Dev Niyogi

Dr. Dev Niyogi

Department of Earth, Atmospheric, and Planetary Sciences, and Department of Agronomy - Crops, Soils, and Water Sciences, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

21Years (2006-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
15 November 2009 in International Journal of Climatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
CKC. M. Kishtawal
C. M. Kishtawal
DNDev Niyogi
Dev Niyogi
MTMukul Tewari
Mukul Tewari
RPRoger A. Pielke
Roger A. Pielke
JSJ. Marshall Shepherd
J. Marshall Shepherd
We assess the urbanization impacts on the heavy rainfall climatology during the Indian summer monsoon. While a number of studies have identified the impact of urbanization on local precipitation, a large‐scale assessment has been lacking. This relation between urbanization and Indian monsoon rainfall changes is investigated by analyzing in situ and satellite‐based precipitation and population datasets. Using a long‐term daily rainfall dataset and high‐resolution gridded analysis of human population, this study showed a significantly increasing trend in the frequency of heavy rainfall climatology over urban regions of India during the monsoon season. Urban regions experience less occurrences of light rainfall and significantly higher occurrences of intense precipitation compared to nonurban regions. Very heavy and extreme rainfall events showed increased trends over both urban and rural areas, but the trends over urban areas were larger and statistically more significant. Our analysis suggests that there is adequate statistical basis to conclude that the observed increasing trend in the frequency of heavy rainfall events over Indian monsoon region is more likely to be over regions where the pace of urbanization is faster. Moreover, rainfall measurements from satellites also indicate that urban areas are more (less) likely to experience heavier (lighter) precipitation rates compared to those in nonurban areas. While the mechanisms causing this enhancement in rainfall remain to be studied, the results provide the evidence that the increase in the heavy rainfall climatology over the Indian monsoon region is a signature of urban‐induced rainfall anomaly. Copyright © 2009 Royal Meteorological Society

1 May 2011 in Journal of Applied Meteorology and Climatology
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
DNDev Niyogi
Dev Niyogi
PPPatrick Pyle
Patrick Pyle
MLMing Lei
Ming Lei
SAS. Pal Arya
S. Pal Arya
CKChandra M. Kishtawal
Chandra M. Kishtawal
BWBrian Wolfe
Brian Wolfe
A radar-based climatology of 91 unique summertime (May 2000–August 2009) thunderstorm cases was examined over the Indianapolis, Indiana, urban area. The study hypothesis is that urban regions alter the intensity and composition/structure of approaching thunderstorms because of land surface heterogeneity. Storm characteristics were studied over the Indianapolis region and four peripheral rural counties approximately 120 km away from the urban center. Using radar imagery, the time of event, changes in storm structure (splitting, initiation, intensification, and dissipation), synoptic setting, orientation, and motion were studied. It was found that more than 60% of storms changed structure over the Indianapolis area as compared with only 25% over the rural regions. Furthermore, daytime convection was most likely to be affected, with 71% of storms changing structure as compared with only 42% at night. Analysis of radar imagery indicated that storms split closer to the upwind urban region and merge again downwind. Thus, a larger portion of small storms (50–200 km2) and large storms (>1500 km2) were found downwind of the urban region, whereas midsized storms (200–1500 km) dominated the upwind region. A case study of a typical storm on 13 June 2005 was examined using available observations and the fifth-generation Pennsylvania State University–NCAR Mesoscale Model (MM5), version 3.7.2. Two simulations were performed with and without the urban land use/Indianapolis region in the fourth domain (1.33-km resolution). The storm of interest could not be simulated without the urban area. Results indicate that removing the Indianapolis urban region caused distinct differences in the regional convergence and convection as well as in simulated base reflectivity, surface energy balance (through sensible heat flux, latent heat flux, and virtual potential temperature changes), and boundary layer structure. Study results indicate that the urban area has a strong climatological influence on regional thunderstorms.

13 May 2019 in Scientific Reports
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JLJie Liu
Jie Liu
DNDev Niyogi
Dev Niyogi
Even though it is known that urbanization affects rainfall, studies vary regarding the magnitude and location of rainfall change. To develop a comprehensive understanding of rainfall modification due to urbanization, a systematic meta-analysis is undertaken. The initial search identified over 2000 papers of which 489 were carefully analyzed. From these papers, 85 studies from 48 papers could be used in a quantitative meta-analysis assessment. Results were analyzed for case studies versus climatological assessments, observational versus modeling studies and for day versus night. Results highlight that urbanization modifies rainfall, such that mean precipitation is enhanced by 18% downwind of the city, 16% over the city, 2% on the left and 4% on the right with respect to the storm direction. The rainfall enhancement occurred approximately 20–50 km from the city center. Study results help develop a more complete picture of the role of urban processes in rainfall modification and highlight that rainfall increases not only downwind of the city but also over the city. These findings have implications for urban flooding as well as hydroclimatological studies. This meta-analysis highlights the need for standardizing how the results are presented in future studies to aid the generalization of findings.

