Guanhua Li

Dr. Guanhua Li

orcid

Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

14Years (2013-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 July 2019 in Cancer Management and Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GLGuanhua Li
Guanhua Li
YZYu Zhang
Yu Zhang
HMHongmin Ma
Hongmin Ma
JZJunmeng Zheng
Junmeng Zheng
Background: Two prevailing, totally implantable venous access ports are routinely utilized in oncology: chest port or arm port. This systematic review with meta-analysis was conducted to compare safety and efficiency of the two techniques. Methods: We performed evidence acquisition intensively from PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Available comparative studies that evaluated both techniques were identified. The outcomes of interest included total complication events, procedure-related infections, thrombosis, intra-operative complications, mechanical complications, conversion rate, early port removal, and operating time. Results: Thirteen comparative studies including 3,896 patients (2,176 for chest ports, and 1,720 for arm ports) were identified. The present study showed that arm port was associated with higher procedure conversion rate (2.51% in chest port group and 8.32% in arm port group; odd ratios [OR] 0.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15-0.46; p<0.001), but lower incidence of intra-operative complications (1.38% in chest port group and 0.41% in arm port group; OR 2.38, 95% CI 1.07–5.29; p=0.03). There were no between-group differences with respect to total complication events, procedure-related infections, thrombosis, mechanical complications, early port removal, and operating time. Subgroup analysis of patients under 60 years revealed that no significant difference was detected in intra-operative events (1.19% in chest port group and 0.02% in arm port group, OR 2.59, 95% CI 0.74–9.08; p<0.14), indicating that age may be a risk factor for intra-operative events. Sensitivity analysis did not change conclusions of all endpoints of interest. Conclusion: Arm port is associated with higher procedure conversion rate, but lower incidence of intra-operative complications, and age may be a risk factor for intra-operative events.

1 April 2021 in Journal of Inflammation Research
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GLGuanhua Li
Guanhua Li
JZJianfeng Zeng
Jianfeng Zeng
ZLZhaoyuan Liu
Zhaoyuan Liu
YZYu Zhang
Yu Zhang
XFXiao ping Fan
Xiao ping Fan
Background: COVID-19 is still a worldwide pandemic and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is vital for extremely critical COVID-19 patients. Pulsatile flow impacts greatly on organ function and microcirculation, however, the effects of pulsatile flow on hemodynamics and inflammatory responses during ECMO are unknown. An in vivo study was launched aiming at comparing the two perfusion modes in ECMO. Methods: Fourteen beagles were randomly allocated into two groups: the pulsatile group (n=7) and the non-pulsatile group (n=7). ECMO was conducted using the i-Cor system for 24 hours. Hemodynamic parameters including surplus hemodynamic energy (SHE), energy equivalent pressure (EEP), oxygenator pressure drop (OPD), and circuit pressure drop (CPD) were monitored. To assess inflammatory responses during ECMO, levels of tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α), interleukin-1β (IL-1β), IL-6, IL-8, and transforming growth factor-β 1 (TGF-β 1) were measured. Results: EEP and SHE were markedly higher in pulsatile circuits when compared with the conventional circuits. Between-group differences in both OPD and CPD reached statistical significance. Significant decreases in TNF-α were seen in animals treated with pulsatile flows at 2 hours, 12 hours, and 24 hours as well as a decrease in IL-1β at 24 hours during ECMO. The TGF-β 1 levels were significantly higher in pulsatile circuits from 2 hours to 24 hours. The changes in IL-6 and IL-8 levels were insignificant. Conclusion: The modification of pulsatility in ECMO generates more hemodynamic energies and attenuates inflammatory responses as compared to the conventional non-pulsatile ECMO.

