Caitlin Lynch

Dr. Caitlin Lynch


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
23 January 2024 in Annual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CLCaitlin Lynch
Caitlin Lynch
SSSrilatha Sakamuru
Srilatha Sakamuru
MOMasato Ooka
Masato Ooka
RHRuili Huang
Ruili Huang
CKCarleen Klumpp-Thomas
Carleen Klumpp-Thomas
MXMenghang Xia
Menghang Xia
Traditionally, chemical toxicity is determined by in vivo animal studies, which are low throughput, expensive, and sometimes fail to predict compound toxicity in humans. Due to the increasing number of chemicals in use and the high rate of drug candidate failure due to toxicity, it is imperative to develop in vitro, high-throughput screening methods to determine toxicity. The Tox21 program, a unique research consortium of federal public health agencies, was established to address and identify toxicity concerns in a high-throughput, concentration-responsive manner using a battery of in vitro assays. In this article, we review the advancements in high-throughput robotic screening methodology and informatics processes to enable the generation of toxicological data, and their impact on the field; further, we discuss the future of assessing environmental toxicity utilizing efficient and scalable methods that better represent the corresponding biological and toxicodynamic processes in humans.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
MOMasato Ooka
Masato Ooka
CLCaitlin Lynch
Caitlin Lynch
MXMenghang Xia
Menghang Xia
In vitro methods which incorporate metabolic capability into the assays allow us to assess the activity of metabolites from their parent compounds. These methods can be applied into high-throughput screening (HTS) platforms, thereby increasing the speed to identify compounds that become active via the metabolism process. HTS was originally used in the pharmaceutical industry and now is also used in academic settings to evaluate biological activity and/or toxicity of chemicals. Although most chemicals are metabolized in our body, many HTS assays lack the capability to determine compound activity via metabolism. To overcome this problem, several in vitro metabolic methods have been applied to an HTS format. In this review, we describe in vitro metabolism methods and their application in HTS assays, as well as discuss the future perspectives of HTS with metabolic activity. Each in vitro metabolism method has advantages and disadvantages. For instance, the S9 mix has a full set of liver metabolic enzymes, but it displays high cytotoxicity in cell-based assays. In vitro metabolism requires liver fractions or the use of other metabolically capable systems, including primary hepatocytes or recombinant enzymes. Several newly developed in vitro metabolic methods, including HepaRG cells, three-dimensional (3D) cell models, and organ-on-a-chip technology, will also be discussed. These newly developed in vitro metabolism approaches offer significant progress in dissecting biological processes, developing drugs, and making toxicology studies quicker and more efficient.

27 February 2019 in Molecules
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CLCaitlin Lynch
Caitlin Lynch
JZJinghua Zhao
Jinghua Zhao
SSSrilatha Sakamuru
Srilatha Sakamuru
LZLi Zhang
Li Zhang
RHRuili Huang
Ruili Huang
MXMenghang Xia
Menghang Xia
The nuclear receptor, estrogen-related receptor alpha (ERRα; NR3B1), plays a pivotal role in energy homeostasis. Its expression fluctuates with the demands of energy production in various tissues. When paired with the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ coactivator 1α (PGC-1α), the PGC/ERR pathway regulates a host of genes that participate in metabolic signaling networks and in mitochondrial oxidative respiration. Unregulated overexpression of ERRα is found in many cancer cells, implicating a role in cancer progression and other metabolism-related diseases. Using high throughput screening assays, we screened the Tox21 10K compound library in stably transfected HEK293 cells containing either the ERRα-reporter or the reporter plus PGC-1α expression plasmid. We identified two groups of antagonists that were potent inhibitors of ERRα activity and/or the PGC/ERR pathway: nine antineoplastic agents and thirteen pesticides. Results were confirmed using gene expression studies. These findings suggest a novel mechanism of action on bioenergetics for five of the nine antineoplastic drugs. Nine of the thirteen pesticides, which have not been investigated previously for ERRα disrupting activity, were classified as such. In conclusion, we demonstrated that high-throughput screening assays can be used to reveal new biological properties of therapeutic and environmental chemicals, broadening our understanding of their modes of action.

