Anna Moszczynska

Dr. Anna Moszczynska

Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Eugene Applebaum College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48201, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

34Years (1993-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
21 April 2009 in Molecular Ecology Resources
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Anna MoszczynskaAnna Moszczynska
Anna Moszczynska
SLSean A. Locke
Sean A. Locke
JMJ. DANIEL McLAUGHLIN
J. DANIEL McLAUGHLIN
DMDavid J. Marcogliese
David J. Marcogliese
TCTeresa J. Crease
Teresa J. Crease

18 February 2010 in Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
BYBryan Yamamoto
Bryan Yamamoto
Anna MoszczynskaAnna Moszczynska
Anna Moszczynska
GGGary A. Gudelsky
Gary A. Gudelsky

22 March 2007 in The EMBO Journal
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
FLFrank Js Lee
Frank Js Lee
LPLin Pei
Lin Pei
Anna MoszczynskaAnna Moszczynska
Anna Moszczynska
BVBrian Vukusic
Brian Vukusic
PFPaul J Fletcher
Paul J Fletcher
FLFang Liu
Fang Liu
Altered synaptic dopamine levels have been implicated in several neurological/neuropsychiatric disorders, including drug addiction and schizophrenia. However, it is unclear what precipitates these changes in synaptic dopamine levels. One of the key presynaptic components involved in regulating dopaminergic tone is the dopamine transporter (DAT). Here, we report that the DAT is also regulated by the dopamine D2 receptor through a direct protein–protein interaction involving the DAT amino‐terminus and the third intracellular loop of the D2 receptor. This physical coupling facilitates the recruitment of intracellular DAT to the plasma membrane and leads to enhanced dopamine reuptake. Moreover, mice injected with peptides that disrupt D2–DAT interaction exhibit decreased synaptosomal dopamine uptake and significantly increased locomotor activity, reminiscent of DAT knockout mice. Our data highlight a novel mechanism through which neurotransmitter receptors can functionally modulate neurotransmitter transporters, an interaction that can affect the synaptic neurotransmitter levels in the brain.

4 February 2004 in Journal of Neuroscience
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
LPLin Pei
Lin Pei
FLFrank J. S. Lee
Frank J. S. Lee
Anna MoszczynskaAnna Moszczynska
Anna Moszczynska
BVBrian Vukusic
Brian Vukusic
FLFang Liu
Fang Liu
Functional interactions between dopamine D1-like receptors and NMDA subtype glutamate receptors have been implicated in the maintenance of normal brain activity and neurological dysfunction. Although modulation of NMDA receptor functions by D1 receptor activation has been the subject of extensive investigation, little is known as to how the activation of NMDA receptors alters D1 function. Here we report that NMDA receptors regulate D1 receptor function via a direct protein–protein interaction mediated by the carboxyl tail regions of both receptors. In both cotransfected cells and cultured hippocampal neurons the activation of NMDA receptors increases the number of D1 receptors on the plasma membrane surface and enhances D1 receptor-mediated cAMP accumulation via a SNARE-dependent mechanism. Furthermore, overexpression of mini-genes encoding either NR1 or D1 carboxyl tail fragments disrupts the D1–NR1 direct protein–protein interaction and abolishes NMDA-induced changes in both D1 cell surface expression and D1-mediated cAMP accumulation. Our results demonstrate that the D1–NR1 physical interaction enables NMDA receptors to increase plasma membrane insertion of D1 receptors and provides a novel mechanism by which the activation of NMDA receptors upregulates D1 receptor function. Understanding the molecular mechanisms by which D1 and NMDA receptors functionally interact may provide insight toward elucidating the molecular neurobiological mechanisms involved in many neuropsychiatric illnesses, such as schizophrenia.

1 February 2004 in Brain
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Anna MoszczynskaAnna Moszczynska
Anna Moszczynska
PFPaul Fitzmaurice
Paul Fitzmaurice
LALee Ang
Lee Ang
KKKathryn S. Kalasinsky
Kathryn S. Kalasinsky
GSGregory A. Schmunk
Gregory A. Schmunk
SKStephen J. Kish
Stephen J. Kish
For more than 50 years, methamphetamine has been a widely used stimulant drug taken to maintain wakefulness and performance and, in high doses, to cause intense euphoria. Animal studies show that methamphetamine can cause short‐term and even persistent depletion of brain levels of the neurotransmitter dopamine. However, the clinical features of Parkinson’s disease, a dopamine deficiency disorder of the brain, do not appear to be characteristic of human methamphetamine users. We compared dopamine levels in autopsied brain tissue of chronic methamphetamine users with those in patients with Parkinson’s disease and in a control group. Mean dopamine levels in the methamphetamine users were reduced more in the caudate (–61%) than in the putamen (–50%), a pattern opposite to that of Parkinson’s disease. Some methamphetamine users had severely decreased dopamine levels, within the parkinsonian range, in the caudate (up to 97% dopamine loss) but not in the putamen. As the putamen and caudate subserve aspects of motor and cognitive function, respectively, our data suggest that methamphetamine users are not parkinsonian because dopamine levels are not sufficiently decreased in the motor component of the striatum. However, the near‐total reduction in the caudate could explain reports of cognitive disturbances, sometimes disabling, in some drug users, and suggests that treatment with dopamine substitution medication (e.g. levodopa) during drug rehabilitation might be helpful.

1 September 2017 in The Journal of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
Anna MoszczynskaAnna Moszczynska
Anna Moszczynska
SCSean Patrick Callan
Sean Patrick Callan
Understanding the relationship between the molecular mechanisms underlying neurotoxicity of high-dose methamphetamine (METH) and related clinical manifestations is imperative for providing more effective treatments for human METH users. This article provides an overview of clinical manifestations of METH neurotoxicity to the central nervous system and neurobiology underlying the consequences of administration of neurotoxic METH doses, and discusses implications of METH neurotoxicity for treatment of human abusers of the drug.