reactive carbohydrate determinants (CCD) that occur in insects, some helminths and throughout the plant kingdom. Since 2008, the prevailing opinion on lack of clinical relevance of IgE‐binding glycans has been subject to a reevaluation. This was because IgE specific for the mammalian disaccharide galactose‐alpha‐1,3‐galactose (alpha‐gal) was identified as a cause of delayed anaphylaxis to mammalian meat in the United States, an observation that has been confirmed by allergists in many parts of the world. Several experimental studies have shown that oligosaccharides with one or more terminal alpha‐gal epitopes can be attached as a hapten to many different mammalian proteins or lipids. The classical CCDs also behave like haptens since they can be expressed on proteins from multiple species. This is the explanation for extensive in vitro cross‐reactivity related to CCDs. Because of these developments, the Allergen Nomenclature Sub‐Committee recently decided to include glycans as potentially allergenic epitopes in an adjunct section of its website (www.allergen.org). In this article, the features of the main glycan groups known to be involved in IgE recognition are revisited, and their characteristic structural, functional, and clinical features are discussed.

1 January 2020 in The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology: In Practice
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MKMargaret Shin Kim
Margaret Shin Kim
MSMatthew D. Straesser
Matthew D. Straesser
BKBehnam Keshavarz
Behnam Keshavarz
LWLisa Workman
Lisa Workman
EMEmily C. McGowan
Emily C. McGowan
JWJeffrey M. Wilson
Jeffrey M. Wilson

30 October 2010 in Journal of the American Oil Chemists' Society
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
AMAli Moayedi
Ali Moayedi
Karamatollah RezaeiKaramatollah Rezaei
Karamatollah Rezaei
SMSohrab Moini
Sohrab Moini
BKBehnam Keshavarz
Behnam Keshavarz