This article examines the connectedness between Bitcoin returns and returns of ten additional cryptocurrencies for several frequencies—daily, weekly, and monthly—over the period January 2015–March 2020 using a nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag (NARDL) approach. We find important and positive interdependencies among cryptocurrencies and significant long-run relationships among most of them. In addition, non-Bitcoin cryptocurrency returns seem to react in the same way to positive and negative changes in Bitcoin returns, obtaining strong evidence of asymmetry in the short run. Finally, our results show high persistence in the impact of both positive and negative changes in Bitcoin returns on most of the other cryptocurrency returns. Thus, our model explains about 50% of the other cryptocurrency returns with changes in Bitcoin returns.

We examine investor behavior under interest and inflation risk in different scenarios. To that end, we analyze the relation between stock returns and unexpected changes in nominal and real interest rates and inflation for the US stock market. This relation is examined in detail by breaking the results down from the US stock market level to sector, sub-sector and to individual industries as the ability of different industries to absorb unexpected changes in interest rates and inflation can vary by industry and by contraction and expansion sub-periods. While most significant relations are conventionally negative, some are consistently positive. This suggests some relevant implications on investor behavior. Thus, investments in industries with this positive relation can form a safe haven from unexpected changes in real and nominal interest rates. Gold has an insignificant beta during recessionary conditions hinting that Gold can be a safe haven during recessions. However, Gold also has a consistent negative relation to unexpected changes in inflation thereby damaging the claim that Gold is a hedge against inflation.

This article examines the sensitivity of U.S. sector equity indices to changes in nominal interest rates and in the corresponding principal components (level, slope and curvature of the U.S. yield curve) over the period 1990–2013 using factor models and a nonlinear autoregressive distributed lag (N.A.R.D.L.) approach. Furthermore, for robustness, this research analyses whether the sensitivity of sector stock returns is different depending on the stage of the economy, splitting the whole sample period into two sub-periods: pre-crisis and subprime crisis. In general, the empirical results confirm a substantial exposure to interest rate risk that depends on the model used and the period analysed. In addition, considering the three principal components of the U.S. yield curve, the sensitivity to changes in these components tends to be stronger during the subprime crisis sub-period. Finally, in the N.A.R.D.L. context, about 50% of sectors show long-run relations between sector stock returns and the explanatory factors, mainly during the whole sample and the pre-crisis sub-period. Nevertheless, short-run responses may be mostly shown in the subprime crisis sub-period. Therefore, our results evidence that nominal interest rates and its three components would have asymmetric effects on the U.S. stock returns at sector level, depending on the stage of the economy.