Leticia Lerner

Dr. Leticia Lerner

Institut Jacques Monod CNRS, Université Paris Cité, UMR 7592, Paris, France
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 January 2019 in Genes
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LLLeticia Lerner
Leticia Lerner
JSJulian Sale
Julian Sale
A cursory look at any textbook image of DNA replication might suggest that the complex machine that is the replisome runs smoothly along the chromosomal DNA. However, many DNA sequences can adopt non-B form secondary structures and these have the potential to impede progression of the replisome. A picture is emerging in which the maintenance of processive DNA replication requires the action of a significant number of additional proteins beyond the core replisome to resolve secondary structures in the DNA template. By ensuring that DNA synthesis remains closely coupled to DNA unwinding by the replicative helicase, these factors prevent impediments to the replisome from causing genetic and epigenetic instability. This review considers the circumstances in which DNA forms secondary structures, the potential responses of the eukaryotic replisome to these impediments in the light of recent advances in our understanding of its structure and operation and the mechanisms cells deploy to remove secondary structure from the DNA. To illustrate the principles involved, we focus on one of the best understood DNA secondary structures, G quadruplexes (G4s), and on the helicases that promote their resolution.

8 July 2022 in Nucleic Acids Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GGGuillaume Guilbaud
Guillaume Guilbaud
PMPierre Murat
Pierre Murat
HWHelen S Wilkes
Helen S Wilkes
LLLeticia Lerner
Leticia Lerner
JSJulian Sale
Julian Sale
TKTorsten Krude
Torsten Krude
Replication of the human genome initiates within broad zones of ∼150 kb. The extent to which firing of individual DNA replication origins within initiation zones is spatially stochastic or localised at defined sites remains a matter of debate. A thorough characterisation of the dynamic activation of origins within initiation zones is hampered by the lack of a high-resolution map of both their position and efficiency. To address this shortcoming, we describe a modification of initiation site sequencing (ini-seq), based on density substitution. Newly replicated DNA is rendered ‘heavy-light’ (HL) by incorporation of BrdUTP while unreplicated DNA remains ‘light-light’ (LL). Replicated HL-DNA is separated from unreplicated LL-DNA by equilibrium density gradient centrifugation, then both fractions are subjected to massive parallel sequencing. This allows precise mapping of 23,905 replication origins simultaneously with an assignment of a replication initiation efficiency score to each. We show that origin firing within early initiation zones is not randomly distributed. Rather, origins are arranged hierarchically with a set of very highly efficient origins marking zone boundaries. We propose that these origins explain much of the early firing activity arising within initiation zones, helping to unify the concept of replication initiation zones with the identification of discrete replication origin sites.

1 January 2013 in Mutation Research - Reviews in Mutation Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
CRClarissa Ribeiro Reily Rocha
Clarissa Ribeiro Reily Rocha
LLLeticia Lerner
Leticia Lerner
OOOswaldo Keith Okamoto
Oswaldo Keith Okamoto
MMMaria Carolina Marchetto
Maria Carolina Marchetto
CMCarlos FM Menck
Carlos FM Menck

3 December 2016 in Nucleic Acids Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
LLLeticia Lerner
Leticia Lerner
GFGuilherme Francisco
Guilherme Francisco
DSDaniela T. Soltys
Daniela T. Soltys
CRClarissa R.R. Rocha
Clarissa R.R. Rocha
AQAnnabel Quinet
Annabel Quinet
CMCarlos FM Menck
Carlos FM Menck
Genome lesions trigger biological responses that help cells manage damaged DNA, improving cell survival. Pol eta is a translesion synthesis (TLS) polymerase that bypasses lesions that block replicative polymerases, avoiding continued stalling of replication forks, which could lead to cell death. p53 also plays an important role in preventing cell death after ultraviolet (UV) light exposure. Intriguingly, we show that p53 does so by favoring translesion DNA synthesis by pol eta. In fact, the p53-dependent induction of pol eta in normal and DNA repair-deficient XP-C human cells after UV exposure has a protective effect on cell survival after challenging UV exposures, which was absent in p53- and Pol H-silenced cells. Viability increase was associated with improved elongation of nascent DNA, indicating the protective effect was due to more efficient lesion bypass by pol eta. This protection was observed in cells proficient or deficient in nucleotide excision repair, suggesting that, from a cell survival perspective, proper bypass of DNA damage can be as relevant as removal. These results indicate p53 controls the induction of pol eta in DNA damaged human cells, resulting in improved TLS and enhancing cell tolerance to DNA damage, which parallels SOS responses in bacteria.

5 March 2013 in Human Mutation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DSDaniela T. Soltys
Daniela T. Soltys
CRClarissa R. R. Rocha
Clarissa R. R. Rocha
LLLeticia Lerner
Leticia Lerner
TSTiago A. de Souza
Tiago A. de Souza
VMVeridiana Munford
Veridiana Munford
CMCarlos FM Menck
Carlos FM Menck
Nucleotide excision repair (NER) is the most flexible of all known DNA‐repair mechanisms, and XPG is a 3′‐endonuclease that participates in NER. Mutations in this gene (ERCC5) may result in the human syndrome xeroderma pigmentosum (XP) and, in some cases, in the complex phenotype of Cockayne syndrome (CS). Two Brazilian XP siblings, who were mildly affected, were investigated and classified into the XP‐G group. The cells from these patients were highly ultraviolet (UV) sensitive but not sensitive to photosensitized methylene blue, an agent that causes oxidative stress. This phenotype is in contrast to XP‐G/CS cells, which are highly sensitive to this oxidative agent. Sequencing revealed a compound heterozygous genotype with two novel missense mutations: c.83C>A (p.Ala28Asp) and c.2904G>C (p.Trp968Cys). The first mutation maps to the catalytic site of the XPG protein, whereas the second may compromise binding to DNA. Functional assays indicated that the mutated alleles were unable to perform the complete repair of UV‐irradiated plasmids; however, full correction was observed for oxidatively damaged plasmids. Therefore, the XP phenotype of these patients is caused by novel missense mutations that specifically affect DNA repair for UV‐ but not oxidative‐stress‐induced DNA damage, and implications for XP versus XP/CS phenotype are discussed.

1 December 2018 in Mutation Research - Genetic Toxicology and Environmental Mutagenesis
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
AQAnnabel Quinet
Annabel Quinet
LLLeticia Lerner
Leticia Lerner
DMDavi J. Martins
Davi J. Martins
CMCarlos FM Menck
Carlos FM Menck