Philine Feulner

Philine Feulner

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

23Years (2004-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 December 2010 in Trends in Ecology & Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JSJessica Stapley
Jessica Stapley
JRJulia Reger
Julia Reger
PFPhiline Feulner
Philine Feulner
CSCarole Smadja
Carole Smadja
JGJuan Galindo
Juan Galindo
JSJon Slate
Jon Slate

6 November 2017 in Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JSJessica Stapley
Jessica Stapley
PFPhiline Feulner
Philine Feulner
SJSusan E. Johnston
Susan E. Johnston
ASAnna W. Santure
Anna W. Santure
CSCarole M. Smadja
Carole M. Smadja
Recombination, the exchange of DNA between maternal and paternal chromosomes during meiosis, is an essential feature of sexual reproduction in nearly all multicellular organisms. While the role of recombination in the evolution of sex has received theoretical and empirical attention, less is known about how recombination rate itself evolves and what influence this has on evolutionary processes within sexually reproducing organisms. Here, we explore the patterns of, and processes governing recombination in eukaryotes. We summarize patterns of variation, integrating current knowledge with an analysis of linkage map data in 353 organisms. We then discuss proximate and ultimate processes governing recombination rate variation and consider how these influence evolutionary processes. Genome-wide recombination rates (cM/Mb) can vary more than tenfold across eukaryotes, and there is large variation in the distribution of recombination events across closely related taxa, populations and individuals. We discuss how variation in rate and distribution relates to genome architecture, genetic and epigenetic mechanisms, sex, environmental perturbations and variable selective pressures. There has been great progress in determining the molecular mechanisms governing recombination, and with the continued development of new modelling and empirical approaches, there is now also great opportunity to further our understanding of how and why recombination rate varies. This article is part of the themed issue ‘Evolutionary causes and consequences of recombination rate variation in sexual organisms’.

20 June 2013 in Journal of Evolutionary Biology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
JSJ. Schroeder
J. Schroeder
HDH. L. Dugdale
H. L. Dugdale
RRR. Radersma
R. Radersma
MHMartin Hinsch
Martin Hinsch
DBD. M. Buehler
D. M. Buehler
NHN. P. C. Horrocks
N. P. C. Horrocks
Lower visibility of female scientists, compared to male scientists, is a potential reason for the under‐representation of women among senior academic ranks. Visibility in the scientific community stems partly from presenting research as an invited speaker at organized meetings. We analysed the sex ratio of presenters at the European Society for Evolutionary Biology (ESEB) Congress 2011, where all abstract submissions were accepted for presentation. Women were under‐represented among invited speakers at symposia (15% women) compared to all presenters (46%), regular oral presenters (41%) and plenary speakers (25%). At the ESEB congresses in 2001–2011, 9–23% of invited speakers were women. This under‐representation of women is partly attributable to a larger proportion of women, than men, declining invitations: in 2011, 50% of women declined an invitation to speak compared to 26% of men. We expect invited speakers to be scientists from top ranked institutions or authors of recent papers in high‐impact journals. Considering all invited speakers (including declined invitations), 23% were women. This was lower than the baseline sex ratios of early‐mid career stage scientists, but was similar to senior scientists and authors that have published in high‐impact journals. High‐quality science by women therefore has low exposure at international meetings, which will constrain Evolutionary Biology from reaching its full potential. We wish to highlight the wider implications of turning down invitations to speak, and encourage conference organizers to implement steps to increase acceptance rates of invited talks.

13 February 2015 in PLOS Genetics
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
PFPhiline Feulner
Philine Feulner
FCFrédéric J J Chain
Frédéric J J Chain
MPMahesh Panchal
Mahesh Panchal
YHYun Huang
Yun Huang
CEChristophe Eizaguirre
Christophe Eizaguirre
MMManfred Milinski
Manfred Milinski
The patterns of genomic divergence during ecological speciation are shaped by a combination of evolutionary forces. Processes such as genetic drift, local reduction of gene flow around genes causing reproductive isolation, hitchhiking around selected variants, variation in recombination and mutation rates are all factors that can contribute to the heterogeneity of genomic divergence. On the basis of 60 fully sequenced three-spined stickleback genomes, we explore these different mechanisms explaining the heterogeneity of genomic divergence across five parapatric lake and river population pairs varying in their degree of genetic differentiation. We find that divergent regions of the genome are mostly specific for each population pair, while their size and abundance are not correlated with the extent of genome-wide population differentiation. In each pair-wise comparison, an analysis of allele frequency spectra reveals that 25–55% of the divergent regions are consistent with a local restriction of gene flow. Another large proportion of divergent regions (38–75%) appears to be mainly shaped by hitchhiking effects around positively selected variants. We provide empirical evidence that alternative mechanisms determining the evolution of genomic patterns of divergence are not mutually exclusive, but rather act in concert to shape the genome during population differentiation, a first necessary step towards ecological speciation. A variety of evolutionary forces influence the genomic landscape of divergence during ecological speciation. Here we characterize the evolution of genomic divergence patterns based on 60 fully sequenced three-spined stickleback genomes, contrasting lake and river populations that differ in parasite abundance. Our comparison of the size and abundance of divergent regions in the genomes across a continuum of population differentiation suggests that selection and the hitchhiking effect on neutral sites mainly contributes to the observed heterogeneous patterns of genomic divergence. Additional divergent regions of the genome can be explained by a local reduction of gene flow. Our description of genomic divergence patterns across a continuum of population differentiation combined with an analysis of molecular signatures of evolution highlights how adaptation shapes the differentiation of sticklebacks in freshwater habitats.

1 October 2008 in Evolution
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
MTMichael Tobler
Michael Tobler
TDThomas J. DeWitt
Thomas J. DeWitt
ISIngo Schlupp
Ingo Schlupp
FLFrancisco Javier García De León
Francisco Javier García De León
RHRoger Herrmann
Roger Herrmann
MPMartin Plath
Martin Plath

10 December 2008 in Journal of Biogeography
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
ASA. Skog
A. Skog
FZF. E. Zachos
F. E. Zachos
ERE. K. Rueness
E. K. Rueness
PFPhiline Feulner
Philine Feulner
AMAtle Mysterud
Atle Mysterud
KJK. S. Jakobsen
K. S. Jakobsen