Jin Chen

Jin Chen


Research Focus & Metrics

Academic Career Length

27Years (2000-Present)

(Calculated once Scilit publication data is synced: current year − year of first publication + 1)

Representative Publications

View All Publications
1 June 2004 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
JCJin Chen
Jin Chen
Per JönssonPer Jönsson
Per Jönsson
MTMasayuki Tamura
Masayuki Tamura
ZGZhihui Gu
Zhihui Gu
BMBunkei Matsushita
Bunkei Matsushita
LELars Eklundh
Lars Eklundh

1 May 2015 in ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
JCJun Chen
Jun Chen
JCJin Chen
Jin Chen
ALAnping Liao
Anping Liao
XCXin Cao
Xin Cao
LCLijun Chen
Lijun Chen
JMJon Mills
Jon Mills
Global Land Cover (GLC) information is fundamental for environmental change studies, land resource management, sustainable development, and many other societal benefits. Although GLC data exists at spatial resolutions of 300m and 1000m, a 30m resolution mapping approach is now a feasible option for the next generation of GLC products. Since most significant human impacts on the land system can be captured at this scale, a number of researchers are focusing on such products. This paper reports the operational approach used in such a project, which aims to deliver reliable data products.Over 10,000 Landsat-like satellite images are required to cover the entire Earth at 30m resolution. To derive a GLC map from such a large volume of data necessitates the development of effective, efficient, economic and operational approaches. Automated approaches usually provide higher efficiency and thus more economic solutions, yet existing automated classification has been deemed ineffective because of the low classification accuracy achievable (typically below 65%) at global scale at 30m resolution. As a result, an approach based on the integration of pixel- and object-based methods with knowledge (POK-based) has been developed. To handle the classification process of 10 land cover types, a split-and-merge strategy was employed, i.e. firstly each class identified in a prioritized sequence and then results are merged together. For the identification of each class, a robust integration of pixel-and object-based classification was developed. To improve the quality of the classification results, a knowledge-based interactive verification procedure was developed with the support of web service technology. The performance of the POK-based approach was tested using eight selected areas with differing landscapes from five different continents. An overall classification accuracy of over 80% was achieved. This indicates that the developed POK-based approach is effective and feasible for operational GLC mapping at 30m resolution

21 December 2012 in International Journal of Remote Sensing
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PGPeng Gong
Peng Gong
JWJie Wang
Jie Wang
Le YuLe Yu
Le Yu
YZYongchao Zhao
Yongchao Zhao
YZYuanyuan Zhao
Yuanyuan Zhao
JCJun Chen
Jun Chen
We have produced the first 30 m resolution global land-cover maps using Landsat Thematic Mapper (TM) and Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+) data. We have classified over 6600 scenes of Landsat TM data after 2006, and over 2300 scenes of Landsat TM and ETM+ data before 2006, all selected from the green season. These images cover most of the world's land surface except Antarctica and Greenland. Most of these images came from the United States Geological Survey in level L1T (orthorectified). Four classifiers that were freely available were employed, including the conventional maximum likelihood classifier (MLC), J4.8 decision tree classifier, Random Forest (RF) classifier and support vector machine (SVM) classifier. A total of 91,433 training samples were collected by traversing each scene and finding the most representative and homogeneous samples. A total of 38,664 test samples were collected at preset, fixed locations based on a globally systematic unaligned sampling strategy. Two software tools, Global Analyst and Global Mapper developed by extending the functionality of Google Earth, were used in developing the training and test sample databases by referencing the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer enhanced vegetation index (MODIS EVI) time series for 2010 and high resolution images from Google Earth. A unique land-cover classification system was developed that can be crosswalked to the existing United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) land-cover classification system as well as the International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme (IGBP) system. Using the four classification algorithms, we obtained the initial set of global land-cover maps. The SVM produced the highest overall classification accuracy (OCA) of 64.9% assessed with our test samples, with RF (59.8%), J4.8 (57.9%), and MLC (53.9%) ranked from the second to the fourth. We also estimated the OCAs using a subset of our test samples (8629) each of which represented a homogeneous area greater than 500 m × 500 m. Using this subset, we found the OCA for the SVM to be 71.5%. As a consistent source for estimating the coverage of global land-cover types in the world, estimation from the test samples shows that only 6.90% of the world is planted for agricultural production. The total area of cropland is 11.51% if unplanted croplands are included. The forests, grasslands, and shrublands cover 28.35%, 13.37%, and 11.49% of the world, respectively. The impervious surface covers only 0.66% of the world. Inland waterbodies, barren lands, and snow and ice cover 3.56%, 16.51%, and 12.81% of the world, respectively.

1 November 2010 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Xiaolin ZhuXiaolin Zhu
Xiaolin Zhu
JCJin Chen
Jin Chen
Feng GaoFeng Gao
Feng Gao
XCXuehong Chen
Xuehong Chen
JMJeffrey G. Masek
Jeffrey G. Masek

5 November 2007 in Sensors
Verified
Journal Article
Open access
PDF file
BMBunkei Matsushita
Bunkei Matsushita
WYWei Yang
Wei Yang
JCJin Chen
Jin Chen
YOYuyichi Onda
Yuyichi Onda
GQGuoyu Qiu
Guoyu Qiu
Vegetation indices play an important role in monitoring variations in vegetation.The Enhanced Vegetation Index (EVI) proposed by the MODIS Land Discipline Groupand the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) are both global-based vegetationindices aimed at providing consistent spatial and temporal information regarding globalvegetation. However, many environmental factors such as atmospheric conditions and soilbackground may produce errors in these indices. The topographic effect is another veryimportant factor, especially when the indices are used in areas of rough terrain. In thispaper, we theoretically analyzed differences in the topographic effect on the EVI and theNDVI based on a non-Lambertian model and two airborne-based images acquired from amountainous area covered by high-density Japanese cypress plantation were used as a casestudy. The results indicate that the soil adjustment factor “L” in the EVI makes it moresensitive to topographic conditions than is the NDVI. Based on these results, we stronglyrecommend that the topographic effect should be removed in the reflectance data beforethe EVI was calculated—as well as from other vegetation indices that similarly include a term without a band ratio format (e.g., the PVI and SAVI)—when these indices are used in the area of rough terrain, where the topographic effect on the vegetation indices having only a band ratio format (e.g., the NDVI) can usually be ignored.

1 January 2016 in Remote Sensing of Environment
Verified
Journal Article
Closed access
Xiaolin ZhuXiaolin Zhu
Xiaolin Zhu
EHEileen H. Helmer
Eileen H. Helmer
Feng GaoFeng Gao
Feng Gao
DLDesheng Liu
Desheng Liu
JCJin Chen
Jin Chen
MLMichael A. Lefsky
Michael A. Lefsky