The Akechukesai IV mafic–ultramafic complex, located in the western segment of the eastern Kunlun orogenic belt (EKOB), represents a newly-discovered complex, containing Ni ores at grades of up to 0.98% Ni. It is dominated by olivine pyroxenite, pyroxenite, and gabbro units. The gabbros are enriched in lithophile elements (e.g., Rb, U, and K) and light rare-earth elements (LREE), with negative anomalies in high field-strength elements, except Zr, Ta. Nb/Ta(∼5) and Zr/Hf (∼10) ratios lower than the primitive mantle and chondrites, respectively, indicate the influence of the mantle metasomatic process or fractionation of accessory mineral phases. Zircon U–Pb dating of the gabbro yielded an age of 423.9 ± 2.6 Ma, indicating that the complex formed contemporaneously with the Xiarihamu Ni deposit (423 ± 1 Ma). The gabbro has negative εHf(t) values (−11.3 to −1.2) with corresponding T_DM1 ages of 1535–1092 Ma. The vein-like and disseminated mineralization (i.e., pyrite and pyrrhotite) have δ³⁴S values of 13.1‰–13.4‰ and 5.0‰–8.5‰, respectively, suggesting that the magmas that formed the complex assimilated crustal sulfur. They yield ²⁰⁶Pb/²⁰⁴Pb, ²⁰⁷Pb/²⁰⁴Pb, and ²⁰⁸Pb/²⁰⁴Pb values of 17.323–18.472, 15.422–15.626, and 37.610–38.327, respectively, indicating Pb derived from multiple sources (i.e., mantle crustal sources). Geochemical and Hf–S–Pb isotopic characteristics suggest that the complex formed from a primitive magma derived by partial melting of a spinel- and garnet-bearing lherzolite mantle at variable degree of 5%–10%. This source region was geochemically enriched by previous interaction with slab-related fluids. Tectonic reconstruction suggests that the Akechukesai IV complex was generated in a post-collisional extensional environment.

Permian magmatic rocks are extensively distributed in the East Kunlun Orogenic Belt (EKOB), yet controversies persist regarding the petrogenesis of granitoid rocks and the tectonic evolution of the Buqingshan-A’nyemaqing Ocean (BAO), which is a part of the Paleo-Tethys. This study addresses these debates through petrological analyses, whole-rock geochemistry and zircon U-Pb-Lu-Hf isotopic investigations of newly identified granitoids in the EKOB. Monzogranite (MG) and quartz porphyry (QP) yield weighted mean ages of 254.7 ± 1.1 Ma and 254.3 ± 1.1 Ma, respectively. Geochemically, the MG shows metaluminous to weakly peraluminous low-K calc-alkaline I-type affinity, characterized by high SiO₂ and low K₂O, MgO and FeO^T contents, as well as marked enrichment in light rare earth elements (LREEs), but depletion in Eu, Ba, Sr, P and Ti anomalies. In contrast, the QP exhibits a peraluminous high-K calc-alkaline I-type affinity, displaying high SiO₂ but low Na₂O and P₂O₅ contents. It is enriched in LREEs and Rb but displays negative Nb, Sr, P and Ti anomalies. Zircon ε_Hf(t) values range from −1.6 to 2.6 for MG and −4.4 to 1.5 for QP. We suggest that both MG and QP were derived from the partial melting of juvenile mafic lower crust, and that MG underwent a high degree of fractional crystallization. A synthesis of multiscale geological evidence allows us to propose a five-stage tectonic evolution for the BAO in the EKOB: (1) oceanic basin initiation before ca. 345 Ma; (2) incipient northward subduction commencing at ca. 278 Ma; (3) slab rollback stage (263–240 Ma); (4) syn-collisional compression (240–230 Ma); (5) post-collisional extension (230–195 Ma).

Late Paleozoic to Early Mesozoic granitoids in the East Kunlun Orogenic Belt (EKOB) provide critical insights into the complex and debated relationship between Paleo–Tethyan magmatism and tectonics. This study presents integrated bulk-rock geochemical and zircon isotopic data for the Xingshugou monzogranite (MG) to address these controversies. LA-ICP-MS zircon U-Pb dating constrains the emplacement age of the MG to 247.1 ± 1.5 Ma. The MG exhibits a peraluminous and low Na₂O A₂-type granite affinity, characterized by high K₂O (4.69–6.80 wt.%) and Zr + Nb + Ce + Y (>350 ppm) concentrations, coupled with high Y/Nb (>1.2) and A/CNK ratios (1.54–2.46). It also displays low FeO^T, MnO, TiO₂, P₂O₅, and Mg^# values (26–49), alongside pronounced negative Eu anomalies (Eu/Eu* = 0.37–0.49) and moderately fractionated rare earth element (REE) patterns ((La/Yb)_N = 3.30–5.11). The MG exhibits enrichment in light rare earth elements (LREEs) and large ion lithophile elements (LILEs; such as Sr and Ba), and depletion in high field strength elements (HFSEs; such as Nb, Ta, and Ti), collectively indicating an arc magmatic affinity. Zircon saturation temperatures (T_Zr = 868–934 °C) and geochemical discriminators suggest that the MG was generated under high-temperature, low-pressure, relatively dry conditions. Combined with positive zircon ε_Hf(t) (1.8 to 4.7) values, it is suggested that the MG was derived from partial melting of juvenile crust. Synthesizing regional data, this study suggests that the Xingshugou MG was formed in an extensional tectonic setting triggered by slab rollback of the Paleo-Tethys Oceanic slab.