Yemi Kim

Dr. Yemi Kim

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

15Years (2012-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications

1 April 2016 in Journal of Endodontics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SKSung Hyun Kang
Sung Hyun Kang
BKBom Sahn Kim
Bom Sahn Kim
YKYemi Kim
Yemi Kim

3 February 2015 in International Endodontic Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SKS. Y. Kim
S. Y. Kim
BKB. S. Kim
B. S. Kim
YKYemi Kim
Yemi Kim

1 November 2015 in Journal of Endodontics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SKSung Hyun Kang
Sung Hyun Kang
BKBom Sahn Kim
Bom Sahn Kim
YKYemi Kim
Yemi Kim

11 February 2019 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YKYemi Kim
Yemi Kim
BKBan-Suk Kim
Ban-Suk Kim
YKYong-Min Kim
Yong-Min Kim
DLDONGHEE LEE
DONGHEE LEE
Sin-Young KimSin-Young Kim
Sin-Young Kim
The purpose of this study was to compare the penetration ability of calcium silicate root canal sealers and conventional resin-based sealer using confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM). A total of 60 recently extracted single-rooted human premolars were used in this study. The root canals were prepared to a size 40/0.06 taper with ProFile rotary instruments and irrigated with NaOCl and EDTA. After drying all canals, the specimens were randomly divided into three experimental groups (n = 20): Group 1, gutta-percha (GP)/AH Plus with continuous wave compaction; group 2, GP/BioRoot RCS with a single-cone technique; and group 3, GP/Endoseal MTA with a single-cone technique. All experimental samples were sectioned perpendicular to their long axis using a low-speed diamond wheel at the apical, middle, and coronal third levels. The penetration abilities of all samples were evaluated using CLSM. A Kruskal–Wallis analysis and a series of Mann–Whitney U post hoc tests were performed. A higher intensity level was found in the coronal area and a lower intensity level in the apical area in all the experimental groups. The AH Plus group showed higher sum fluorescence intensity in the apical and coronal thirds compared with the BioRoot RCS and Endoseal MTA groups, whereas the BioRoot RCS group showed a higher intensity level in the middle third, similar to the AH Plus group. The maximum sealer penetration depth was low in the apical area and high in the coronal area in the AH Plus and Endoseal MTA groups. In the BioRoot RCS group, maximum sealer penetration was observed in the middle third. In conclusion, there were significant differences in sealer penetration pattern and distance according to the root level and sealer type.

4 September 2020 in Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
YKYemi Kim
Yemi Kim
DLDONGHEE LEE
DONGHEE LEE
DSDani Song
Dani Song
HKHye-Min Kim
Hye-Min Kim
Sin-Young KimSin-Young Kim
Sin-Young Kim
In this study, we assessed the biocompatibility and bioactivity of various pulp capping materials—ProRoot MTA (Dentsply Tulsa Dental Specialties), Biodentine (Septodont), TheraCal LC (Bisco), and Dycal (Dentsply Caulk)—on human dental pulp stem cells (hDPSCs). Experimental disks (diameter, 7 mm; height, 4 mm) were stored in a humified incubator at 37 °C for 48 h. Then, the pulp capping materials were tested for cytotoxic effects by methyl-thiazoldiphenyl-tetrazolium and scratch wound healing assays, and for mineralization potential by Alizarin red S (ARS) staining assay and alkaline phosphatase enzyme (ALP) activity. Cell viability and cell migration did not significantly differ between ProRoot MTA, Biodentine, and control (p > 0.05). TheraCal LC exhibited slower cell migration on days 2–4 compared to control (p < 0.05), and Dycal showed no cell migration. ALP activity was highest with Biodentine on days 10 and 14, and was lowered with TheraCal LC and Dycal (p < 0.05). In the ARS assay, hDPSCs grown in ProRoot MTA and TheraCal LC eluates showed significantly increased mineralized nodule formation on day 21 compared to Biodentine, Dycal, and control (p < 0.05). These findings indicate that ProRoot MTA, Biodentine, and TheraCal LC exhibit better biocompatibility and bioactivity than Dycal.