Susan Peters

Susan Peters

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

16Years (2011-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
2 February 2022 in The Lancet Public Health
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
SPSusan Peters
Susan Peters
JDJack T Dennerlein
Jack T Dennerlein
GWGregory R Wagner
Gregory R Wagner
GSGlorian Sorensen
Glorian Sorensen
The COVID-19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of work in shaping population health and wellbeing. This Viewpoint applies a multilevel systems framework to assist in understanding the diverse and complex interactions of forces affecting worker health and wellbeing, and how trending changes in employment and working conditions have been accelerated by the pandemic. Government agencies concerned with population health and wellbeing, and economic activity must expand their capacity to monitor, evaluate, and respond to these trends. In addition, integrated enterprise and workplace-based approaches that consider the interactions among these multidimensional drivers will build organisation and worker resilience to navigate the continual changes in work and worker safety, health, and wellbeing in a post-pandemic world.

9 June 2020 in Human Factors: The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JDJack Dennerlein
Jack Dennerlein
LBLisa Burke
Lisa Burke
ESErika L. Sabbath
Erika L. Sabbath
JWJessica A. R. Williams
Jessica A. R. Williams
SPSusan Peters
Susan Peters
GSGlorian Sorensen
Glorian Sorensen
Objective: The aim was to recommend an integrated Total Worker Health (TWH) approach which embraces core human factors and ergonomic principles, supporting worker safety, health, and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic. Background: COVID-19 has resulted in unprecedented challenges to workplace safety and health for workers and managers in essential businesses, including healthcare workers, grocery stores, delivery services, warehouses, and distribution centers. Essential workers need protection, accurate information, and a supportive work environment with an unwavering focus on effective infection control. Method: The investigators reviewed emerging workplace recommendations for reducing workers’ exposures to the novel coronavirus and the challenges to workers in protecting their health. Using a theoretical framework and guidelines for integrating safety and health management systems into an organization for TWH, the investigators adapted the framework’s key characteristics to meet the specific worker safety and health issues for effective infection control, providing supports for increasing psychological demands while ensuring a safe work environment. Results: The recommended approach includes six key characteristics: focusing on working conditions for infection control and supportive environments for increased psychological demands; utilizing participatory approaches involving workers in identifying daily challenges and unique solutions; employing comprehensive and collaborative efforts to increase system efficiencies; committing as leaders to supporting workers through action and communications; adhering to ethical and legal standards; and using data to guide actions and evaluate progress. Conclusion: Applying an integrative TWH approach for worker safety, health, and well-being provides a framework to help managers systematically organize and protect themselves, essential workers, and the public during the COVID-19 pandemic. Application: By using the systems approach provided by the six implementation characteristics, employers of essential workers can organize their own efforts to improve system performance and worker well-being during these unprecedented times.

1 February 2015 in Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
MRMark Ross
Mark Ross
BHBen Hope
Ben Hope
ASAndy Stokes
Andy Stokes
SPSusan Peters
Susan Peters
IMIain McLeod
Iain McLeod
PDPhillip F.R. Duke
Phillip F.R. Duke

GSGlorian Sorensen
Glorian Sorensen
SPSusan Peters
Susan Peters
KNKarina Nielsen
Karina Nielsen
ENEve M. Nagler
Eve M. Nagler
MKMelissa Karapanos
Melissa Karapanos
GWGregory R. Wagner
Gregory R. Wagner
This paper addresses a significant gap in the literature by describing a study that tests the feasibility and efficacy of an organizational intervention to improve working conditions, safety, and wellbeing for low-wage food service workers. The Workplace Organizational Health Study tests the hypothesis that an intervention targeting the work organization and environment will result in improvements in workers’ musculoskeletal disorders and wellbeing. This ongoing study is being conducted in collaboration with a large food service company. Formative evaluation was used to prioritize outcomes, assess working conditions, and define essential intervention elements. The theory-driven intervention is being evaluated in a proof-of-concept trial, conducted to demonstrate feasibility and potential efficacy using a cluster randomized design. Ten worksites were randomly assigned to intervention or control conditions. The 13-month intervention uses a comprehensive systems approach to improve workplace policies and practices. Using principles of participatory engagement, the intervention targets safety and ergonomics; work intensity; and job enrichment. The evaluation will provide a preliminary assessment of estimates of the intervention effect on targeted outcomes and inform understanding of the intervention implementation across worksites. This study is expected to provide insights on methods to improve working conditions in support of the safety and wellbeing of low-wage workers.

SPSusan Peters
Susan Peters
GSGlorian Sorensen
Glorian Sorensen
JKJeffrey N. Katz
Jeffrey N. Katz
DGDaniel Alexander Gundersen
Daniel Alexander Gundersen
GWGregory R. Wagner
Gregory R. Wagner
Work is a major contributor to our health and well-being. Workers’ thriving is directly influenced by their job design, work environment and organization. The purpose of this report is to describe the qualitative methods used to develop the candidate items for a novel measure of Thriving from Work through a multi-step iterative process including: a literature review, workshop, interviews with experts, and cognitive testing of the candidate items. Through this process, we defined Thriving from Work as the state of positive mental, physical, and social functioning in which workers’ experiences of their work and working conditions enable them to thrive in their overall lives, contributing to their ability to achieve their full potential in their work, home, and community. Thriving from Work was conceptualized into 37 attributes across seven dimensions: psychological, emotional, social, work–life integration, basic needs, experience of work, and health. We ultimately identified, developed and/or modified 87 candidate questionnaire items mapped to these attributes that performed well in cognitive testing in demographically and occupationally diverse workers. The Thriving from Work Questionnaire will be subjected to psychometric testing and item reduction in future studies. Individual items demonstrated face validity and good cognitive response properties and may be used independently from the questionnaire.

13 January 2021 in Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
SPSusan Peters
Susan Peters
BJBhavana Jha
Bhavana Jha
MRMark Ross
Mark Ross