This paper presents the development, testing and validation of SWEEPER, a robot for harvesting sweet pepper fruit in greenhouses. The robotic system includes a six degrees of freedom industrial arm equipped with a specially designed end effector, RGB‐D camera, high‐end computer with graphics processing unit, programmable logic controllers, other electronic equipment, and a small container to store harvested fruit. All is mounted on a cart that autonomously drives on pipe rails and concrete floor in the end‐user environment. The overall operation of the harvesting robot is described along with details of the algorithms for fruit detection and localization, grasp pose estimation, and motion control. The main contributions of this paper are the integrated system design and its validation and extensive field testing in a commercial greenhouse for different varieties and growing conditions. A total of 262 fruits were involved in a 4‐week long testing period. The average cycle time to harvest a fruit was 24 s. Logistics took approximately 50% of this time (7.8 s for discharge of fruit and 4.7 s for platform movements). Laboratory experiments have proven that the cycle time can be reduced to 15 s by running the robot manipulator at a higher speed. The harvest success rates were 61% for the best fit crop conditions and 18% in current crop conditions. This reveals the importance of finding the best fit crop conditions and crop varieties for successful robotic harvesting. The SWEEPER robot is the first sweet pepper harvesting robot to demonstrate this kind of performance in a commercial greenhouse.

Current harvesting robots are limited by low detection rates due to the unstructured and dynamic nature of both the objects and the environment. State-of-the-art algorithms include color- and texture-based detection, which are highly sensitive to the illumination conditions. Deep learning algorithms promise robustness at the cost of significant computational resources and the requirement for intensive databases. In this paper we present a Flash-No-Flash (FNF) controlled illumination acquisition protocol that frees the system from most ambient illumination effects and facilitates robust target detection while using only modest computational resources and no supervised training. The approach relies on the simultaneous acquisition of two images—with/without strong artificial lighting (“Flash”/“no-Flash”). The difference between these images represents the appearance of the target scene as if only the artificial light was present, allowing a tight control over ambient light for color-based detection. A performance evaluation database was acquired in greenhouse conditions using an eye-in-hand RGB camera mounted on a robotic manipulator. The database includes 156 scenes with 468 images containing a total of 344 yellow sweet peppers. Performance of both color blob and deep-learning detection algorithms are compared on Flash-only and FNF images. The collected database is made public.

Current practice for vine yield estimation is based on RGB cameras and has limited performance. In this letter we present a method for outdoor vine yield estimation using a consumer grade RGB-D camera mounted on a mobile robotic platform. An algorithm for automatic grape cluster size estimation using depth information is evaluated both in controlled outdoor conditions and in commercial vineyard conditions. Ten video scans (3 camera viewpoints with 2 different backgrounds and 2 natural light conditions), acquired from a controlled outdoor experiment and a commercial vineyard setup, are used for analyses. The collected dataset (GRAPES3D) is released to the public. A total of 4542 regions of 49 grape clusters were manually labeled by a human annotator for comparison. Eight variations of the algorithm are assessed, both for manually labeled and auto-detected regions. The effect of viewpoint, presence of an artificial background, and the human annotator are analyzed using statistical tools. Results show 2.8-3.5 cm average error for all acquired data and reveal the potential of using low-cost commercial RGB-D cameras for improved robotic yield estimation.

Robotic harvesters that use visual servoing must choose the best direction from which to approach the fruit to minimize occlusion and avoid obstacles that might interfere with the detection along the approach. This work proposes different approach strategies, compares them in terms of cycle times, and presents a failure analysis methodology of the different approach strategies. The different approach strategies are: in-field assessment by human observers, evaluation based on an overview image using advanced algorithms or remote human observers, or attempting multiple approach directions until the fruit is successfully reached. In the latter approach, each attempt costs time, which is a major bottleneck in bringing harvesting robots into the market. Alternatively, a single approach strategy that only attempts one direction can be applied if the best approach direction is known a-priori. The different approach strategies were evaluated for a case study of sweet pepper harvesting in laboratorial and greenhouse conditions. The first experiment, conducted in a commercial greenhouse, revealed that the fruit approach cycle time increased 8% and 116% for reachable and unreachable fruits respectively when the multiple approach strategy was applied, compared to the single approach strategy. The second experiment measured human observers’ ability to provide insights to approach directions based on overview images taken in both greenhouse and laboratorial conditions. Results revealed that human observers are accurate in detecting unapproachable directions while they tend to miss approachable directions. By detecting fruits that are unreachable (via automatic algorithms or human operators), harvesting cycle times can be significantly shortened leading to improved commercial feasibility of harvesting robots.

This paper presents an automatic parameter tuning procedure specially developed for a dynamic adaptive thresholding algorithm for fruit detection. One of the major algorithm strengths is its high detection performances using a small set of training images. The algorithm enables robust detection in highly-variable lighting conditions. The image is dynamically split into variably-sized regions, where each region has approximately homogeneous lighting conditions. Nine thresholds were selected to accommodate three different illumination levels for three different dimensions in four color spaces: RGB, HSI, LAB, and NDI. Each color space uses a different method to represent a pixel in an image: RGB (Red, Green, Blue), HSI (Hue, Saturation, Intensity), LAB (Lightness, Green to Red and Blue to Yellow) and NDI (Normalized Difference Index, which represents the normal difference between the RGB color dimensions). The thresholds were selected by quantifying the required relation between the true positive rate and false positive rate. A tuning process was developed to determine the best fit values of the algorithm parameters to enable easy adaption to different kinds of fruits (shapes, colors) and environments (illumination conditions). Extensive analyses were conducted on three different databases acquired in natural growing conditions: red apples (nine images with 113 apples), green grape clusters (129 images with 1078 grape clusters), and yellow peppers (30 images with 73 peppers). These databases are provided as part of this paper for future developments. The algorithm was evaluated using cross-validation with 70% images for training and 30% images for testing. The algorithm successfully detected apples and peppers in variable lighting conditions resulting with an F-score of 93.17% and 99.31% respectively. Results show the importance of the tuning process for the generalization of the algorithm to different kinds of fruits and environments. In addition, this research revealed the importance of evaluating different color spaces since for each kind of fruit, a different color space might be superior over the others. The LAB color space is most robust to noise. The algorithm is robust to changes in the threshold learned by the training process and to noise effects in images.