1 December 2019 in International Journal of Surgery
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
GLGuanhua Li
Guanhua Li
YZYu Zhang
Yu Zhang
ZWZhichao Wu
Zhichao Wu
ZLZhaoyuan Liu
Zhaoyuan Liu
JZJunmeng Zheng
Junmeng Zheng
Two prevalent harvesting techniques are routinely utilized in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG): endoscopic vein harvesting (EVH) and open vein harvesting (OVH). Our purpose is to compare mid-term and long-term outcomes between these two techniques for CABG. After the acquisition of evidence, available studies assessing both harvesting techniques with follow-up precondition (a minimum of one year) were identified. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes of interest included the number of intra-operative graft injuries, leg-wound complications, in-hospital mortality, major adverse cardiac events (MACE) and graft patency. Twenty-two studies including 27911 patients were identified. The incidences of all-cause mortality, in-hospital death, and MACE were similar between EVH and OVH. EVH was associated with more graft injuries (weighted mean difference (WMD) 0.73; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18-1.28; P = 0.009), lower mid-term graft patency (odds ratio (OR) 0.80; 95% CI 0.70-0.91; P = 0.0005), and decreased long-term graft patency (OR 0.15, 95% CI 0.04-0.61; P = 0.008) as compared with OVH. Fewer leg-wound complications were observed in endoscopic harvesting as compared to conventional technique (OR 0.19, 95% CI 0.12-0.30; P < 0.001). Data from subgroup analysis suggested study period as a key factor affecting the outcomes for graft patency. The risks for all-cause mortality, in-hospital death, and MACE are similar between EVH and OVH. EVH increases conduit injuries and lowers mid-long term graft patency rates, however, study period, with growing surgical expertise, may be associated with better outcomes.

1 March 2013 in International Journal of Nanomedicine
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
GLGuanhua Li
Guanhua Li
SWShenming Wang
Shenming Wang
ZHZuojun Hu
Zuojun Hu
HYHenghui Yin
Henghui Yin
YZYunjian Zhang
Yunjian Zhang
WLWen Li
Wen Li
The application of RNA interference techniques is promising in gene therapeutic approaches, especially for cancers. To improve safety and efficiency of small interfering RNA (siRNA) delivery, a triblock dendritic nanocarrier, polyamidoamine-polyethylene glycol-cyclic RGD (PAMAM-PEG-cRGD), was developed and studied as an siRNA vector targeting the human ether-à-go-go-related gene (hERG) in human anaplastic thyroid carcinoma cells. Structure characterization, particle size, zeta potential, and gel retardation assay confirmed that complete triblock components were successfully synthesized with effective binding capacity of siRNA in this triblock nanocarrier. Cytotoxicity data indicated that conjugation of PEG significantly alleviated cytotoxicity when compared with unmodified PAMAM. PAMAM-PEG-cRGD exerted potent siRNA cellular internalization in which transfection efficiency measured by flow cytometry was up to 68% when the charge ratio (N/P ratio) was 3.5. Ligand-receptor affinity together with electrostatic interaction should be involved in the nano-siRNA endocytosis mechanism and we then proved that attachment of cRGD enhanced cellular uptake via RGD-integrin recognition. Gene silencing was evaluated by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction and PAMAM-PEG-cRGD-siRNA complex downregulated the expression of hERG to 26.3% of the control value. Furthermore, gene knockdown of hERG elicited growth suppression as well as activated apoptosis by means of abolishing vascular endothelial growth factor secretion and triggering caspase-3 cascade in anaplastic thyroid carcinoma cells. Our study demonstrates that this novel triblock polymer, PAMAM-PEG-cRGD, exhibits negligible cytotoxicity, effective transfection, “smart” cancer targeting, and therefore is a promising siRNA nanocarrier.

9 July 2021 in Microcirculation
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
PDF file
YZYu Zhang
Yu Zhang
JZJianfeng Zeng
Jianfeng Zeng
XHXiaoqian He
Xiaoqian He
WCWeidong Cao
Weidong Cao
XPXiaopeng Peng
Xiaopeng Peng
GLGuanhua Li
Guanhua Li

10 October 2022 in Frontiers in Physiology
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
CLChenxin Liu
Chenxin Liu
KMKuai Ma
Kuai Ma
YZYunchao Zhang
Yunchao Zhang
XHXing He
Xing He
LSLinjiang Song
Linjiang Song
CLchi liu
chi liu
The most extensively and well-investigated sequences in the human genome are protein-coding genes, while large numbers of non-coding sequences exist in the human body and are even more diverse with more potential roles than coding sequences. With the unveiling of non-coding RNA research, long-stranded non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs), a class of transcripts >200 nucleotides in length primarily expressed in the nucleus and rarely in the cytoplasm, have drawn our attention. LncRNAs are involved in various levels of gene regulatory processes, including but not limited to promoter activity, epigenetics, translation and transcription efficiency, and intracellular transport. They are also dysregulated in various pathophysiological processes, especially in diseases and cancers involving genomic imprinting. In recent years, numerous studies have linked lncRNAs to the pathophysiology of various kidney diseases. This review summarizes the molecular mechanisms involved in lncRNAs, their impact on kidney diseases, and associated complications, as well as the value of lncRNAs as emerging biomarkers for the prevention and prognosis of kidney diseases, suggesting their potential as new therapeutic tools.