Vassiliki Iconomidou

Prof. Vassiliki Iconomidou

National and Kapodistrian University of Athens
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

20Years (2007-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KGKosmas Galanis
Kosmas Galanis
KNKaterina Nastou
Katerina Nastou
NPNikos Papandreou
Nikos Papandreou
GPGeorgios N. Petichakis
Georgios N. Petichakis
DPDiomidis G. Pigis
Diomidis G. Pigis
Vassiliki IconomidouVassiliki Iconomidou
Vassiliki Iconomidou
Linear B-cell epitope prediction research has received a steadily growing interest ever since the first method was developed in 1981. B-cell epitope identification with the help of an accurate prediction method can lead to an overall faster and cheaper vaccine design process, a crucial necessity in the COVID-19 era. Consequently, several B-cell epitope prediction methods have been developed over the past few decades, but without significant success. In this study, we review the current performance and methodology of some of the most widely used linear B-cell epitope predictors which are available via a command-line interface, namely, BcePred, BepiPred, ABCpred, COBEpro, SVMTriP, LBtope, and LBEEP. Additionally, we attempted to remedy performance issues of the individual methods by developing a consensus classifier, which combines the separate predictions of these methods into a single output, accelerating the epitope-based vaccine design. While the method comparison was performed with some necessary caveats and individual methods might perform much better for specialized datasets, we hope that this update in performance can aid researchers towards the choice of a predictor, for the development of biomedical applications such as designed vaccines, diagnostic kits, immunotherapeutics, immunodiagnostic tests, antibody production, and disease diagnosis and therapy.

9 July 2009 in BMC Structural Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KFKimon K Frousios
Kimon K Frousios
Vassiliki IconomidouVassiliki Iconomidou
Vassiliki Iconomidou
CKCarolina-Maria Karletidi
Carolina-Maria Karletidi
SHStavros J Hamodrakas
Stavros J Hamodrakas
Background: Amyloidoses are a group of usually fatal diseases, probably caused by protein misfolding and subsequent aggregation into amyloid fibrillar deposits. The mechanisms involved in amyloid fibril formation are largely unknown and are the subject of current, intensive research. In an attempt to identify possible amyloidogenic regions in proteins for further experimental investigation, we have developed and present here a publicly available online tool that utilizes five different and independently published methods, to form a consensus prediction of amyloidogenic regions in proteins, using only protein primary structure data. Results: It appears that the consensus prediction tool is slightly more objective than individual prediction methods alone and suggests several previously not identified amino acid stretches as potential amyloidogenic determinants, which (although several of them may be overpredictions) require further experimental studies. The tool is available at: http://biophysics.biol.uoa.gr/AMYLPRED. Utilizing molecular graphics programs, like O and PyMOL, as well as the algorithm DSSP, it was found that nearly all experimentally verified amyloidogenic determinants (short peptide stretches favouring aggregation and subsequent amyloid formation), and several predicted, with the aid of the tool AMYLPRED, but not experimentally verified amyloidogenic determinants, are located on the surface of the relevant amyloidogenic proteins. This finding may be important in efforts directed towards inhibiting amyloid fibril formation. Conclusion: The most significant result of this work is the observation that virtually all, to date, experimentally determined amyloidogenic determinants and the majority of predicted, but not yet experimentally verified short amyloidogenic stretches, lie 'exposed' on the surface of the relevant amyloidogenic proteins, and also several of them have the ability to act as conformational 'switches'. Experiments, focused on these fragments, should be performed to test this idea.

Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AGAikaterini F. Giannopoulou
Aikaterini F. Giannopoulou
Athanassios VelentzasAthanassios Velentzas
Athanassios Velentzas
EKEvmorfia (Eumorphia) Konstantakou
Evmorfia (Eumorphia) Konstantakou
Margaritis AvgerisMargaritis Avgeris
Margaritis Avgeris
SKStamatia A. Katarachia
Stamatia A. Katarachia
Dimitrios StravopodisDimitrios Stravopodis
Dimitrios Stravopodis
Urinary bladder cancer is a common malignancy, being characterized by substantial patient mortality and management cost. Its high somatic-mutation frequency and molecular heterogeneity usually renders tumors refractory to the applied regimens. Hitherto, methotrexate-vinblastine-adriamycin-cisplatin and gemcitabine-cisplatin represent the backbone of systemic chemotherapy. However, despite the initial chemosensitivity, the majority of treated patients will eventually develop chemoresistance, which severely reduces their survival expectancy. Since chromatin regulation genes are more frequently mutated in muscle-invasive bladder cancer, as compared to other epithelial tumors, targeted therapies against chromatin aberrations in chemoresistant clones may prove beneficial for the disease. “Acetyl-chromatin” homeostasis is regulated by the opposing functions of histone acetyltransferases (HATs) and histone deacetylases (HDACs). The HDAC/SIRT (super-)family contains 18 members, which are divided in five classes, with each family member being differentially expressed in normal urinary bladder tissues. Since a strong association between irregular HDAC expression/activity and tumorigenesis has been previously demonstrated, we herein attempt to review the accumulated published evidences that implicate HDACs/SIRTs as critical regulators in urothelial bladder cancer. Moreover, the most extensively investigated HDAC inhibitors (HDACis) are also analyzed, and the respective clinical trials are also described. Interestingly, it seems that HDACis should be preferably used in drug-combination therapeutic schemes, including radiation.

