Michael Porter

Michael Porter


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
25 August 2015 in Advanced Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SNSteven E. Naleway
Steven E. Naleway
MPMichael Porter
Michael Porter
JMJoanna McKittrick
Joanna McKittrick
MMMarc A. Meyers
Marc A. Meyers
Eight structural elements in biological materials are identified as the most common amongst a variety of animal taxa. These are proposed as a new paradigm in the field of biological materials science as they can serve as a toolbox for rationalizing the complex mechanical behavior of structural biological materials and for systematizing the development of bioinspired designs for structural applications. They are employed to improve the mechanical properties, namely strength, wear resistance, stiffness, flexibility, fracture toughness, and energy absorption of different biological materials for a variety of functions (e.g., body support, joint movement, impact protection, weight reduction). The structural elements identified are: fibrous, helical, gradient, layered, tubular, cellular, suture, and overlapping. For each of the structural design elements, critical design parameters are presented along with constitutive equations with a focus on mechanical properties. Additionally, example organisms from varying biological classes are presented for each case to display the wide variety of environments where each of these elements is present. Examples of current bioinspired materials are also introduced for each element.

1 October 2012 in Materials Science and Engineering: A
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MPMichael Porter
Michael Porter
MYMichael Yeh
Michael Yeh
JSJames Strawson
James Strawson
TGThomas Goehring
Thomas Goehring
SLSamuel Lujan
Samuel Lujan
JMJoanna McKittrick
Joanna McKittrick

4 December 2013 in Advanced Functional Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MPMichael Porter
Michael Porter
RIRuss Imperio
Russ Imperio
MWMatthew Wen
Matthew Wen
MMMarc A. Meyers
Marc A. Meyers
JMJoanna McKittrick
Joanna McKittrick

1 February 2016 in Materials Science and Engineering: C
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SNSteven Naleway
Steven Naleway
JTJennifer R.A. Taylor
Jennifer R.A. Taylor
MPMichael Porter
Michael Porter
MMMarc A. Meyers
Marc A. Meyers
JMJoanna McKittrick
Joanna McKittrick

3 July 2015 in Science
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MPMichael Porter
Michael Porter
DADominique Adriaens
Dominique Adriaens
RHRoss L. Hatton
Ross L. Hatton
MMMarc A. Meyers
Marc A. Meyers
JMJoanna McKittrick
Joanna McKittrick
The curious tale of the square tail: Appendages in animals are typically round, but the seahorse tail has a square cross section. Porter et al. hypothesize that this shape provides better functionality and strength than a round cross section (see the Perspective by Ashley-Ross). Three-dimensional printed models show that square cross section shapes behave more advantageously when subjected to compressive forces. By allowing greater deformation without damage and accommodating twisting deformations, square appendages passively return to their original configurations. The added flexibility of the square cross section enhances the tail's ability to grasp objects. Science , this issue 10.1126/science.aaa6683 ; see also p. 30

1 September 2017 in Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MPMichael Porter
Michael Porter
NRNakul Ravikumar
Nakul Ravikumar
FBFrancois Barthelat
Francois Barthelat
RMRoberto Martini
Roberto Martini