Dong-Seok Yim

Dong-Seok Yim

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

33Years (1994-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
29 March 2012 in British Journal of Cancer
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JYJ H Yi
J H Yi
JLJeeyun Lee
Jeeyun Lee
SPS H Park
S H Park
JPJ O Park
J O Park
DYDong-Seok Yim
Dong-Seok Yim
WKW K Kang
W K Kang
Docetaxel is widely used as a chemotherapeutic agent for gastric cancer treatment. A combined regimen with sunitinib demonstrated a synergistic antitumour effect in a preclinical model. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this combination in patients with unresectable or metastatic advanced gastric cancer following failure of treatment with a fluoropyrimidine and platinum combination. This open-label, phase II, randomised trial enrolled patients with unresectable or metastatic gastric cancer. Patients were assigned to either a docetaxel monotherapy arm (D only arm: 60 mg m−2, every 3 weeks) or a combination arm (DS arm: docetaxel+sunitinib 37.5 mg every day). The primary end point of the study was time to progression and the secondary end points were overall response rate, disease control rate, overall survival, and toxicity profile. A pharmacokinetic study was also performed. A total of 107 patients were entered into the study. The TTP was not significantly prolonged in the DS arm when compared with the D only arm (DS vs D only arm: 3.9 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.9–4.9) vs 2.6 months (95% CI 1.8–3.5) (P=0.206). The hazard ratio for TTP was 0.77 (95% CI 0.52–1.16). However, the objective response rate was significantly higher in the DS arm (41.1% vs 14.3%, P=0.002). Patients in the DS arm experienced stomatitis, diarrhoea, and hand–foot syndrome more frequently. The addition of sunitinib to docetaxel did not significantly prolong TTP, although it significantly increased response.

1 June 2001 in Pharmacogenetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DYDong-Seok Yim
Dong-Seok Yim
SPSue Kyung Park
Sue Kyung Park
KYKeun-Young Yoo
Keun-Young Yoo
KYKyung-Sik Yoon
Kyung-Sik Yoon
HCHwyoung Hwa Chung
Hwyoung Hwa Chung
DKDaehee Kang
Daehee Kang
A case-control study was performed to assess the potential influence of catechol O-methyl transferase (COMT) genotype on the risk of breast cancer in Korean women. One hundred and sixty-three histologically confirmed incident breast cancer cases and 163 age- and menopausal status-matched control individuals with no present or previous history of cancer were selected as study subjects. COMT genetic polymorphism was determined by gel electrophoresis after NlaIII enzyme digestion of amplified DNA. Odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals were estimated by unconditional logistic regression after adjustment for known or suspected risk factors of breast cancer. Women with at least one COMT lower enzyme activity associated allele (COMT-L) were at elevated risk for breast cancer (OR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.04-2.78) compared with those homozygous for high enzyme activity associated COMT-H alleles. Among women with low (> or = 23.1) body mass index the COMT-L allele containing genotypes posed a marginally significant increased risk of breast cancer compared to the COMT-HH genotype (OR = 1.8, 95% CI = 0.95-3.48). Women with at least one COMT-L allele who had experienced a full-term pregnancy when aged over 30 years or were nulliparous had 2.7-fold increased risk; however, this increase did not reach statistical significance (OR = 2.7, 95% CI = 0.64-11.35). Furthermore, never-drinking and never-smoking women with at least one COMT-L allele were at increased risk of breast cancer compared to those with COMT-HH genotype with ORs of 2.0 (95% CI = 1.23-3.38) and 1.7 (95% CI = 1.04-2.62), respectively. These results are consistent with studies showing that COMT genotype of lower enzyme activity might be related to increase in risk of breast cancer, and extend this finding to Korean women.

1 April 2001 in Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
KYKyung‐Sang Yu
Kyung‐Sang Yu
DYDong-Seok Yim
Dong-Seok Yim
Joo-Youn ChoJoo-Youn Cho
Joo-Youn Cho
SPSoon Seong Park
Soon Seong Park
JPJi Young Park
Ji Young Park
SSSang‐Goo Shin
Sang‐Goo Shin
Background Moclobemide, an antidepressant with selective monoamine oxidase‐A inhibitory action, is known to be metabolized by CYP2C19 and is also reported to be an inhibitor of CYP2C19, CYP2D6, and CYP1A2. To confirm the involvement of CYP2C19, we performed a pharmacokinetic interaction study. Methods The effect of omeprazole on the pharmacokinetics of moclobemide was studied in 16 healthy volunteers. The volunteer group comprised 8 extensive metabolizers and 8 poor metabolizers of CYP2C19, which was confirmed by genotyping. Subjects were randomly allocated into two sequence groups, and a single‐blind, placebo‐controlled, two‐period crossover study was performed. In study I, a placebo was orally administered for 7 days. On the eighth morning, 300 mg of moclobemide and 40 mg of placebo were coadministered with 200 mL of water, and a pharmacokinetic study was performed. During study II, 40 mg of omeprazole was given each morning instead of placebo, and pharmacokinetic studies were performed on the first and eighth day with 300 mg of moclobemide coadministration. Results The inhibition of moclobemide metabolism was significant in extensive metabolizers even after a single dose of omeprazole. After daily administration of omeprazole for 1 week, the pharmacokinetic parameters of moclobemide and its metabolites in extensive metabolizers changed to values similar to those in poor metabolizers. In poor metabolizers, no remarkable changes in the pharmacokinetic parameters were observed. Conclusion Our results show that CYP2C19 is an important enzyme in the elimination of moclobemide and that it is extensively inhibited by omeprazole in extensive metabolizers, but not in poor metabolizers. Clinical Pharmacology & Therapeutics (2001) 69, 266–273; doi: 10.1067/mcp.2001.114231

1 February 2008 in The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YWYaning Wang
Yaning Wang
ABA. Venkatesh Bhattaram
A. Venkatesh Bhattaram
PJPravin R. Jadhav
Pravin R. Jadhav
LLLawrence J. Lesko
Lawrence J. Lesko
RMRajanikanth Madabushi
Rajanikanth Madabushi
JGJogarao V. S. Gobburu
Jogarao V. S. Gobburu

7 March 2005 in The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DYDong-Seok Yim
Dong-Seok Yim
HZHonghui Zhou
Honghui Zhou
MBMary Buckwalter Ba
Mary Buckwalter Ba
INIvan Nestorov
Ivan Nestorov
CPCarl C. Peck
Carl C. Peck
HLHoward Lee
Howard Lee

1 November 2011 in International Journal of Infectious Diseases
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SKSi-Hyun Kim
Si-Hyun Kim
DYDong-Seok Yim
Dong-Seok Yim
SCSu-Mi Choi
Su-Mi Choi
JKJae-Cheol Kwon
Jae-Cheol Kwon
SHSeunghoon Han
Seunghoon Han
JYJin-Hong Yoo
Jin-Hong Yoo