Cisplatin (cis-diamminedichloroplatinum) is widely used for the treatment of solid malignancies; however, the development of chemoresistance hinders the success of this chemotherapeutic in the clinic. This study provides novel insights into the molecular and phenotypic changes in an isogenic oesophageal adenocarcinoma (OAC) model of acquired cisplatin resistance. Key differences that could be targeted to overcome cisplatin resistance are highlighted. We characterise the differences in treatment sensitivity, gene expression, inflammatory protein secretions, and metabolic rate in an isogenic cell culture model of acquired cisplatin resistance in OAC. Cisplatin-resistant cells (OE33 Cis R) were significantly more sensitive to other cytotoxic modalities, such as 2 Gy radiation (p = 0.0055) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (p = 0.0032) treatment than parental cisplatin-sensitive cells (OE33 Cis P). Gene expression profiling identified differences at the gene level between cisplatin-sensitive and cisplatin-resistant cells, uncovering 692 genes that were significantly altered between OE33 Cis R cells and OE33 Cis P cells. OAC is an inflammatory-driven cancer, and inflammatory secretome profiling identified 18 proteins secreted at significantly altered levels in OE33 Cis R cells compared to OE33 Cis P cells. IL-7 was the only cytokine to be secreted at a significantly higher levels from OE33 Cis R cells compared to OE33 Cis P cells. Additionally, we profiled the metabolic phenotype of OE33 Cis P and OE33 Cis R cells under normoxic and hypoxic conditions. The oxygen consumption rate, as a measure of oxidative phosphorylation, is significantly higher in OE33 Cis R cells under normoxic conditions. In contrast, under hypoxic conditions of 0.5% O₂, the oxygen consumption rate is significantly lower in OE33 Cis R cells than OE33 Cis P cells. This study provides novel insights into the molecular and phenotypic changes in an isogenic OAC model of acquired cisplatin resistance, and highlights therapeutic targets to overcome cisplatin resistance in OAC.

Androgen signaling drives prostate cancer progression and is a therapeutic target. Hypoxia/HIF1a signaling is associated with resistance to hormone therapy and a poor prognosis in patients treated with surgery or radiotherapy. It is not known whether the pathways operate in cooperation or independently. Using LNCaP cells with and without stable transfection of a HIF1a expression vector, we show that combined AR and HIF1a signaling promotes tumor growth in vitro and in vivo, and the capacity of HIF1a to promote tumor growth in the absence of endogenous androgen in vivo. Gene expression analysis identified 7 genes that were upregulated by both androgen and HIF1a. ChIP-Seq analysis showed that the AR and HIF/hypoxia signaling pathways function independently regulating the transcription of different genes with few shared targets. In clinical datasets elevated expression of 5 of the 7 genes was associated with a poor prognosis. Our findings suggest that simultaneous therapeutic inhibition of AR and HIF1a signaling pathways should be explored as a potential therapeutic strategy.