24 August 2009 in International Journal of Climatology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
Souleymane FallSouleymane Fall
Souleymane Fall
DNDev Niyogi
Dev Niyogi
AGAlexander Gluhovsky
Alexander Gluhovsky
RPRoger A. Pielke
Roger A. Pielke
EKEugenia Kalnay
Eugenia Kalnay
GRGilbert Rochon
Gilbert Rochon
We investigate the sensitivity of surface temperature trends to land use land cover change (LULC) over the conterminous United States (CONUS) using the observation minus reanalysis (OMR) approach. We estimated the OMR trends for the 1979–2003 period from the US Historical Climate Network (USHCN), and the NCEP‐NCAR North American Regional Reanalysis (NARR). We used a new mean square differences (MSDs)‐based assessment for the comparisons between temperature anomalies from observations and interpolated reanalysis data. Trends of monthly mean temperature anomalies show a strong agreement, especially between adjusted USHCN and NARR (r = 0.9 on average) and demonstrate that NARR captures the climate variability at different time scales. OMR trend results suggest that, unlike findings from studies based on the global reanalysis (NCEP/NCAR reanalysis), NARR often has a larger warming trend than adjusted observations (on average, 0.28 and 0.27 °C/decade respectively).OMR trends were found to be sensitive to land cover types. We analysed decadal OMR trends as a function of land types using the Advanced Very High Resolution Radiometer (AVHRR) and new National Land Cover Database (NLCD) 1992–2001 Retrofit Land Cover Change. The magnitude of OMR trends obtained from the NLDC is larger than the one derived from the ‘static’ AVHRR. Moreover, land use conversion often results in more warming than cooling.Overall, our results confirm the robustness of the OMR method for detecting non‐climatic changes at the station level, evaluating the impacts of adjustments performed on raw observations, and most importantly, providing a quantitative estimate of additional warming trends associated with LULC changes at local and regional scales. As most of the warming trends that we identify can be explained on the basis of LULC changes, we suggest that in addition to considering the greenhouse gases–driven radiative forcings, multi‐decadal and longer climate models simulations must further include LULC changes. Copyright © 2009 Royal Meteorological Society

30 March 2010 in Water Resources Research
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
DNDev Niyogi
Dev Niyogi
CKChandra Kishtawal
Chandra Kishtawal
STShivam Tripathi
Shivam Tripathi
RGRao Govindaraju
Rao Govindaraju

30 October 2008 in Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
AKAnil Kumar
Anil Kumar
Jimy DudhiaJimy Dudhia
Jimy Dudhia
RRR. Rotunno
R. Rotunno
DNDev Niyogi
Dev Niyogi
UMU. C. Mohanty
U. C. Mohanty
A case‐study of the 26 July 2005 Mumbai heavy‐rain event that recorded 944 mm rainfall in 24 h with significant spatial variability was carried out using the Weather Research and Forecasting (WRF) model. The event was poorly forecasted by operational models and resulted in large human and economic losses. The present results indicate that the WRF system was able to reproduce the heavy rainfall event and the associated dynamical and thermo‐ dynamical features. A number of experiments were conducted with the WRF model that suggest the highly localized, heavy rain was the result of an interaction of synoptic‐scale weather systems with the mesoscale, coastal land‐surface features. These experiments indicate that the large‐scale rising motion over the Mumbai region was synoptically forced. Analysis of the model‐simulated intense, but short‐lived, convective rain cells forming in the large‐scale rising motion over Mumbai traces their moisture source to the north and northwesterly flow from the Arabian Sea. Synthetic sensitivity simulations without topography and without a land surface (land replaced with water) show that the large‐scale synoptic flow positioned the low‐pressure system over the Arabian Sea, while the mesoscale land‐surface (including topography and latent heating) feedback modulated the location and intensity of the rain by changes in the winds and regional moisture convergences. Another important feature captured in the high‐resolution model analysis is the formation of a mesoscale vortex over Mumbai that appears to have enhanced the conditions for localized, heavy rainfall over Mumbai. Copyright © 2008 Royal Meteorological Society