Johann Peter Gogarten

Prof. Dr. Johann Peter Gogarten

Department of Molecular and Cell Biology & Institute for Systems Genomics, University of Connecticut, Storrs CT 06269-3125, USA
orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

44Years (1983-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
17 July 2015 in Nature Reviews Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
SSShannon M. Soucy
Shannon M. Soucy
JHJinling Huang
Jinling Huang
JGJohann Peter Gogarten
Johann Peter Gogarten

1 August 2005 in Nature Reviews Microbiology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
JGJohann Peter Gogarten
Johann Peter Gogarten
Jeffrey P TownsendJeffrey P Townsend
Jeffrey P Townsend

1 December 2002 in Molecular Biology and Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JGJohann Peter Gogarten
Johann Peter Gogarten
WDW. Ford Doolittle
W. Ford Doolittle
JLJeffrey G. Lawrence
Jeffrey G. Lawrence
Accumulating prokaryotic gene and genome sequences reveal that the exchange of genetic information through both homology-dependent recombination and horizontal (lateral) gene transfer (HGT) is far more important, in quantity and quality, than hitherto imagined. The traditional view, that prokaryotic evolution can be understood primarily in terms of clonal divergence and periodic selection, must be augmented to embrace gene exchange as a creative force, itself responsible for much of the pattern of similarities and differences we see between prokaryotic microbes. Rather than replacing periodic selection on genetic diversity, gene loss, and other chromosomal alterations as important players in adaptive evolution, gene exchange acts in concert with these processes to provide a rich explanatory paradigm—some of whose implications we explore here. In particular, we discuss (1) the role of recombination and HGT in giving phenotypic “coherence” to prokaryotic taxa at all levels of inclusiveness, (2) the implications of these processes for the reconstruction and meaning of “phylogeny,” and (3) new views of prokaryotic adaptation and diversification based on gene acquisition and exchange.

1 September 1989 in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JGJohann Peter Gogarten
Johann Peter Gogarten
HKH Kibak
H Kibak
PDP Dittrich
P Dittrich
LTL Taiz
L Taiz
EBE J Bowman
E J Bowman
MYM Yoshida
M Yoshida
Active transport across the vacuolar components of the eukaryotic endomembrane system is energized by a specific vacuolar H+-ATPase. The amino acid sequences of the 70- and 60-kDa subunits of the vacuolar H+-ATPase are approximately equal to 25% identical to the beta and alpha subunits, respectively, of the eubacterial-type F0F1-ATPases. We now report that the same vacuolar H+-ATPase subunits are approximately equal to 50% identical to the alpha and beta subunits, respectively, of the sulfur-metabolizing Sulfolobus acidocaldarius, an archaebacterium (Archaeobacterium). Moreover, the homologue of an 88-amino acid stretch near the amino-terminal end of the 70-kDa subunit is absent from the F0F1-ATPase beta subunit but is present in the alpha subunit of Sulfolobus. Since the two types of subunits (alpha and beta subunits; 60- and 70-kDa subunits) are homologous to each other, they must have arisen by a gene duplication that occurred prior to the last common ancestor of the eubacteria, eukaryotes, and Sulfolobus. Thus, the phylogenetic tree of the subunits can be rooted at the site where the gene duplication occurred. The inferred evolutionary tree contains two main branches: a eubacterial branch and an eocyte branch that gave rise to Sulfolobus and the eukaryotic host cell. The implication is that the vacuolar H+-ATPase of eukaryotes arose by the internalization of the plasma membrane H+-ATPase of an archaebacterial-like ancestral cell.

6 December 2006 in Genome Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
PNPhilippe Normand
Philippe Normand
PLPascal Lapierre
Pascal Lapierre
LTLouis Tisa
Louis Tisa
JGJohann Peter Gogarten
Johann Peter Gogarten
NANicole Alloisio
Nicole Alloisio
DBDavid R. Benson
David R. Benson
Soil bacteria that also form mutualistic symbioses in plants encounter two major levels of selection. One occurs during adaptation to and survival in soil, and the other occurs in concert with host plant speciation and adaptation. Actinobacteria from the genus Frankia are facultative symbionts that form N2-fixing root nodules on diverse and globally distributed angiosperms in the “actinorhizal” symbioses. Three closely related clades of Frankia sp. strains are recognized; members of each clade infect a subset of plants from among eight angiosperm families. We sequenced the genomes from three strains; their sizes varied from 5.43 Mbp for a narrow host range strain (Frankia sp. strain HFPCcI3) to 7.50 Mbp for a medium host range strain (Frankia alni strain ACN14a) to 9.04 Mbp for a broad host range strain (Frankia sp. strain EAN1pec.) This size divergence is the largest yet reported for such closely related soil bacteria (97.8%–98.9% identity of 16S rRNA genes). The extent of gene deletion, duplication, and acquisition is in concert with the biogeographic history of the symbioses and host plant speciation. Host plant isolation favored genome contraction, whereas host plant diversification favored genome expansion. The results support the idea that major genome expansions as well as reductions can occur in facultative symbiotic soil bacteria as they respond to new environments in the context of their symbioses.

1 March 2009 in Trends in Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PLPascal Lapierre
Pascal Lapierre
JGJohann Peter Gogarten
Johann Peter Gogarten