Yaseen M Arabi

Yaseen M Arabi

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

31Years (1996-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 March 2019 in Nature Reviews Disease Primers
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MMMichael A. Matthay
Michael A. Matthay
RZRachel L. Zemans
Rachel L. Zemans
GZGuy A. Zimmerman
Guy A. Zimmerman
YAYaseen M Arabi
Yaseen M Arabi
JBJeremy R. Beitler
Jeremy R. Beitler
CCCarolyn S. Calfee
Carolyn S. Calfee

21 April 2011 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
DCD. James Cooper
D. James Cooper
JRJeffrey V. Rosenfeld
Jeffrey V. Rosenfeld
LMLynnette Murray
Lynnette Murray
YAYaseen M Arabi
Yaseen M Arabi
ADAndrew R. Davies
Andrew R. Davies
RWRory Wolfe
Rory Wolfe
It is unclear whether decompressive craniectomy improves the functional outcome in patients with severe traumatic brain injury and refractory raised intracranial pressure.

13 February 2008 in JAMA
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MMMaureen O. Meade
Maureen O. Meade
DCDeborah J. Cook
Deborah J. Cook
GGGordon H. Guyatt
Gordon H. Guyatt
ASArthur S. Slutsky
Arthur S. Slutsky
YAYaseen M Arabi
Yaseen M Arabi
FIfor the Lung Open Ventilation Study Investigators
for the Lung Open Ventilation Study Investigators
Acute lung injury and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS, the most severe form of acute lung injury), are potentially devastating complications of critical illness.1 Arising in response to direct lung injury (eg, pneumonia) or intense systemic inflammation (eg, sepsis),2 the pathogenesis involves pulmonary edema, diffuse cellular destruction, alveolar collapse, and disordered repair. Mortality and health care costs are high,3 and long-term survivors experience serious morbidity.4

1 November 2009 in Chest
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AKAnand Kumar
Anand Kumar
PEPaul Ellis
Paul Ellis
YAYaseen M Arabi
Yaseen M Arabi
DRDan Roberts
Dan Roberts
BLBruce Light
Bruce Light
DCDan Chateau
Dan Chateau

1 March 2018 in New England Journal of Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BVBalasubramanian Venkatesh
Balasubramanian Venkatesh
SFSimon Finfer
Simon Finfer
JCJeremy Cohen
Jeremy Cohen
DRDorrilyn Rajbhandari
Dorrilyn Rajbhandari
YAYaseen M Arabi
Yaseen M Arabi
JMJohn Myburgh
John Myburgh
Whether hydrocortisone reduces mortality among patients with septic shock is unclear. We randomly assigned patients with septic shock who were undergoing mechanical ventilation to receive hydrocortisone (at a dose of 200 mg per day) or placebo for 7 days or until death or discharge from the intensive care unit (ICU), whichever came first. The primary outcome was death from any cause at 90 days. From March 2013 through April 2017, a total of 3800 patients underwent randomization. Status with respect to the primary outcome was ascertained in 3658 patients (1832 of whom had been assigned to the hydrocortisone group and 1826 to the placebo group). At 90 days, 511 patients (27.9%) in the hydrocortisone group and 526 (28.8%) in the placebo group had died (odds ratio, 0.95; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82 to 1.10; P=0.50). The effect of the trial regimen was similar in six prespecified subgroups. Patients who had been assigned to receive hydrocortisone had faster resolution of shock than those assigned to the placebo group (median duration, 3 days [interquartile range, 2 to 5] vs. 4 days [interquartile range, 2 to 9]; hazard ratio, 1.32; 95% CI, 1.23 to 1.41; P<0.001). Patients in the hydrocortisone group had a shorter duration of the initial episode of mechanical ventilation than those in the placebo group (median, 6 days [interquartile range, 3 to 18] vs. 7 days [interquartile range, 3 to 24]; hazard ratio, 1.13; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.22; P<0.001), but taking into account episodes of recurrence of ventilation, there were no significant differences in the number of days alive and free from mechanical ventilation. Fewer patients in the hydrocortisone group than in the placebo group received a blood transfusion (37.0% vs. 41.7%; odds ratio, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.72 to 0.94; P=0.004). There were no significant between-group differences with respect to mortality at 28 days, the rate of recurrence of shock, the number of days alive and out of the ICU, the number of days alive and out of the hospital, the recurrence of mechanical ventilation, the rate of renal-replacement therapy, and the incidence of new-onset bacteremia or fungemia. Among patients with septic shock undergoing mechanical ventilation, a continuous infusion of hydrocortisone did not result in lower 90-day mortality than placebo. (Funded by the National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia and others; ADRENAL ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01448109.)

1 January 2024 in American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
MMMichael A. Matthay
Michael A. Matthay
YAYaseen M Arabi
Yaseen M Arabi
AAAlejandro C. Arroliga
Alejandro C. Arroliga
GBGordon Bernard
Gordon Bernard
ABAndrew D. Bersten
Andrew D. Bersten
KWKatherine D. Wick
Katherine D. Wick
Background: Since publication of the 2012 Berlin definition of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), several developments have supported the need for an expansion of the definition, including the use of high-flow nasal oxygen, the expansion of the use of pulse oximetry in place of arterial blood gases, the use of ultrasound for chest imaging, and the need for applicability in resource-limited settings. Methods: A consensus conference of 32 critical care ARDS experts was convened, had six virtual meetings (June 2021 to March 2022), and subsequently obtained input from members of several critical care societies. The goal was to develop a definition that would 1) identify patients with the currently accepted conceptual framework for ARDS, 2) facilitate rapid ARDS diagnosis for clinical care and research, 3) be applicable in resource-limited settings, 4) be useful for testing specific therapies, and 5) be practical for communication to patients and caregivers. Results: The committee made four main recommendations: 1) include high-flow nasal oxygen with a minimum flow rate of ≥30 L/min; 2) use PaO2:Fi O2 ≤ 300 mm Hg or oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry SpO2:Fi O2 ≤ 315 (if oxygen saturation as measured by pulse oximetry is ≤97%) to identify hypoxemia; 3) retain bilateral opacities for imaging criteria but add ultrasound as an imaging modality, especially in resource-limited areas; and 4) in resource-limited settings, do not require positive end-expiratory pressure, oxygen flow rate, or specific respiratory support devices. Conclusions: We propose a new global definition of ARDS that builds on the Berlin definition. The recommendations also identify areas for future research, including the need for prospective assessments of the feasibility, reliability, and prognostic validity of the proposed global definition.