22 June 2022 in JCI Insight
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
SSSydney Stern
Sydney Stern
DLDongdong Liang
Dongdong Liang
LLLinhao Li
Linhao Li
RKRitika Kurian
Ritika Kurian
CLCaitlin Lynch
Caitlin Lynch
HWHongbing Wang
Hongbing Wang
Cyclophosphamide (CPA) and doxorubicin (DOX) are key components of chemotherapy for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), although suboptimal outcomes are commonly associated with drug resistance and/or intolerable side effects. Through an approach combining high-throughput screening and chemical modification, we developed CN06 as a dual activator of the constitutive androstane receptor (CAR) and nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2). CN06 enhances CAR-induced bioactivation of CPA (a prodrug) by provoking hepatic expression of CYP2B6, while repressing DOX-induced cytotoxicity in cardiomyocytes in vitro via stimulating Nrf2-antioxidant signaling. Utilizing a multicellular coculture model incorporating human primary hepatocytes, TNBC cells, and cardiomyocytes, we show that CN06 increased CPA/DOX-mediated TNBC cell death via CAR-dependent CYP2B6 induction and subsequent conversion of CPA to its active metabolite 4-hydroxy-CPA, while protecting against DOX-induced cardiotoxicity by selectively activating Nrf2-antioxidant signaling in cardiomyocytes but not in TNBC cells. Furthermore, CN06 preserves the viability and function of human iPSC–derived cardiomyocytes by modulating antioxidant defenses, decreasing apoptosis, and enhancing the kinetics of contraction and relaxation. Collectively, our findings identify CAR and Nrf2 as potentially novel combined therapeutic targets whereby CN06 holds the potential to improve the efficacy/toxicity ratio of CPA/DOX-containing chemotherapy.

5 December 2022 in Current Protocols
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CLCaitlin Lynch
Caitlin Lynch
SSSrilatha Sakamuru
Srilatha Sakamuru
MXMenghang Xia
Menghang Xia
The pregnane X receptor (PXR) is a nuclear receptor found mainly in the liver and intestine, whose main function is to regulate the expression of drug‐metabolizing enzymes and transporters. Recently, it has been noted that PXR plays critical roles in energy homeostasis, immune response, and cancer. Therefore, identifying chemicals or compounds that can modulate PXR is of great interest, as these can result in downstream toxicity or, alternatively, may have therapeutic potential. Testing one compound at a time for PXR activity would be inefficient and take thousands of hours for large compound libraries. Here, we describe a high‐throughput screening method that encompasses plating and treating HepG2‐CYP3A4‐hPXR cells in a 1536‐well plate, as well as reading and interpreting assay (e.g., luciferase reporter gene activity) endpoints. These cells are stably transfected with a human PXR expression vector and CYP3A4‐promoter‐driven luciferase reporter vector, allowing the identification of compounds that activate PXR through cytochrome 450 3A4. We also describe how to analyze the data from each assay and explain follow‐up steps, namely pharmacological characterization and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) assays, which can be performed to confirm results from the original screen. These methods can be used to identify and confirm hPXR activators after completion of a compound screening. Published 2022. This article is a U.S. Government work and is in the public domain in the USA. Current Protocols published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.Basic Protocol 1: Establishment of a high‐throughput assay to identify hPXR activatorsBasic Protocol 2: Quantitative high‐throughput screening a compound library to classify hPXR activatorsBasic Protocol 3: Performing pharmacological characterization and qPCR assays to confirm hPXR activators

1 January 2021 in Tetrahedron
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
BDBenjamin Diethelm-Varela
Benjamin Diethelm-Varela
AKAnmol Kumar
Anmol Kumar
CLCaitlin Lynch
Caitlin Lynch
GIGregory H. Imler
Gregory H. Imler
JDJeffrey Deschamps
Jeffrey Deschamps
FXFengtian Xue
Fengtian Xue