Benjamin Ondruschka

Dr. Benjamin Ondruschka


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
10 September 2018 in Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BOBenjamin Ondruschka
Benjamin Ondruschka
CBChristina Baier
Christina Baier
RBRonny Bayer
Ronny Bayer
NHNiels Hammer
Niels Hammer
JDJan Dreßler
Jan Dreßler
MBMichael Bernhard
Michael Bernhard

11 June 2021 in International journal of legal medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JZJohann Zwirner
Johann Zwirner
JLJulia Lier
Julia Lier
HFHeike Franke
Heike Franke
NHNiels Hammer
Niels Hammer
JMJakob Matschke
Jakob Matschke
BOBenjamin Ondruschka
Benjamin Ondruschka
Glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) is a well-established astrocytic biomarker for the diagnosis, monitoring and outcome prediction of traumatic brain injury (TBI). Few studies stated an accumulation of neuronal GFAP that was observed in various brain pathologies, including traumatic brain injuries. As the neuronal immunopositivity for GFAP in Alzheimer patients was shown to cross-react with non-GFAP epitopes, the neuronal immunopositivity for GFAP in TBI patients should be challenged. In this study, cerebral and cerebellar tissues of 52 TBI fatalities and 17 controls were screened for immunopositivity for GFAP in neurons by means of immunohistochemistry and immunofluorescence. The results revealed that neuronal immunopositivity for GFAP is most likely a staining artefact as negative controls also revealed neuronal GFAP staining. However, the phenomenon was twice as frequent for TBI fatalities compared to non-TBI control cases (12 vs. 6%). Neuronal GFAP staining was observed in the pericontusional zone and the ipsilateral hippocampus, but was absent in the contralateral cortex of TBI cases. Immunopositivity for GFAP was significantly correlated with the survival time (r = 0.306, P = 0.015), but no correlations were found with age at death, sex nor the post-mortem interval in TBI fatalities. This study provides evidence that the TBI-associated neuronal immunopositivity for GFAP is indeed a staining artefact. However, an absence post-traumatic neuronal GFAP cannot readily be assumed. Regardless of the particular mechanism, this study revealed that the artefact/potential neuronal immunopositivity for GFAP is a global, rather than a regional brain phenomenon and might be useful for minimum TBI survival time determinations, if certain exclusion criteria are strictly respected.

6 January 2018 in International journal of legal medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BOBenjamin Ondruschka
Benjamin Ondruschka
SSSandra Schuch
Sandra Schuch
DPDirk Pohlers
Dirk Pohlers
HFHeike Franke
Heike Franke
JDJan Dreßler
Jan Dreßler

15 August 2019 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FTFlorian Trautz
Florian Trautz
HFHeike Franke
Heike Franke
SBSimone Bohnert
Simone Bohnert
NHNiels Hammer
Niels Hammer
WMWolf Müller
Wolf Müller
BOBenjamin Ondruschka
Benjamin Ondruschka
Knowledge on trauma survival time prior to death following a lethal traumatic brain injury (TBI) may be essential for legal purposes. Immunohistochemistry studies might allow to narrow down this survival interval. The biomarkers interleukin-6 (IL-6) and glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) are well known in the clinical setting for their usability in TBI prediction. Here, both proteins were chosen in forensics to determine whether neuronal or glial expression in various brain regions may be associated with the cause of death and the survival time prior to death following TBI. IL-6 positive neurons, glial cells and GFAP positive astrocytes all concordantly increase with longer trauma survival time, with statistically significant changes being evident from three days post-TBI (p < 0.05) in the pericontusional zone, irrespective of its definite cortical localization. IL-6 staining in neurons increases significantly in the cerebellum after trauma, whereas increasing GFAP positivity is also detected in the cortex contralateral to the focal lesion. These systematic chronological changes in biomarkers of pericontusional neurons and glial cells allow for an estimation of trauma survival time. Higher numbers of IL-6 and GFAP-stained cells above threshold values in the pericontusional zone substantiate the existence of fatal traumatic changes in the brain with reasonable certainty.

28 February 2022 in International journal of legal medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JZJohann Zwirner
Johann Zwirner
RKRachel Kulakofsky
Rachel Kulakofsky
AFAntonia Fitzek
Antonia Fitzek
ASAnn Sophie Schröder
Ann Sophie Schröder
SBSimone Bohnert
Simone Bohnert
BOBenjamin Ondruschka
Benjamin Ondruschka
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of death and its accurate diagnosis is an important concern of daily forensic practice. However, it can be challenging to diagnose TBI in cases where macroscopic signs of the traumatic head impact are lacking and little is known about the circumstances of death. In recent years, several post-mortem studies investigated the possible use of biomarkers for providing objective evidence for TBIs as the cause of death or to estimate the survival time and time since death of the deceased. This work systematically reviewed the available scientific literature on TBI-related biomarkers to be used for forensic purposes. Post-mortem TBI-related biomarkers are an emerging and promising resource to provide objective evidence for cause of death determinations as well as survival time and potentially even time since death estimations. This literature review of forensically used TBI-biomarkers revealed that current markers have low specificity for TBIs and only provide limited information with regards to survival time estimations and time since death estimations. Overall, TBI fatality-related biomarkers are largely unexplored in compartments that are easily accessible during autopsies such as urine and vitreous humor. Future research on forensic biomarkers requires a strict distinction of TBI fatalities from control groups, sufficient sample sizes, combinations of currently established biomarkers, and novel approaches such as metabolomics and mi-RNAs.

15 November 2013 in Journal of Neurotrauma
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BOBenjamin Ondruschka
Benjamin Ondruschka
DPDirk Pohlers
Dirk Pohlers
GSGerald Sommer
Gerald Sommer
KSKristin Schober
Kristin Schober
DTDaniel Teupser
Daniel Teupser
JDJan Dressler
Jan Dressler
Postmortem analysis of relevant biomarkers might aid in characterizing causes of death and survival times in legal medicine. However, there are still no sufficiently established results of practical postmortem biochemical investigations in cases of traumatic brain injury (TBI). The two biomarkers—S100 protein subunit B (S100B) and neuronal specific enolase (NSE)—could be of special interest. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate changes in their postmortem levels for further determination of brain damage in TBI. In 17 cases of TBI (average age, 58 years) and in 23 controls with different causes of death (average age, 59 years), serum and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were analyzed with a chemiluminescence immunoassay for marker expression. An increase in serum S100B, as well as a subsequent decrease after survival times>4 days, were detected in TBI cases ( p 6,000 ng/mL and CSF S100B levels >10,000 ng/mL seem to indicate a TBI survival time of at least 15 min ( p <0.01). It is of particular interest that CSF S100B levels ( p <0.01) and serum S100B levels ( p <0.05) as well as CSF NSE values ( p <0.01) were significantly higher in TBI cases in comparison to the controls, especially when compared with fatal non-head injuries. In conclusion, the present findings emphasize that S100B and NSE are useful markers in postmortem biochemistry in cases of suspected TBI. Further, S100B may be helpful to estimate the survival time of fatal injuries in legal medicine.