Jeong Hoon Lee

Dr. Jeong Hoon Lee

Seoul National University of Medicine
+1
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 March 2019 in European Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JLJeong Hoon Lee
Jeong Hoon Lee
EHEun Ju Ha
Eun Ju Ha
JKJu Han Kim
Ju Han Kim

17 February 2020 in European Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JLJeong Hoon Lee
Jeong Hoon Lee
EHEun Ju Ha
Eun Ju Ha
DKDaYoung Kim
DaYoung Kim
YJYong Jun Jung
Yong Jun Jung
SHSubin Heo
Subin Heo
KLKyungmin Lee
Kyungmin Lee

1 October 2018 in Thyroid®
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JLJeong Hoon Lee
Jeong Hoon Lee
JBJung Hwan Baek
Jung Hwan Baek
JKJu Han Kim
Ju Han Kim
WSWoo Hyun Shim
Woo Hyun Shim
SCSae Rom Chung
Sae Rom Chung
JLJeong Hyun Lee
Jeong Hyun Lee
Background: The presence of metastatic lymph nodes is a prognostic indicator of the patient and is an important determinant of clinical decision making. However, this process requires experience and is labor-intensive because many lymph nodes are located in the neck. Therefore, the development of a computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system to identify and differentiate metastatic lymph nodes is may be useful. Methods: From January 2008 to December 2016, we retrieved clinical records for 804 consecutive patients with 812 lymph nodes. The statuses of all lymph nodes were confirmed by fine-needle aspiration. The datasets were split into training (263 benign and 286 metastatic lymph nodes), validation (30 benign and 33 metastatic lymph nodes), and test (100 benign and 100 metastatic lymph nodes). Using the VGG-Class Activation Map model, we developed a CAD system to localize and differentiate the metastatic lymph nodes. We then evaluated the diagnostic performance of this CAD system in our test set. Results: In the test set, the accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of our model for predicting lymph node malignancy were 83.0%, 79.5%, and 87.5%, respectively. The CAD system clearly detected the locations of the lymph nodes, which not only provided identifying data, but also demonstrated the basis of decisions. Conclusion: We developed a deep learning-based CAD system for the localization and differentiation of metastatic lymph nodes from thyroid cancer on ultrasound. This CAD system is highly sensitive and may be used as a screening tool; however, as it is relatively less specific, the screening results should be validated by experienced doctors.

1 January 2022 in Korean Journal of Radiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JLJeong Hoon Lee
Jeong Hoon Lee
KKKi Hwan Kim
Ki Hwan Kim
ELEun Hye Lee
Eun Hye Lee
JAJong Seok Ahn
Jong Seok Ahn
JRJung Kyu Ryu
Jung Kyu Ryu
HCHye Young Choi
Hye Young Choi
Lee JH, et al. Korean J Radiol. 2022 May;23(5):505-516. https://doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2021.0476

25 August 2023 in The Journal of Clinical Endocrinology & Metabolism
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
EHEun Ju Ha
Eun Ju Ha
JLJeong Hoon Lee
Jeong Hoon Lee
DLDa Hyun Lee
Da Hyun Lee
JMJayoung Moon
Jayoung Moon
HLHaein Lee
Haein Lee
JKJi-hoon Kim
Ji-hoon Kim
Purpose To develop and validate a deep-learning-based AI model (AI-Thyroid) for thyroid cancer diagnosis, and to explore how this improve diagnostic performance. Materials and Methods The system was trained using 19,711 images of 6,163 patients in a tertiary hospital. It was validated using 11,185 images of 4,820 patients in 24 hospitals (test set 1) and 4,490 images of 2,367 patients in ____ (test set 2). The clinical implications were determined by comparing the findings of six physicians with different levels of experience (group 1: four trainees, and group 2: two faculty radiologists) before and after AI-Thyroid assistance. Results The area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve of AI-Thyroid was 0.939. The AUROC, sensitivity, and specificity were 0.922, 87.0%, and 81.5% for test set 1 and 0.938, 89.9%, and 81.6% for test set 2. The AUROCs of AI-Thyroid did not differ significantly according to the prevalence of malignancies (> 15.0% vs. ≤ 15.0%, p = 0.226). In the simulated scenario, AI-Thyroid assistance changed the AUROC, sensitivity, and specificity from 0.854 to 0.945, from 84.2% to 92.7%, and from 72.9% to 86.6% (all p < 0.001) in group 1, and from 0.914 to 0.939 (p = 0.022), from 78.6% to 85.5% (p = 0.053) and from 91.9% to 92.5% (p = 0.683) in group 2. The interobserver agreement improved from moderate to substantial in both groups. Conclusion AI-Thyroid can improve diagnostic performance and interobserver agreement in thyroid cancer diagnosis, especially in less-experienced physicians.

8 April 2024 in The Journal of Pathology: Clinical Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JLJeong Hoon Lee
Jeong Hoon Lee
GSGa‐Young Song
Ga‐Young Song
JLJonghyun Lee
Jonghyun Lee
SKSae‐Ryung Kang
Sae‐Ryung Kang
KMKyoung Min Moon
Kyoung Min Moon
DYDeok-Hwan Yang
Deok-Hwan Yang
Diffuse large B‐cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogeneous and prevalent subtype of aggressive non‐Hodgkin lymphoma that poses diagnostic and prognostic challenges, particularly in predicting drug responsiveness. In this study, we used digital pathology and deep learning to predict responses to immunochemotherapy in patients with DLBCL. We retrospectively collected 251 slide images from 216 DLBCL patients treated with rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R‐CHOP), with their immunochemotherapy response labels. The digital pathology images were processed using contrastive learning for feature extraction. A multi‐modal prediction model was developed by integrating clinical data and pathology image features. Knowledge distillation was employed to mitigate overfitting on gigapixel histopathology images to create a model that predicts responses based solely on pathology images. Based on the importance derived from the attention mechanism of the model, we extracted histological features that were considered key textures associated with drug responsiveness. The multi‐modal prediction model achieved an impressive area under the ROC curve of 0.856, demonstrating significant associations with clinical variables such as Ann Arbor stage, International Prognostic Index, and bulky disease. Survival analyses indicated their effectiveness in predicting relapse‐free survival. External validation using TCGA datasets supported the model's ability to predict survival differences. Additionally, pathology‐based predictions show promise as independent prognostic indicators. Histopathological analysis identified centroblastic and immunoblastic features to be associated with treatment response, aligning with previous morphological classifications and highlighting the objectivity and reproducibility of artificial intelligence‐based diagnosis. This study introduces a novel approach that combines digital pathology and clinical data to predict the response to immunochemotherapy in patients with DLBCL. This model shows great promise as a diagnostic and prognostic tool for clinical management of DLBCL. Further research and genomic data integration hold the potential to enhance its impact on clinical practice, ultimately improving patient outcomes.