Minghui Yang

Dr. Minghui Yang

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

8Years (2019-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
14 October 2019 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MYMinghui Yang
Minghui Yang
PBPaulo Bento
Paulo Bento
Ahsan AkbarAhsan Akbar
Ahsan Akbar
This research is carried out in the backdrop of increasing product quality and environmental degradation scandals associated with Chinese Pharmaceuticals in recent years. We examined the data of 125 Chinese Pharmaceuticals between 2010–2016 to investigate the impact of overall corporate social responsibility (CSR) performance as well as the performance on five unique aspects of CSR such as shareholders, employees, customers and suppliers, environmental practices, and the society to gauge the impact of these individual dimensions on the firm’s financial performance. The Hexun rating system is used to gauge a firm’s CSR performance on various stakeholder dimensions as it is one of the widely accepted CSR measurement criteria in China. The firm performance is measured by Tobin’s Q, return on assets (ROA), return on equity (ROE), and earnings per share (EPS) ratios. The outcome of the panel-based regression models reveals that the overall CSR score has a positive and significant influence on a firm’s financial indicators. Moreover, although all the CSR dimensions relate positively to firm performance, the environmental aspect of CSR has the most profound impact on firm performance followed by customers and suppliers, and employees. However, the shareholders and social dimensions have a relatively lesser influence on firm performance. These results imply that Chinese Pharmaceuticals shall further optimize each aspect of CSR performance as it can not only create a favorable brand image for various stakeholders but also results in sustainable financial performance.

11 March 2020 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JWJiawen Wang
Jiawen Wang
MYMinghui Yang
Minghui Yang
PMPetra Maresova
Petra Maresova
This research is implemented in the backdrop of the increasing number of private universities established in China over the last decade, and a growing public concern of sustainable development. The private university has a different reputation and source of funding compared with the public one, leading to different perception and practices toward sustainable development. Yet, none of past studies have investigated into public and private universities in the Chinese context, making this study fill this gap through comparing students’ perception in Zhongkai University of Agriculture and Engineering (a public university) and Guangzhou College of South China University of Technology (a private university). By using the five-point Likert scale questionnaire, 393 students from the public university and 347 students from the private university participated in the survey. The results reveal that students have greatest concern with sustainability commitment and their university’s role for promoting sustainable development, and have least concern with sustainability curricula and research. Compared with students from the public university, students in the private one more often agree on the importance of sustainable development, and have a higher level of perception about commitment, knowledge, attitudes, and practices toward sustainability. The study findings assert that the higher level of perception from private university’s students is due to active campus sustainability engagement and positive stakeholder relationship managed by university management. The study implies that higher education needs to decentralize sustainable plans and decision-making to students, staff, and faculty, and public universities need to incorporate more sustainability-related context into curriculum and academic project.

13 July 2022 in Applied Economics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MYMinghui Yang
Minghui Yang
SCShaoming Chen
Shaoming Chen
JWJiawen Wang
Jiawen Wang
YWYan Wang
Yan Wang
The debate about whether corporate social responsibility (CSR) and analyst coverage facilitate financial transparency is still open among academics and practitioners to date. Drawing from the information asymmetry view, this paper aims to investigate the impact of CSR on stock price crash risk, and to examine the moderating effect of analyst coverage on the ‘CSR – crash risk’ nexus. Using a sample of 8037 firm-year observations from Chinese-listed firms between 2010 and 2018, we find that CSR is negatively associated with crash risk. Analyst coverage cannot catalyse the positive role of CSR in reducing financial opacity, and thereby weakens the negative association between CSR and stock price crash risk. This implies that analysts fail to sufficiently disseminate firm-specific information, which in turn aggravates the information gap between insiders and outside investors. Our results remain robust after considering potential endogeneity and alternative CSR measures. The current study advances the understanding of ‘CSR – crash risk’ relationship with the moderating effect of analyst coverage. We also provide important references for investors and policymakers to better understand abnormal stock price fluctuations.

27 April 2020 in Sustainability
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Minhas AkbarMinhas Akbar
Minhas Akbar
Ahsan AkbarAhsan Akbar
Ahsan Akbar
PMPetra Maresova
Petra Maresova
MYMinghui Yang
Minghui Yang
HAHafiz Arshad
Hafiz Arshad
Bankruptcy risk is a fundamental factor affecting the financial sustainability and smooth functioning of an enterprise. The corporate bankruptcy risk‒return association is well founded in the literature. However, there is a dearth of empirical research on how this association prevails at different stages of the corporate life cycle. The present study aims to investigate the bankruptcy‒risk relationship at different stages of corporate life cycle by employing Hierarchical Linear Mixed Model (HLMM) regression estimation on the data of listed non-financial Pakistani firms from 12 diverse industrial segments. We grouped the firms into introduction, growth, mature, shake-out, and decline stages of the life cycle using Dickinson’s model. Empirical results assert that corporate risk-taking at the introduction stage yields superior financial performance in the future, while risk at the growth stage positively contributes to a firm’s current performance. Moreover, because of risk-averse and non-diversified managerial behavior, bankruptcy risk at the mature stage is negatively associated with both current and future performance. Likewise, risk-taking at the decline stage has significant negative implications for firm performance as the managers of such firms undertake heavy investments in a turnaround attempt; however, owing to the risk-averse behavior, they may indulge in negative net present value (NPV) projects. The study findings imply that managers synchronize a firm’s risk exposure with the corresponding life cycle stage to avoid going bankrupt. Moreover, excessive risk-taking during the mature and decline stages can considerably harm the financial sustainability of an enterprise. Hence, investors should exercise a degree of caution when investing in highly indebted later-stage (mature and decline) firms. Overall, bankruptcy risk‒return resembles an inverted U-shaped relationship. Our results are robust and can apply to various econometric specifications.

11 November 2022 in Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MYMinghui Yang
Minghui Yang
YWYan Wang
Yan Wang
LBLu Bai
Lu Bai
PMPetra Maresova
Petra Maresova

1 September 2020 in Risk Management and Healthcare Policy
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MYMinghui Yang
Minghui Yang
PMPetra Maresova
Petra Maresova
Background and Purpose: In recent years, the frequent occurrence of occupational accidents, illness, and injuries has become a major issue in China. This study aims to investigate the relationship between the adoption of Occupational Health and Safety Management System (OHSMS) standards and financial performance, with a particular focus on the pharmaceutical firms in China. Methods: The study is based on a sample consisting of 125 pharmaceutical firms listed on the Shanghai and the Shenzhen stock exchanges in China for the period 2010– 2018. Each sample firm was evaluated by whether and when it is certified by an OHSMS standard depending on secondary data collected from an independent certification database. Panel-based regression models were employed to explore whether adoption of an OHSMS standard has had an impact on financial performance. Results: The regression results reveal that the adoption of an OHSMS standard positively affects contemporaneous financial performance measured by return on assets (ROA), return on equity (ROE), and earnings per share (EPS). Mixed results were found when financial performance indicators were extended by two years, suggesting that ROE will increase in the second year after a firm is certified with the standard, but EPS will decline in the third year. Conclusion: The study findings empirically show that adoption of an OHSMS standard contributes to better financial performance for pharmaceutical firms of China in the short term. However, executives of pharmaceutical firms need to be aware of the increased costs related to certification renewal and audit in the following periods and exercise their management discretion to achieve a win–win situation between OHSMS implementation and financial benefit.