Co-delivery of cisplatin and paclitaxel by folic acid conjugated amphiphilic PEG-PLGA copolymer nanoparticles for the treatment of non-small lung cancer

Mice housed in an enriched environment display a tumor-resistant phenotype due to eustress stimulation. However, the mechanisms underlying enriched environment–induced protection against cancers remain largely unexplained. In this study, we observed a significant antitumor effect induced by enriched environment in murine pancreatic cancer and lung cancer models. This effect remained intact in T/B lymphocyte-deficient Rag1−/− mice, but was nearly eliminated in natural killer (NK) cell–deficient Beige mice or in antibody-mediated NK-cell–depleted mice, suggesting a predominant role of NK cells in enriched environment–induced tumor inhibition. Exposure to enriched environment enhanced NK-cell activity against tumors and promoted tumoral infiltration of NK cells. Enriched environment increased the expression levels of CCR5 and NKG2D (KLRK1) in NK cells; blocking their function effectively blunted the enriched environment–induced enhancement of tumoral infiltration and cytotoxic activity of NK cells. Moreover, blockade of β-adrenergic signaling or chemical sympathectomy abolished the effects of enriched environment on NK cells and attenuated the antitumor effect of enriched environment. Taken together, our results provide new insight into the mechanism by which eustress exerts a beneficial effect against cancer. Cancer Res; 77(7); 1611–22. ©2017 AACR.

Psycho-social stress has been suggested to influence the development of cancer, but it remains poorly defined with regard to pancreatic cancer, a lethal malignancy with few effective treatment modalities. In this study, we sought to investigate the impacts of enriched environment (EE) housing, a rodent model of “eustress”, on the growth of mouse pancreatic cancer, and to explore the potential underlying mechanisms through gene expression profiling. The EE mice showed significantly reduced tumor weights in both subcutaneous (53%) and orthotopic (41%) models, while each single component of EE (inanimate stimulation, social stimulation or physical exercise) was not profound enough to achieve comparative anti-tumor effects as EE. The integrative transcriptomic and proteomic analysis revealed that in response to EE, a total of 129 genes in the tumors showed differential expression at both the mRNA and protein levels. The differentially expressed genes were mostly localized to the mitochondria and enriched in the citrate cycle and oxidative phosphorylation pathways. Interestingly, nearly all of the mitochondria-related genes were down-regulated by EE. Our data have provided experimental evidence in favor of the application of positive stress or of benign environmental stimulation in pancreatic cancer therapy.

Introduction: Cranial radiotherapy (CRT) is the main treatment for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with brain metastasis (BM) and non-EGFR/ALK/ROS1-TKIs indication, and anlotinib can improve overall prognosis. However, the clinical effects of CRT combined with anlotinib for the treatment of NSCLC with BM remain unclear. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical effects of anlotinib + CRT versus CRT alone in NSCLC patients with BM and non-EGFR/ALK/ROS1-TKIs indication from September 2016 to June 2020. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of anlotinib + CRT versus CRT alone were analyzed. After evaluation of the clinical characteristics to generate a baseline, the independent prognostic factors for intracranial PFS (iPFS) and OS were subjected to univariate and multivariate analysis. Finally, subgroup analysis for iPFS and OS was performed to assess treatment effects using randomized stratification factors and stratified Cox proportional hazards models. Results: This study included data for 73 patients with BM at baseline. Of the 73 patients, 45 patients received CRT alone, and 28 patients received CRT + anlotinib. There was no significant difference in clinical features between the two groups (P > 0.05). Compared with the CRT group, the combined group had longer iPFS (median iPFS [miPFS]: 3.0 months vs 11.0 months, P = 0.048). However, there were no significant differences in OS, extracranial PFS, and systemic PFS. For clinical features, univariate and multivariate analysis showed that the plus anlotinib treatment was an independent advantage predictor of iPFS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.27– 0.95; P = 0.04), and age ≥ 57 years (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01– 1.08, P = 0.014) and KPS score ≤ 80 (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.01– 1.08, P = 0.014) were independent disadvantage predictors of OS (P < 0.05). In addition, although this difference was not statistically significant (p > 0.05), the patients with the anlotinib + local CRT (LCRT) treatment had the longest iPFS (miPFS: 27.0 months) and OS (median OS [mOS]: 36 months). The miPFS and mOS values for the LCRT group were 11 months and 18 months, respectively, with shorter values for whole-brain RT (WBRT) + anlotinib group, WBRT + LCRT + anlotinib group, WBRT, and WBRT + LCRT. Conclusion: Anlotinib can improve the intracranial lesion control and survival prognosis of NSCLC patients with CRT.