Elena Zakharova

Dr. Elena Zakharova

IRSTEA, 3275, Route de Cézanne, 13182 Aix-en-Provence, France

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 October 2004 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
AKAlexei V. Kouraev
Alexei V. Kouraev
Elena ZakharovaElena Zakharova
Elena Zakharova
OSOlivier Samain
Olivier Samain
NMNelly M. Mognard
Nelly M. Mognard
ACAnny Cazenave
Anny Cazenave
The paper discusses an application of the TOPEX/Poseidon (T/P) altimetry data to estimate the discharge of one of the largest Arctic rivers—the Ob' river. We first discuss the methodology to select and retrieve the altimeter water levels during the various phases of the hydrological regime. Then we establish the relationships between the satellite-derived water levels and the in situ river discharge measurements at the Salekhard gauging station near the Ob' estuary. The comparison of in situ and satellite-derived estimations of the Ob' discharge at Salekhard shows that the T/P data can successfully be used for hydrological studies of this river. We address the problems affecting the accuracy of the discharge estimations from altimeter measurements, identify potential solutions and suggest how satellite altimetry data may benefit hydrological studies of Arctic rivers.

1 November 2019 in Chemical Geology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JGJérôme Gaillardet
Jérôme Gaillardet
DCDamien Calmels
Damien Calmels
GRGibran Romero-Mujalli
Gibran Romero-Mujalli
Elena ZakharovaElena Zakharova
Elena Zakharova
JHJens Hartmann
Jens Hartmann

1 December 2016 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
KGKévin Guerreiro
Kévin Guerreiro
SFSara Fleury
Sara Fleury
Elena ZakharovaElena Zakharova
Elena Zakharova
FRFrédérique Rémy
Frédérique Rémy
AKAlexei Kouraev
Alexei Kouraev

1 April 2020 in Journal of Hydrology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Elena ZakharovaElena Zakharova
Elena Zakharova
KNKarina Nielsen
Karina Nielsen
GKG. Kamenev
G. Kamenev
AKA. Kouraev
A. Kouraev

4 September 2017 in The Cryosphere
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KGKevin Guerreiro
Kevin Guerreiro
SFSara Fleury
Sara Fleury
Elena ZakharovaElena Zakharova
Elena Zakharova
AKAlexei Kouraev
Alexei Kouraev
FRFrédérique Rémy
Frédérique Rémy
PMPhilippe Maisongrande
Philippe Maisongrande
Over the past decade, sea-ice freeboard has been monitored with various satellite altimetric missions with the aim of producing long-term time series of ice thickness. While recent studies have demonstrated the capacity of the CryoSat-2 mission (2010–present) to provide accurate freeboard measurements, the current estimates obtained with the Envisat mission (2002–2012) still require some large improvements. In this study, we first estimate Envisat and CryoSat-2 radar freeboard by using the exact same processing algorithms. We then analyse the freeboard difference between the two estimates over the common winter periods (November 2010–April 2011 and November 2011–March 2012). The analysis of along-track data and gridded radar freeboard in conjunction with Envisat pulse-peakiness (PP) maps suggests that the discrepancy between the two sensors is related to the surface properties of sea-ice floes and to the use of a threshold retracker. Based on the relation between the Envisat pulse peakiness and the radar freeboard difference between Envisat and CryoSat-2, we produce a monthly CryoSat-2-like version of Envisat freeboard. The improved Envisat data set freeboard displays a similar spatial distribution to CryoSat-2 (RMSD = 1.5 cm) during the two ice growth seasons and for all months of the period of study. The comparison of the altimetric data sets with in situ ice draught measurements during the common flight period shows that the improved Envisat data set (RMSE = 12–28 cm) is as accurate as CryoSat-2 (RMSE = 15–21 cm) and much more accurate than the uncorrected Envisat data set (RMSE = 178–179 cm). The comparison of the improved Envisat radar freeboard data set is then extended to the rest of the Envisat mission to demonstrate the validity of PP correction from the calibration period. The good agreement between the improved Envisat data set and the in situ ice draught data set (RMSE = 13–32 cm) demonstrates the potential of the PP correction to produce accurate freeboard estimates over the entire Envisat mission lifetime.

24 January 2006 in Comptes Rendus. Géoscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
Elena ZakharovaElena Zakharova
Elena Zakharova
AKAlexei V. Kouraev
Alexei V. Kouraev
ACAnny Cazenave
Anny Cazenave
FSFrederique Seyler
Frederique Seyler
This paper presents an application of the TOPEX/Poseidon (T/P) satellite altimetry data to estimate river discharge at three sites along the Amazon River. We discuss the methodology to establish empirical relationships between satellite-derived water levels and daily estimations of river discharges based on rating curves and in situ level measurements at gauging stations. Three sites are chosen: Manacapuru (River Solimões), Jatuarana (nearby the confluence of the Solimões and Rio Negro rivers) and Óbidos (Amazon River). We then reconstruct the satellite-based river discharge over a 10-year time span (1992–2002). Comparison between satellite-derived and river discharge at the gauging stations shows that the T/P data can successfully be used for hydrological studies of large rivers, in providing in particular discharge estimates when in situ data are not available.