Adam R Karpf

Dr. Adam R Karpf

University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

30Years (1997-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2008 in Cell
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KRKunal Rai
Kunal Rai
IHIan J. Huggins
Ian J. Huggins
SJSmitha R. James
Smitha R. James
Adam R KarpfAdam R Karpf
Adam R Karpf
DJDavid A. Jones
David A. Jones
BCBradley R. Cairns
Bradley R. Cairns

3 November 2006 in Genes & Development
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PEPierre-Olivier Estève
Pierre-Olivier Estève
HCHang Gyeong Chin
Hang Gyeong Chin
ASAndrea Smallwood
Andrea Smallwood
GFGeorge R. Feehery
George R. Feehery
OGOmkaram Gangisetty
Omkaram Gangisetty
SPSriharsa Pradhan
Sriharsa Pradhan
Chromatin methylation is necessary for stable repression of gene expression during mammalian development. During cell division, DNMT1 maintains the DNA methylation pattern of the newly synthesized daughter strand, while G9a methylates H3K9. Here, DNMT1 is shown to directly bind G9a both in vivo and in vitro and to colocalize in the nucleus during DNA replication. The complex of DNMT1 and G9a colocalizes with dimethylated H3K9 (H3K9me2) at replication foci. Similarly, another H3K9 histone methyltransferase, SUV39H1, colocalizes with DNMT1 on heterochromatic regions of the nucleoli exclusively before cell division. Both DNMT1 and G9a are loaded onto the chromatin simultaneously in a ternary complex with loading factor PCNA during chromatin replication. Small interfering RNA (siRNA) knockdown of DNMT1 impairs DNA methylation, G9a loading, and H3K9 methylation on chromatin and rDNA repeats, confirming DNMT1 as the primary loading factor. Additionally, the complex of DNMT1 and G9a led to enhanced DNA and histone methylation of in vitro assembled chromatin substrates. Thus, direct cooperation between DNMT1 and G9a provides a mechanism of coordinated DNA and H3K9 methylation during cell division.

1 May 2011 in Nature Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CKChristopher J Klein
Christopher J Klein
MBMaria-Victoria Botuyan
Maria-Victoria Botuyan
YWYanhong Wu
Yanhong Wu
CWChristopher J. Ward
Christopher J. Ward
GNGarth A Nicholson
Garth A Nicholson
PDPeter J Dyck
Peter J Dyck
Christopher Klein and colleagues report that DNMT1 is disrupted in hereditary sensory neuropathy with dementia and hearing loss. The mutations lead to reduced methyltransferase activity, leading to global hypomethylation and site-specific hypermethylation. DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1) is crucial for maintenance of methylation, gene regulation and chromatin stability1,2,3. DNA mismatch repair, cell cycle regulation in post-mitotic neurons4,5 and neurogenesis6 are influenced by DNA methylation. Here we show that mutations in DNMT1 cause both central and peripheral neurodegeneration in one form of hereditary sensory and autonomic neuropathy with dementia and hearing loss7,8. Exome sequencing led to the identification of DNMT1 mutation c.1484A>G (p.Tyr495Cys) in two American kindreds and one Japanese kindred and a triple nucleotide change, c.1470–1472TCC>ATA (p.Asp490Glu–Pro491Tyr), in one European kindred. All mutations are within the targeting-sequence domain of DNMT1. These mutations cause premature degradation of mutant proteins, reduced methyltransferase activity and impaired heterochromatin binding during the G2 cell cycle phase leading to global hypomethylation and site-specific hypermethylation. Our study shows that DNMT1 mutations cause the aberrant methylation implicated in complex pathogenesis. The discovered DNMT1 mutations provide a new framework for the study of neurodegenerative diseases.

13 July 2020 in Nature Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
CHCortney E. Heim
Cortney E. Heim
MBMegan E. Bosch
Megan E. Bosch
KYKelsey J. Yamada
Kelsey J. Yamada
AAAmy L. Aldrich
Amy L. Aldrich
SCSujata S. Chaudhari
Sujata S. Chaudhari
Tammy KielianTammy Kielian
Tammy Kielian

1 October 2005 in Cancer Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Adam R KarpfAdam R Karpf
Adam R Karpf
SMSei-Ichi Matsui
Sei-Ichi Matsui
DNA methyltransferase 1 (DNMT1)–deficient mice are tumor-prone, and this has been proposed to result from the induction of genomic instability. To address whether loss of DNMT1, or the related protein DNMT3b, results in genomic instability in human cancer cells, we used a near-diploid human colorectal cancer cell line, HCT116, in which one or both DNMT genes were disrupted by homologous recombination. Array-based comparative genomic hybridization analyses indicated that double, but not single, DNMT knock-out cells display two specific alterations in regional DNA copy number, suggesting that DNMT deficiency and genomic DNA hypomethylation are not associated with widespread genomic amplifications or deletions in human cancer cells. However, spectral karyotype analyses revealed that DNMT-deficient HCT116 cells are highly unstable with respect to large-scale chromosomal alterations; furthermore, this effect is characterized by a high degree of individual cell heterogeneity. The induction of chromosomal alterations in DNMT-deficient cells was evidenced both by aneuploidy and by large increases in the number of novel chromosomal translocations. Studies of double knock-out cells indicated that the generation of chromosomal alterations is spontaneous and persistent in vitro, meeting the formal definition of genomic instability. In summary, we show that DNMT deficiency in human cancer cells results in constitutive genomic instability manifested by chromosomal translocations.

21 February 2019 in Cancers
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CBCarter Barger
Carter Barger
CBConnor Branick
Connor Branick
LCLinda Chee
Linda Chee
Adam R KarpfAdam R Karpf
Adam R Karpf
FOXM1 is frequently overexpressed in cancer, but this has not been studied in a comprehensive manner. We utilized genotype-tissue expression (GTEx) normal and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) tumor data to define FOXM1 expression, including its isoforms, and to determine the genetic alterations that promote FOXM1 expression in cancer. Additionally, we used human fallopian tube epithelial (FTE) cells to dissect the role of Retinoblastoma (Rb)-E2F and Cyclin E1 in FOXM1 regulation, and a novel human embryonic kidney cell (HEK293T) CRISPR FOXM1 knockout model to define isoform-specific transcriptional programs. FOXM1 expression, at the mRNA and protein level, was significantly elevated in tumors with FOXM1 amplification, p53 inactivation, and Rb-E2F deregulation. FOXM1 expression was remarkably high in testicular germ cell tumors (TGCT), high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSC), and basal breast cancer (BBC). FOXM1 expression in cancer was associated with genomic instability, as measured using aneuploidy signatures. FTE models confirmed a role for Rb-E2F signaling in FOXM1 regulation and in particular identified Cyclin E1 as a novel inducer of FOXM1 expression. Among the three FOXM1 isoforms, FOXM1c showed the highest expression in normal and tumor tissues and cancer cell lines. The CRISPR knockout model demonstrated that FOXM1b and FOXM1c are transcriptionally active, while FOXM1a is not. Finally, we were unable to confirm the existence of a FOXM1 auto-regulatory loop. This study provides significant and novel information regarding the frequency, causes, and consequences of elevated FOXM1 expression in human cancer.