1 March 2017 in PLOS ONE
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
KBKonstantina V. Biza
Konstantina V. Biza
KNKaterina Nastou
Katerina Nastou
PTParaskevi Tsiolaki
Paraskevi Tsiolaki
CMChara V. Mastrokalou
Chara V. Mastrokalou
SHStavros J. Hamodrakas
Stavros J. Hamodrakas
Vassiliki IconomidouVassiliki Iconomidou
Vassiliki Iconomidou
Protein-protein interactions are the quintessence of physiological activities, but also participate in pathological conditions. Amyloid formation, an abnormal protein-protein interaction process, is a widespread phenomenon in divergent proteins and peptides, resulting in a variety of aggregation disorders. The complexity of the mechanisms underlying amyloid formation/amyloidogenicity is a matter of great scientific interest, since their revelation will provide important insight on principles governing protein misfolding, self-assembly and aggregation. The implication of more than one protein in the progression of different aggregation disorders, together with the cited synergistic occurrence between amyloidogenic proteins, highlights the necessity for a more universal approach, during the study of these proteins. In an attempt to address this pivotal need we constructed and analyzed the human amyloid interactome, a protein-protein interaction network of amyloidogenic proteins and their experimentally verified interactors. This network assembled known interconnections between well-characterized amyloidogenic proteins and proteins related to amyloid fibril formation. The consecutive extended computational analysis revealed significant topological characteristics and unraveled the functional roles of all constituent elements. This study introduces a detailed protein map of amyloidogenicity that will aid immensely towards separate intervention strategies, specifically targeting sub-networks of significant nodes, in an attempt to design possible novel therapeutics for aggregation disorders.

6 July 2022 in Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Vasileios L. ZogopoulosVasileios L. Zogopoulos
Vasileios L. Zogopoulos
Georgia SaxamiGeorgia Saxami
Georgia Saxami
AMApostolos Malatras
Apostolos Malatras
KPKonstantinos Papadopoulos
Konstantinos Papadopoulos
ITIoanna Tsotra
Ioanna Tsotra
Ioannis MichalopoulosIoannis Michalopoulos
Ioannis Michalopoulos
Gene coexpression analysis constitutes a widely used practice for gene partner identification and gene function prediction, consisting of many intricate procedures. The analysis begins with the collection of primary transcriptomic data and their preprocessing, continues with the calculation of the similarity between genes based on their expression values in the selected sample dataset and results in the construction and visualisation of a gene coexpression network (GCN) and its evaluation using biological term enrichment analysis. As gene coexpression analysis has been studied extensively, we present most parts of the methodology in a clear manner and the reasoning behind the selection of some of the techniques. In this review, we offer a comprehensive and comprehensible account of the steps required for performing a complete gene coexpression analysis in eukaryotic organisms. We comment on the use of RNA-Seq vs. microarrays, as well as the best practices for GCN construction. Furthermore, we recount the most popular webtools and standalone applications performing gene coexpression analysis, with details on their methods, features and outputs.

16 February 2016 in FEBS Letters
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
NLNikolaos Louros
Nikolaos Louros
Evangelia ChrysinaEvangelia Chrysina
Evangelia Chrysina
GBGeorgios E. Baltatzis
Georgios E. Baltatzis
EPEfstratios S. Patsouris
Efstratios S. Patsouris
SHStavros J. Hamodrakas
Stavros J. Hamodrakas
Vassiliki IconomidouVassiliki Iconomidou
Vassiliki Iconomidou
Human zona pellucida (ZP) is composed of four glycoproteins, namely ZP1, ZP2, ZP3 and ZP4. ZP proteins form heterodimers, which are incorporated into filaments through a common bipartite polymerizing component, designated as the ZP domain. The latter is composed of two individually folded subdomains, named ZP‐N and ZP‐C. Here, we have synthesized six ‘aggregation‐prone’ peptides, corresponding to a common interface of human ZP2, ZP3 and ZP4. Experimental results utilizing electron microscopy, X‐ray diffraction, ATR FT‐IR spectroscopy and polarizing microscopy indicate that these peptides self‐assemble forming fibrils with distinct amyloid‐like features. Finally, by performing detailed modeling and docking, we attempt to shed some light in the self‐assembly mechanism of human ZP proteins.