The management of patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) and potentially resectable liver metastases (LM) requires quick assessment of mutational status and of response to pre-operative systemic therapy. In a prospective phase II trial (NCT01442935), we investigated the clinical validity of circulating tumor cell (CTC) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) detection. CRC patients with potentially resectable LM were treated with first-line triplet or doublet chemotherapy combined with targeted therapy. CTC (Cellsearch^®) and Kirsten RAt Sarcoma (KRAS) ctDNA (droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (PCR)) levels were assessed at inclusion, after 4 weeks of therapy and before LM surgery. 153 patients were enrolled. The proportion of patients with high CTC counts (≥3 CTC/7.5mL) decreased during therapy: 19% (25/132) at baseline, 3% (3/108) at week 4 and 0/57 before surgery. ctDNA detection sensitivity at baseline was 91% (N=42/46) and also decreased during treatment. Interestingly, persistently detectable KRAS ctDNA (p = 0.01) at 4 weeks was associated with a lower R0/R1 LM resection rate. Among patients who had a R0/R1 LM resection, those with detectable ctDNA levels before liver surgery had a shorter overall survival (p < 0.001). In CRC patients with limited metastatic spread, ctDNA could be used as liquid biopsy tool. Therefore, ctDNA detection could help to select patients eligible for LM resection.

Purpose: Chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is the current standard of care for patients diagnosed with locally advanced anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC), but some patients develop local and/or distant relapse during follow-up. This study was designed to monitor human papillomavirus (HPV) circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) levels during CRT in patients with ASCC. Experimental Design: We analyzed samples from patients with HPV16- or HPV18-positive locally advanced ASCC. Blood samples were collected before and after CRT. HPV16 or HPV18 ctDNA detection was performed by droplet digital-PCR. Results: HPV ctDNA was detected before CRT in 29 of 33 patients with stages II–III ASCC [sensitivity: 88%; 95% confidence interval (CI), 72–95]; ctDNA positivity rate was associated with tumor stage (64% and 100% in stages II and III, respectively; P = 0.008). Among ctDNA-positive patients at baseline, ctDNA levels were higher in N+ than in N− tumors (median 85 copies/mL, range = 8–9,333 vs. 32 copies/mL, range = 3–1,350; P = 0.03). ctDNA detection at baseline had no significant prognostic impact. After CRT, three of 18 (17%) patients displayed residual detectable HPV ctDNA; ctDNA detection after CRT was strongly associated with shorter disease-free survival (P < 0.0001). Conclusions: This is the first proof-of-concept study assessing the prognostic value of ctDNA after CRT in locally advanced ASCC. In most patients, HPV ctDNA can be detected before CRT and becomes undetectable during CRT. In this study, we show that residual ctDNA levels after CRT are associated with very poor outcome. Clin Cancer Res; 24(22); 5767–71. ©2018 AACR.

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) are particularly rare in non-metastatic breast cancer, and the clinical validity of CTC detection in that clinical setting was initially not well recognized. A cytological CTC detection device (CellSearch) fulfilling the CLIA requirements for analytical validity was subsequently developed and, in 2008, we reported the first study (REMAGUS02) showing that distant metastasis-free survival was shorter in early breast cancer patients with one or more CTCs. In the past 10 years, other clinical studies and meta-analyses have established CTC detection as a level-of-evidence 1 prognostic biomarker for local relapses, distant relapses, and overall survival. This review summarizes available data on CTC detection and the promises of this proliferation- and subtype-independent metastasis-associated biomarker in early breast cancer patients.

Introduction: In hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, ESR1 mutations have emerged as a key mechanism of resistance to endocrine therapy. Areas covered: Here, we review currently available data on ESR1 mutations, regarding their functional impact, prevalence at different stages (and according to the material used: tissue-based analysis vs liquid biopsy), prognostic impact and predictive value of resistance to aromatase inhibitors. Possible strategies to overcome this resistance by using selective estrogen receptor downregulators (such as fulvestrant) are also discussed. Expert opinion: ESR1 mutation detection will probably become a prognostic and predictive biomarker in the future, used in clinical practice for hormone-receptor breast cancer, especially in the metastatic setting. In the future, we should expect to assess ESR1 mutations, using liquid biopsy (by digital-PCR or next-generation sequencing), in the same way as other prognostic or predictive biomarkers, such as EGFR mutations in lung cancer, and possibly even have targeted-therapies against these mutations.