Very old (aged ≥80 years) adults constitute an increasing proportion of the global population. Currently, this subgroup of patients represents an important percentage of patients admitted to the intensive care unit. Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) frequently affects very old adults. However, there are no specific recommendations for the management of critically ill very old CAP patients. Multiple morbidities, polypharmacy, immunosenescence and frailty contribute to an increased risk of pneumonia in this population. CAP in critically ill very old patients is associated with higher short- and long-term mortality; however, because of its uncommon presentation, diagnosis can be very difficult. Management of critically ill very old CAP patients should be guided by their baseline characteristics, clinical presentation and risk factors for multidrug-resistant pathogens. Hospitalisation in intermediate care may be a good option for critical ill very old CAP patients who do not require invasive procedures and for whom intensive care is questionable in terms of benefit.

Introduction: Nosocomial pneumonia develops after ≥48 h of hospitalisation and is classified as ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP); the latter may require mechanical ventilation (V-HAP) or not (NV-HAP).Main findings: VAP and HAP affect a significant proportion of hospitalised patients and are characterised by poor clinical outcomes. Among them, V-HAP has the greatest 28-day mortality rate followed by VAP and NV-HAP (27.8%versus18%versus14.5%, respectively). However, no differences in terms of pathophysiology, underlying microbiological pathways and subsequent therapy have been identified. International guidelines suggest specific flow charts to help clinicians in the therapeutic management of such diseases; however, there are no specific recommendations beyond VAP and HAP classification. HAP subtypes are scarcely considered as different entities and the lack of data from the clinical scenario limits any final conclusion. Hopefully, recent understanding of the pathophysiology of such diseases, as well as the discovery of new therapies, will improve the outcome associated with such pulmonary infections.Conclusion: Nosocomial pneumonia is a multifaced disease with features of pivotal interest in critical care medicine. Due to the worrisome data on mortality of patients with nosocomial pneumonia, further prospective studies focused on this topic are urgently needed.

Worldwide, there is growing concern about the burden of pneumonia. Severe community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) is frequently complicated by pulmonary and extra-pulmonary complications, including sepsis, septic shock, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and acute cardiac events, resulting in significantly increased intensive care admission rates and mortality rates. Streptococcus pneumoniae (Pneumococcus) remains the most common causative pathogen in CAP. However, several bacteria and respiratory viruses are responsible, and approximately 6% of cases are due to the so-called PES (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, extended-spectrum β-lactamase Enterobacteriaceae, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) pathogens. Of these, P. aeruginosa and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus are the most frequently reported and require different antibiotic therapy to that for typical CAP. It is therefore important to recognize the risk factors for these pathogens to improve the outcomes in patients with CAP.

Rationale: In 2017, the International European Respiratory Society/European Society of Intensive Care Medicine/European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases/Latin American Thoracic Society (European) guidelines defined new risk factors for multidrug-resistant (MDR) pathogens in patients with nosocomial pneumonia. Objectives: To assess the predictive performance of these newly defined risk factors for MDR pathogens. Methods: We enrolled 507 adult patients with nosocomial pneumonia who were treated in six intensive care units at the Hospital Clinic of Barcelona in Spain. Of the 503 patients at high MDR pathogen and mortality risk, 275 (54%) had no septic shock and 228 (46%) had septic shock. Results: Admission to hospital settings with high rates of MDR pathogens (n = 421; 83%) and prior antibiotic use (n = 399; 79%) showed the highest prevalence in the overall population, with sensitivities of 92% and 85% and negative predictive values of 85% and 82%, respectively. However, low specificities and low positive predictive values were found. Previous respiratory MDR pathogen isolation was less common (n = 17; 3%) but presented a specificity and positive predictive value of 100%. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was less than 0.6 for all risk factors and combinations. Conclusions: The risk factors proposed by the European Respiratory Society/European Society of Intensive Care Medicine/European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases/Latin American Thoracic Society showed low accuracy for predicting MDR pathogens in intensive care unit acquired pneumonia (ICU-AP). Admission to hospital settings with high rates of MDR pathogens and prior antibiotic use were the most prevalent risk factors, with a high sensitivity for predicting these microorganisms; prior positive cultures for MDR pathogens showed high specificity but very low sensitivity. Combinations of risk factors did not show any great accuracy for predicting these microorganisms. Further studies assessing combined strategies of risk stratification and complementary methods are now warranted.

Background: Ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) is a leading infectious cause of morbidity in critically ill patients, yet current guidelines offer no indications for follow-up cultures. We aimed to evaluate the role of follow-up cultures and microbiological response 3 days after diagnosing VAP as predictors of short- and long-term outcomes.Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of a cohort prospectively collected from 2004 to 2017. VAP was diagnosed based on clinical, radiographical and microbiological criteria. For microbiological identification, a tracheobronchial aspirate was performed at diagnosis and repeated after 72 h. We defined three groups when comparing the two tracheobronchial aspirate results: persistence, superinfection and eradication of causative pathogens.Results: 157 patients were enrolled in the study, among whom microbiological persistence, superinfection or eradication was present in 67 (48%), 25 (16%) and 65 (41%), respectively, after 72 h. Those with superinfection had the highest mortalities in the intensive care unit (p=0.015) and at 90 days (p=0.036), while also having the fewest ventilator-free days (p=0.019). Multivariable analysis revealed shock at VAP diagnosis (OR 3.43, 95% CI 1.25–9.40),Staphylococcus aureusisolation at VAP diagnosis (OR 2.87, 95% CI 1.06–7.75) and hypothermia at VAP diagnosis (OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.48–0.95, per +1°C) to be associated with superinfection.Conclusions: Our retrospective analysis suggests that VAP short- and long-term outcomes may be associated with superinfection in follow-up cultures. Follow-up cultures may help guide antibiotic therapy and its duration. Further prospective studies are necessary to verify our findings.

In 2015, in a cohort of immunocompetent adults, we reported PES pathogens (Pseudomonas aeruginosa, extended-spectrum b-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus) in 6% of patients with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) and microbiological diagnosis. We proposed the use of the PES score, as described previously [1], to assess the risk of pneumonia due to PES pathogens. The score was shown to have good accuracy, with an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.754 (0.708–0.801). We therefore decided to investigate the frequency and characteristics of CAP caused by PES pathogens in late elderly (≥80 years old) patients with CAP.